Fintech use, digital divide and financial inclusion

IF 2.1 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Digital Policy Regulation and Governance Pub Date : 2022-09-30 DOI:10.1108/dprg-09-2021-0111
Solomon Odei-Appiah, Gamel O. Wiredu, J. Adjei
{"title":"Fintech use, digital divide and financial inclusion","authors":"Solomon Odei-Appiah, Gamel O. Wiredu, J. Adjei","doi":"10.1108/dprg-09-2021-0111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nFinancial Technology (FinTech) innovations enable the provision of financial services to many unbanked across the world by increasing access. The key role of FinTech to drive financial inclusion however suffers significant impediments including the digital divide. Nevertheless, there is paucity of elaborate theories on financial inclusion while extant literature on FinTech only identify factors that drive its acceptance and use with little attention to inhibitors such as the digital divide. This study aims to investigate the impact of FinTech usage on financial inclusion amid the digital divide.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study uses the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT2) and the model of digital inequality. A structural equation modeling technique is applied to data collected from 282 respondents in an online survey.\n\n\nFindings\nThe findings confirm a positive influence of FinTech use on financial inclusion as well as the influence of performance expectancy and facilitating conditions on behavioral intentions. The results also show that digital divide measured with access, resource and force moderate the use of FinTech.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study presents a theoretical model which is unique given that UTAUT2 was combined with digital divide moderators from the model of digital inequality to explain how FinTech usage impacts on financial inclusion. Addressing the research questions has led several theoretical contributions including the extension of the applicability of UTAUT2.\n","PeriodicalId":56357,"journal":{"name":"Digital Policy Regulation and Governance","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Policy Regulation and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dprg-09-2021-0111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose Financial Technology (FinTech) innovations enable the provision of financial services to many unbanked across the world by increasing access. The key role of FinTech to drive financial inclusion however suffers significant impediments including the digital divide. Nevertheless, there is paucity of elaborate theories on financial inclusion while extant literature on FinTech only identify factors that drive its acceptance and use with little attention to inhibitors such as the digital divide. This study aims to investigate the impact of FinTech usage on financial inclusion amid the digital divide. Design/methodology/approach This study uses the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT2) and the model of digital inequality. A structural equation modeling technique is applied to data collected from 282 respondents in an online survey. Findings The findings confirm a positive influence of FinTech use on financial inclusion as well as the influence of performance expectancy and facilitating conditions on behavioral intentions. The results also show that digital divide measured with access, resource and force moderate the use of FinTech. Originality/value This study presents a theoretical model which is unique given that UTAUT2 was combined with digital divide moderators from the model of digital inequality to explain how FinTech usage impacts on financial inclusion. Addressing the research questions has led several theoretical contributions including the extension of the applicability of UTAUT2.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
金融科技使用、数字鸿沟和普惠金融
金融技术(FinTech)创新通过增加获取渠道,使全球许多没有银行账户的人能够获得金融服务。然而,金融科技在推动普惠金融方面的关键作用面临着包括数字鸿沟在内的重大障碍。然而,关于金融普惠的详细理论缺乏,而现有的金融科技文献只确定了推动其接受和使用的因素,而很少关注数字鸿沟等抑制因素。本研究旨在探讨数字鸿沟中金融科技的使用对普惠金融的影响。设计/方法/方法本研究采用技术接受和使用的统一理论(UTAUT2)和数字不平等模型。本文采用结构方程建模技术对282名在线调查对象的数据进行了分析。研究结果证实了金融科技的使用对普惠金融的积极影响,以及绩效预期和便利条件对行为意图的影响。结果还表明,以获取、资源和力量衡量的数字鸿沟抑制了金融科技的使用。原创性/价值本研究提出了一个独特的理论模型,考虑到UTAUT2与数字不平等模型中的数字鸿沟调节因子相结合,以解释金融科技的使用如何影响金融包容性。解决研究问题已经导致了几个理论贡献,包括扩展UTAUT2的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Digital Policy Regulation and Governance
Digital Policy Regulation and Governance INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Emerald holds journals from the current and previous year. We hold all older back volumes and can supply high quality reprints for most volumes that were previously out-of-print. Complete list of titles we can supply from this publisher Publisher''s web page and subscription information
期刊最新文献
Socio and macroeconomic determinants of mobile money adoption: a cross-cultural study of selected MENA and Sub-Saharan countries Adoption of digital payment FinTech service by Gen Y and Gen Z users: evidence from India Blockchain technology in foreign trade management: which blockchain alternative is more suitable? Enterprise architecture for the transformation of public services based on citizen’s feedback Blockchain for environmental peacebuilding: application in water management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1