Nurmadi Harsa Sumarta, Prihatnolo Gandhi Amidjaya, M. Prabowo, T. Mulyaningsih
{"title":"Post-Issue of Sustainability Report: Does Market Valuation Improve?","authors":"Nurmadi Harsa Sumarta, Prihatnolo Gandhi Amidjaya, M. Prabowo, T. Mulyaningsih","doi":"10.47836/ijeam.17.1.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following the increased concern on sustainability reporting in Indonesia, this study\nattempts to investigate whether the issuance of sustainability report is able to provide\npositive impact on bank reputation and market valuation. We use a set of unbalanced\npanel data that consist of 43 Indonesian listed banks throughout 2010-2018 while our\nanalysis is performed with panel data regression using STATA statistics software. Overall, the findings demonstrate that environmental disclosure provides positive impact on market valuation while economic and social disclosure do not. We also find the mediating role of bank reputation between the link of environmental disclosure and market valuation. By splitting the observation period into pre and post sustainable finance roadmap implementation, we find that economic disclosure holds significant contribution to increasing market valuation in the period before sustainable finance roadmap implementation while social and environmental disclosure demonstrate positive effect in the period when sustainable finance roadmap is implemented. This study, however, still contains limitation due to the use of content analysis in assessing sustainability report quality that may contain subjectivity issue. Further studies can obtain external assurance from independent experts in this subject. The use of quantitative-qualitative mixed method may also be a solution to solve this issue. This study provides several implications. Firstly, this study supports the regulation from the Indonesia Financial Service Authority to increase the participation of Indonesian banks in sustainability reporting in which the implementation must be followed with high regulation enforcement. We also suggest the practice of sustainability reporting for Indonesian listed banks as it gives considerable benefit in higher market valuation. This research addresses the gap in Indonesian literature that is limited on determinant study by providing more insights on how sustainability reporting provides on higher bank reputation and market valuation.","PeriodicalId":40031,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Economics and Management","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Economics and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47836/ijeam.17.1.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Following the increased concern on sustainability reporting in Indonesia, this study
attempts to investigate whether the issuance of sustainability report is able to provide
positive impact on bank reputation and market valuation. We use a set of unbalanced
panel data that consist of 43 Indonesian listed banks throughout 2010-2018 while our
analysis is performed with panel data regression using STATA statistics software. Overall, the findings demonstrate that environmental disclosure provides positive impact on market valuation while economic and social disclosure do not. We also find the mediating role of bank reputation between the link of environmental disclosure and market valuation. By splitting the observation period into pre and post sustainable finance roadmap implementation, we find that economic disclosure holds significant contribution to increasing market valuation in the period before sustainable finance roadmap implementation while social and environmental disclosure demonstrate positive effect in the period when sustainable finance roadmap is implemented. This study, however, still contains limitation due to the use of content analysis in assessing sustainability report quality that may contain subjectivity issue. Further studies can obtain external assurance from independent experts in this subject. The use of quantitative-qualitative mixed method may also be a solution to solve this issue. This study provides several implications. Firstly, this study supports the regulation from the Indonesia Financial Service Authority to increase the participation of Indonesian banks in sustainability reporting in which the implementation must be followed with high regulation enforcement. We also suggest the practice of sustainability reporting for Indonesian listed banks as it gives considerable benefit in higher market valuation. This research addresses the gap in Indonesian literature that is limited on determinant study by providing more insights on how sustainability reporting provides on higher bank reputation and market valuation.
期刊介绍:
The journal focuses on economics and management issues. The main subjects for economics cover national macroeconomic issues, international economic issues, interactions of national and regional economies, microeconomics and macroeconomics policies. The journal also considers thought-leading substantive research in the finance discipline. The main subjects for management include management decisions, Small Medium Enterprises (SME) practices, corporate social policies, digital marketing strategies and strategic management. The journal emphasises empirical studies with practical applications; examinations of theoretical and methodological developments. The journal is committed to publishing the high quality articles from economics and management perspectives. It is a triannual journal published in April, August and December and all articles submitted are in English. IJEM follows a double-blind peer-review process, whereby authors do not know reviewers and vice versa. Peer review is fundamental to the scientific publication process and the dissemination of sound science.