Anti-Russian Sanctions in Global Economic Warfare

IF 0.3 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS MGIMO Review of International Relations Pub Date : 2022-12-30 DOI:10.24833/2071-8160-2022-6-87-26-35
A. Lebedev
{"title":"Anti-Russian Sanctions in Global Economic Warfare","authors":"A. Lebedev","doi":"10.24833/2071-8160-2022-6-87-26-35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the discrepancy between the declared goals of sanctions against Russia and their practical effects. The author puts forward a hypothesis according to which the real purpose of the anti-Russian sanctions imposed after the start of Russia's special military operation in Ukraine is not to change the foreign policy of the Russian Federation but to weaken the country as much as possible by causing economic damage to it and destabilizing the domestic political situation. Under these conditions, it is reasonable to consider sanctions as an \"economic war,\" which raises the question of the goals of such a war, the choice of optimal methods for its conduct, and ways to minimize damage to the national economy. The author distinguishes between \"defensive\" and \"offensive\" methods of economic warfare. The article argues that a country that has become the object of large-scale sanctions is unable to successfully resist them in the long term, relying solely on \"defensive\" mechanisms (for example, measures to support the economy). It must resort to \"offensive\" tools as well, for instance to the embargo for the export of goods that are of key importance for the stability of the economic model of the countries that initiated the sanctions.","PeriodicalId":42127,"journal":{"name":"MGIMO Review of International Relations","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MGIMO Review of International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2022-6-87-26-35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The article analyzes the discrepancy between the declared goals of sanctions against Russia and their practical effects. The author puts forward a hypothesis according to which the real purpose of the anti-Russian sanctions imposed after the start of Russia's special military operation in Ukraine is not to change the foreign policy of the Russian Federation but to weaken the country as much as possible by causing economic damage to it and destabilizing the domestic political situation. Under these conditions, it is reasonable to consider sanctions as an "economic war," which raises the question of the goals of such a war, the choice of optimal methods for its conduct, and ways to minimize damage to the national economy. The author distinguishes between "defensive" and "offensive" methods of economic warfare. The article argues that a country that has become the object of large-scale sanctions is unable to successfully resist them in the long term, relying solely on "defensive" mechanisms (for example, measures to support the economy). It must resort to "offensive" tools as well, for instance to the embargo for the export of goods that are of key importance for the stability of the economic model of the countries that initiated the sanctions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球经济战中的反俄制裁
文章分析了对俄制裁的宣称目标与实际效果之间的差异。笔者据此提出了一种假设,即俄罗斯在乌克兰的特殊军事行动开始后实施的反俄制裁的真正目的不是为了改变俄罗斯联邦的外交政策,而是通过对俄罗斯联邦造成经济上的损害和破坏国内政治局势的稳定来尽可能地削弱俄罗斯。在这种情况下,将制裁视为“经济战”是合理的,这就提出了这样一场战争的目标、最佳实施方式的选择以及如何将对国民经济的损害降到最低的问题。作者区分了经济战的“防御性”和“进攻性”方法。文章认为,一个成为大规模制裁对象的国家,如果仅仅依靠“防御”机制(例如支持经济的措施),就无法长期成功地抵制制裁。它还必须采取“进攻性”手段,例如,对发起制裁的国家的经济模式的稳定具有关键重要性的货物的出口实行禁运。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
MGIMO Review of International Relations
MGIMO Review of International Relations INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Lost in Broadcasting: League of Nations, International Broadcasting and Swiss Neutrality Pacific Pumas in Indian Jungle: Place of Latin America in Indo-Pacific Zionism influencing Hindutva The Kurdish Movement’s Factor in US Politics at the Peak of Iran and Afghanistan Crises, 1979 – January 1981 Migrant remittances and diaspora policies in Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1