OUR RESULTS OF TOTAL HIP ARTROPLASTY WITH ANTEROLATERAL APPROACH

Enes z, R. Sevimli, Harun se
{"title":"OUR RESULTS OF TOTAL HIP ARTROPLASTY WITH ANTEROLATERAL APPROACH","authors":"Enes z, R. Sevimli, Harun se","doi":"10.5455/annalsmedres.2023.01.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: It was aimed to compare the clinical and radiological results of total hip arthroplasty performed with the anterolateral approach with the literature. Material and Method: 65 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty with anterolateral approach between 2016-2021 were included. Preoperative and postoperative functional status evaluations of the patients were performed using the Harris hip score. In the clinical evaluation of the patients, thigh pain, wound infection, length of hospital stay, body mass index, duration of surgery and complications were also evaluated. In the radiological evaluation, the acetabular and femoral relaxation zones, the presence and amount of vertical and horizontal migration of the acetabular component, the presence and amount of femoral vertical migration, the position of the femoral component, the femoral dorr classification, the angle of inclination of the acetabular component and the presence of heterotrophic ossification were examined. Results: Of the patients, 29 (44.6%) were male and 36 (55.4%) were female. The mean age of the patients was 61.65 and the mean follow-up period was 40.2 months. Considering the diagnoses of the patients, THA was applied to 51 (70.8%) patients for coxarthrosis, 14 (19.4%) for avascular necrosis, 5 (6.9%) patients for fractures, and 2 (2.8%) patients for septic arthritis. The mean preoperative Harris Hip Score of the patients was 34.2 (18.1-59.9). The mean postoperative Harris Hip score was 88.5 (68.8-96). When the postoperative Harris Hip Score of the patients was evaluated, 53 (73.6%) were evaluated as excellent results, 18 (25%) as very good results, and 1 (1.4%) as good result. Findings: In our study, the results of total hip arthroplasty performed with the anterolateral approach were found to be a successful and satisfactory surgery when performed with appropriate indications and planning.","PeriodicalId":8248,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Medical Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2023.01.013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim: It was aimed to compare the clinical and radiological results of total hip arthroplasty performed with the anterolateral approach with the literature. Material and Method: 65 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty with anterolateral approach between 2016-2021 were included. Preoperative and postoperative functional status evaluations of the patients were performed using the Harris hip score. In the clinical evaluation of the patients, thigh pain, wound infection, length of hospital stay, body mass index, duration of surgery and complications were also evaluated. In the radiological evaluation, the acetabular and femoral relaxation zones, the presence and amount of vertical and horizontal migration of the acetabular component, the presence and amount of femoral vertical migration, the position of the femoral component, the femoral dorr classification, the angle of inclination of the acetabular component and the presence of heterotrophic ossification were examined. Results: Of the patients, 29 (44.6%) were male and 36 (55.4%) were female. The mean age of the patients was 61.65 and the mean follow-up period was 40.2 months. Considering the diagnoses of the patients, THA was applied to 51 (70.8%) patients for coxarthrosis, 14 (19.4%) for avascular necrosis, 5 (6.9%) patients for fractures, and 2 (2.8%) patients for septic arthritis. The mean preoperative Harris Hip Score of the patients was 34.2 (18.1-59.9). The mean postoperative Harris Hip score was 88.5 (68.8-96). When the postoperative Harris Hip Score of the patients was evaluated, 53 (73.6%) were evaluated as excellent results, 18 (25%) as very good results, and 1 (1.4%) as good result. Findings: In our study, the results of total hip arthroplasty performed with the anterolateral approach were found to be a successful and satisfactory surgery when performed with appropriate indications and planning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前外侧入路全髋关节置换术的结果
目的:比较前外侧入路全髋关节置换术的临床和影像学结果与文献资料。材料和方法:纳入2016-2021年间行前外侧入路全髋关节置换术的65例患者。术前和术后功能状态评估采用Harris髋关节评分。在临床评价中,还对患者的大腿疼痛、伤口感染、住院时间、体重指数、手术时间和并发症进行了评价。在放射学评估中,检查了髋臼和股骨松弛区、髋臼组件垂直和水平移动的存在和量、股垂直移动的存在和量、股组件的位置、股背分类、髋臼组件的倾斜角和异养骨化的存在。结果:男性29例(44.6%),女性36例(55.4%)。患者平均年龄61.65岁,平均随访时间40.2个月。考虑到患者的诊断,关节关节病51例(70.8%),缺血性坏死14例(19.4%),骨折5例(6.9%),脓毒性关节炎2例(2.8%)。患者术前Harris髋关节评分平均值为34.2(18.1-59.9)。术后Harris髋关节平均评分为88.5(68.8-96)。在对患者进行术后Harris髋关节评分时,53例(73.6%)评价为优秀,18例(25%)评价为非常好,1例(1.4%)评价为良好。结果:在我们的研究中,采用前外侧入路进行全髋关节置换术的结果发现,在适当的适应症和计划下进行手术是成功和令人满意的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The correlation between vitamin D levels and inflammation, as well as the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), in people who are over the age of 60. Anxiety, Depression and Coping Styles in Mothers of Children with Cow's Milk Protein Allergy The relationship between spousal support and depression, anxiety, stress, and prenatal attachment in high-risk pregnancies Comparison of serum iron, hemoglobin, ferritin and crp levels in prostate cancer patients with a control group Running title: Serum iron levels in prostate cancer Investigation of Electrocardiogram and Inflammation Parameters in Patients with First Episode Mania
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1