LIES, DECEITS, MANIPULATIONS, AND OTHER FORMS OF AESTHETIC EXPRESSION IN HORACE, SATIRES 2.5

IF 0.2 4区 历史学 0 CLASSICS RAMUS-CRITICAL STUDIES IN GREEK AND ROMAN LITERATURE Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1017/rmu.2022.12
A. Horne
{"title":"LIES, DECEITS, MANIPULATIONS, AND OTHER FORMS OF AESTHETIC EXPRESSION IN HORACE, SATIRES 2.5","authors":"A. Horne","doi":"10.1017/rmu.2022.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Finagling an inheritance is one time-tested way of resolving a money shortage: just flatter your way into the good graces of the aged and rich. In Satires 2.5 Horace parodies the Roman version of this vice, known as captatio or ‘legacy-hunting’; with baroque imagination, he presents Odysseus, the mythological hero, consulting the prophet Tiresias in the Underworld and learning how to increase his fortune by amassing inheritances. Odysseus asks: tu protinus, unde | diuitias aerisque ruam, dic, augur, aceruos (‘tell me forthwith, prophet, where I can dig up riches and heaps of money’, 21f.). Tiresias responds: captes astutus ubique | testamenta senum (‘cleverly snatch on all sides the testaments of old men’, 23f.). Social critique naturally looms large in this poem about venal dishonesty. In major studies, Niall Rudd and Klaus Sallmann have examined the poem's criticism of contemporary Roman society, and later scholars have taken a similar line, often reading the poem as a send-up of flattery. All true, but there is more to say. Even as it treats of wills, money, and flattery, the satire also shows a quiet concern with aesthetic issues, especially the state of contemporary poetry.","PeriodicalId":43863,"journal":{"name":"RAMUS-CRITICAL STUDIES IN GREEK AND ROMAN LITERATURE","volume":"108 1","pages":"203 - 223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RAMUS-CRITICAL STUDIES IN GREEK AND ROMAN LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/rmu.2022.12","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Finagling an inheritance is one time-tested way of resolving a money shortage: just flatter your way into the good graces of the aged and rich. In Satires 2.5 Horace parodies the Roman version of this vice, known as captatio or ‘legacy-hunting’; with baroque imagination, he presents Odysseus, the mythological hero, consulting the prophet Tiresias in the Underworld and learning how to increase his fortune by amassing inheritances. Odysseus asks: tu protinus, unde | diuitias aerisque ruam, dic, augur, aceruos (‘tell me forthwith, prophet, where I can dig up riches and heaps of money’, 21f.). Tiresias responds: captes astutus ubique | testamenta senum (‘cleverly snatch on all sides the testaments of old men’, 23f.). Social critique naturally looms large in this poem about venal dishonesty. In major studies, Niall Rudd and Klaus Sallmann have examined the poem's criticism of contemporary Roman society, and later scholars have taken a similar line, often reading the poem as a send-up of flattery. All true, but there is more to say. Even as it treats of wills, money, and flattery, the satire also shows a quiet concern with aesthetic issues, especially the state of contemporary poetry.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谎言,欺骗,操纵,和其他形式的美学表达,讽刺
骗取遗产是一种久经考验的解决资金短缺的方法:用谄媚的方式赢得老年人和富人的青睐。在《讽刺诗》第2.5章中,贺拉斯模仿了这种恶习的罗马版本,被称为captatio或“遗产狩猎”;他以巴洛克式的想象力描绘了神话中的英雄奥德修斯,他向冥界的先知泰雷西斯请教,学习如何通过积累遗产来增加自己的财富。奥德修斯问:tu protinus, unde diuitias aerisque ruam, dic, augur, aceruos(“先知,请立即告诉我,我在哪里可以挖到财富和成堆的钱”,第21页)。泰瑞西亚斯的回应是:captes astutus ubique | testamenta senum(“巧妙地从四面八方抢夺老人的遗嘱”,23页)。在这首关于贪污不诚实的诗中,社会批判自然显得很突出。在主要的研究中,尼尔·路德和克劳斯·萨尔曼研究了这首诗对当代罗马社会的批评,后来的学者也采取了类似的立场,经常把这首诗解读为对奉承的讽刺。都是真的,但还有更多要说的。即使它对待遗嘱,金钱和奉承,讽刺也表现出对审美问题的安静关注,特别是当代诗歌的状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
CONFLICT, TRAGEDY, AND INTERRACIALITY: BOB THOMPSON PAINTS VERGIL'S CAMILLA THE THIRD LIFECYCLE OF PHILOKLEON IN ARISTOPHANES’ WASPS METAGENRE AND THE COMPETENT AUDIENCE OF PLAUTUS’ CAPTIVI ERASING THE AETHIOPIAN IN CICERO'S POST REDITUM IN SENATU RMU volume 51 issue 2 Cover and Back matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1