Urinary biomarkers for the diagnosis of urothelial bladder cancer

Jamie J. D'Costa , Douglas G. Ward , Richard T. Bryan
{"title":"Urinary biomarkers for the diagnosis of urothelial bladder cancer","authors":"Jamie J. D'Costa ,&nbsp;Douglas G. Ward ,&nbsp;Richard T. Bryan","doi":"10.1016/j.nhtm.2016.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Urothelial bladder cancer<span><span><span> is a common cancer associated with considerable burden for both patients and healthcare providers alike. The majority of patients present with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) which, although not immediately life-threatening, requires appropriate initial management and long-term surveillance which is both invasive and costly. Accurate diagnostic urinary biomarkers could be transformational in this setting, yet have proved to be a significant challenge to bladder cancer scientists over the last two decades. Such biomarkers would need to represent a range of tumour grades and stages, encompass inter- and intra-tumour heterogeneity, and compete with the current diagnostic gold standard of </span>cystoscopy<span> with a sensitivity and specificity of 85% and 87%, respectively. For the field to move forward in this current exciting era of high-throughput proteomics and genomics, bladder cancer scientists need to find a consensus on the optimal urinary substrate (DNA, RNA, protein, etc) and deliver robust well-designed studies in the correct populations with appropriate statistical input. Issues relating to </span></span>tumour heterogeneity and anticipatory diagnosis also require considerable thought. The challenge remains unchanged.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":90660,"journal":{"name":"New horizons in translational medicine","volume":"3 5","pages":"Pages 221-223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.nhtm.2016.12.001","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New horizons in translational medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2307502316300467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Urothelial bladder cancer is a common cancer associated with considerable burden for both patients and healthcare providers alike. The majority of patients present with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) which, although not immediately life-threatening, requires appropriate initial management and long-term surveillance which is both invasive and costly. Accurate diagnostic urinary biomarkers could be transformational in this setting, yet have proved to be a significant challenge to bladder cancer scientists over the last two decades. Such biomarkers would need to represent a range of tumour grades and stages, encompass inter- and intra-tumour heterogeneity, and compete with the current diagnostic gold standard of cystoscopy with a sensitivity and specificity of 85% and 87%, respectively. For the field to move forward in this current exciting era of high-throughput proteomics and genomics, bladder cancer scientists need to find a consensus on the optimal urinary substrate (DNA, RNA, protein, etc) and deliver robust well-designed studies in the correct populations with appropriate statistical input. Issues relating to tumour heterogeneity and anticipatory diagnosis also require considerable thought. The challenge remains unchanged.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尿路上皮性膀胱癌诊断的尿液生物标志物
尿路上皮性膀胱癌是一种常见的癌症,对患者和医疗保健提供者都有相当大的负担。大多数患者患有非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC),虽然不会立即危及生命,但需要适当的初始治疗和长期监测,这既具有侵入性又昂贵。在这种情况下,准确诊断尿液生物标志物可能具有变革性,但在过去二十年中,这已被证明是膀胱癌科学家面临的重大挑战。这样的生物标志物需要代表一系列肿瘤分级和分期,包括肿瘤间和肿瘤内的异质性,并与目前的膀胱镜诊断金标准竞争,其灵敏度和特异性分别为85%和87%。为了在这个令人兴奋的高通量蛋白质组学和基因组学时代向前发展,膀胱癌科学家需要在最佳尿液底物(DNA, RNA,蛋白质等)上找到共识,并在正确的人群中提供可靠的精心设计的研究,并提供适当的统计输入。与肿瘤异质性和预期诊断有关的问题也需要深思熟虑。挑战依然没有改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contents Editorial Board Improving disease diagnosis by a new hybrid model Pros, cons and future of antibiotics Abstracts: 5th Annual Congress of the European Society for Translational Medicine (EUSTM-2017), 20-22 October 2017, Berlin, Germany
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1