The expression of vulgarity, force, severity and size

IF 0.4 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Studies in Language Pub Date : 2020-11-17 DOI:10.1075/sl.19073.wil
J. Willemsen, Ehm Hjorth Miltersen
{"title":"The expression of vulgarity, force, severity and size","authors":"J. Willemsen, Ehm Hjorth Miltersen","doi":"10.1075/sl.19073.wil","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Phonaesthemes are a common phenomenon, but they are generally not in paradigmatic opposition like morphemes are ( Svantesson 2017 : 6). Reta, however, has a phonaesthemic contrast /l/~/r/, where /r/-colouring of neutral base words signifies an increase in vulgarity, intensity, size or severity (e.g. ɓela ‘bad’ vs. ɓera ‘terrible’, -ool ‘penis’ vs. -oor ‘cock’). This paper describes this phenomenon in detail, and provides a discussion as to whether it is best classified as morphological, phonaesthemic, or otherwise. We argue that, although some of the cross-linguistic criteria for phonaesthesia exclude phonaesthemic /r/ from being classified as such, it is not straightforwardly classified as either phonological or morphological. Using Kwon & Round’s (2015) criteria for phonaesthesia and derivational morphology, we compare Reta phonaesthemic alternations to similar phenomena in other languages. We argue that such alternations differ fundamentally from both non-alternating phonaesthemes and morphology, and are best construed as a distinct cross-linguistic category.","PeriodicalId":46377,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Language","volume":"1 1","pages":"659-699"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Language","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.19073.wil","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract Phonaesthemes are a common phenomenon, but they are generally not in paradigmatic opposition like morphemes are ( Svantesson 2017 : 6). Reta, however, has a phonaesthemic contrast /l/~/r/, where /r/-colouring of neutral base words signifies an increase in vulgarity, intensity, size or severity (e.g. ɓela ‘bad’ vs. ɓera ‘terrible’, -ool ‘penis’ vs. -oor ‘cock’). This paper describes this phenomenon in detail, and provides a discussion as to whether it is best classified as morphological, phonaesthemic, or otherwise. We argue that, although some of the cross-linguistic criteria for phonaesthesia exclude phonaesthemic /r/ from being classified as such, it is not straightforwardly classified as either phonological or morphological. Using Kwon & Round’s (2015) criteria for phonaesthesia and derivational morphology, we compare Reta phonaesthemic alternations to similar phenomena in other languages. We argue that such alternations differ fundamentally from both non-alternating phonaesthemes and morphology, and are best construed as a distinct cross-linguistic category.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
粗俗、粗暴、严厉和大小的表达
语音主题是一种常见现象,但它们通常不像语素那样处于范式对立状态(Svantesson 2017: 6)。然而,Reta具有语音美学对比/l/~/r/,其中中性碱基的/r/着色表示粗俗,强度,大小或严重性的增加(例如,- ela“bad”vs. - era“terrible”,-ool“penis”vs. -oor“cock”)。本文对这一现象进行了详细的描述,并讨论了这一现象究竟应该被划分为形态、语音美学还是其他类型。我们认为,尽管一些跨语言的音觉标准排除了音觉/r/的分类,但它并没有直接分类为音系或形态。使用Kwon & Round(2015)的音感和衍生形态学标准,我们将Reta语的音美变化与其他语言中的类似现象进行了比较。我们认为,这种交替从根本上不同于非交替的音素主位和形态,最好被解释为一个独特的跨语言类别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Studies in Language provides a forum for the discussion of issues in contemporary linguistics from discourse-pragmatic, functional, and typological perspectives. Areas of central concern are: discourse grammar; syntactic, morphological and semantic universals; pragmatics; grammaticalization and grammaticalization theory; and the description of problems in individual languages from a discourse-pragmatic, functional, and typological perspective. Special emphasis is placed on works which contribute to the development of discourse-pragmatic, functional, and typological theory and which explore the application of empirical methodology to the analysis of grammar.
期刊最新文献
‘Until’ constructions and expletive negation in Huasteca Nahuatl On the link between grammaticalization and subjectification The paradigmaticity of evidentials in the Tibetic languages of Khams Evidentiality, discourse prominence and grammaticalization Speaking about knowledge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1