Can We Test for Liberation? Moving from Retributive to Restorative and Transformative Assessment in Schools

IF 0.6 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Critical Education Pub Date : 2017-10-01 DOI:10.14288/CE.V8I13.186313
W. Au
{"title":"Can We Test for Liberation? Moving from Retributive to Restorative and Transformative Assessment in Schools","authors":"W. Au","doi":"10.14288/CE.V8I13.186313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Schools in the United States are inundated with high-stakes, standardized tests, which are used as the central tool for educational policy and accountability systems there - often under the guise of promoting racial justice and civil rights. In this article the author uses empirical research on the impact of high-stakes to argue that, rather than promote educational equality, high-stakes testing in fact causes harm to working class and Black and Brown students as a form of retributive justice, which seeks to punish \"wrongdoers\" rather than addressing the actual material issues and conditions that contribute to educational achievement. Alternativey, in this article the author suggests that we can conceive of forms of restorative and transformative assessment that can be healing to our schools and communities as well as activist in nature.","PeriodicalId":10808,"journal":{"name":"Critical Education","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14288/CE.V8I13.186313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Schools in the United States are inundated with high-stakes, standardized tests, which are used as the central tool for educational policy and accountability systems there - often under the guise of promoting racial justice and civil rights. In this article the author uses empirical research on the impact of high-stakes to argue that, rather than promote educational equality, high-stakes testing in fact causes harm to working class and Black and Brown students as a form of retributive justice, which seeks to punish "wrongdoers" rather than addressing the actual material issues and conditions that contribute to educational achievement. Alternativey, in this article the author suggests that we can conceive of forms of restorative and transformative assessment that can be healing to our schools and communities as well as activist in nature.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们能测试解放吗?从报复性评估到学校的恢复性和变革性评估
美国的学校充斥着高风险的标准化考试,这些考试被用作教育政策和问责制的核心工具——通常打着促进种族正义和公民权利的幌子。在这篇文章中,作者利用对高风险影响的实证研究来论证,高风险考试实际上并没有促进教育平等,而是作为一种报复性正义的形式,对工人阶级和黑人和布朗学生造成了伤害,它旨在惩罚“违法者”,而不是解决有助于教育成就的实际物质问题和条件。另外,在这篇文章中,作者建议我们可以设想一种形式的恢复性和变革性的评估,它可以治愈我们的学校和社区,以及自然界的活动家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Education
Critical Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
30.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Critique of the Critical Critique of Critical Pedagogy: Freire, Suchodolski and the Materialist Pedagogy of Emancipation How to Get a Life: Humanities Education in the age of Neoliberal Exhaustion Teaching as Intellectual Solidarity Academic Ableism and Students with Intellectual/Development Disabilities: “Disabled or Not, People Just Want to Feel Welcome”: Stories of Belonging from College Students with Intellectual Disability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1