Controlled hypotension for functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a Comparative study between magnesium sulfate and nitroglycerin

R. Shoukry, A. Mahmoud
{"title":"Controlled hypotension for functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a Comparative study between magnesium sulfate and nitroglycerin","authors":"R. Shoukry, A. Mahmoud","doi":"10.4103/asja.asja_46_16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Intraoperative bleeding during functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) leads to poor visibility of the surgical field, and is of major concern. Controlled hypotension, using a variety of pharmacological agents, during general anesthesia reduces blood loss and helps clear visibility of the surgical field during FESS. The aim of this study was to compare the surgical conditions for FESS during controlled hypotension provided by nitroglycerin (NTG) versus magnesium sulfate (MGS) under general anesthesia. Patients and methods Fifty adult patients of both sexes requiring FESS under general anesthesia were randomly divided to receive either NTG infusion of 3–5 µg/kg/min (group NTG, n=25) or MGS (group MGS, n=25) 30 mg/kg, administered as a slow intravenous bolus and 10 mg/kg/h by continuous infusion during the operation, to provide controlled hypotension. In both the groups, the mean arterial blood pressure was reduced until the targeted mean arterial blood pressure (55–65 mmHg) was achieved. Results Both drugs produced the desired hypotension, in the magnesium group there were better operative conditions, reduction in the duration of surgery (85.3±13.1 vs. 92.9±10.3 min) and reduced anesthetic requirements [average end-tidal sevoflurane concentration (vol %) and fentanyl consumption (μg); P<0.0001]. However, there was longer extubation time (10.0±2.9 vs. 5.5±2.3 min) and recovery time (16.7±4.4 vs. 9.8±2.3 min) in comparison with the NTG group. Heart rate values were significantly higher in the NTG group compared with the magnesium group (P<0.0004). Conclusion Both NTG and MGS can be used safely to provide controlled hypotension during FESS. However, MGS was better as it provided optimum surgical condition and less tachycardia. In addition, it led to decreased anesthetic requirements.","PeriodicalId":7492,"journal":{"name":"Ain-Shams Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"91 - 96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ain-Shams Journal of Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/asja.asja_46_16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background Intraoperative bleeding during functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) leads to poor visibility of the surgical field, and is of major concern. Controlled hypotension, using a variety of pharmacological agents, during general anesthesia reduces blood loss and helps clear visibility of the surgical field during FESS. The aim of this study was to compare the surgical conditions for FESS during controlled hypotension provided by nitroglycerin (NTG) versus magnesium sulfate (MGS) under general anesthesia. Patients and methods Fifty adult patients of both sexes requiring FESS under general anesthesia were randomly divided to receive either NTG infusion of 3–5 µg/kg/min (group NTG, n=25) or MGS (group MGS, n=25) 30 mg/kg, administered as a slow intravenous bolus and 10 mg/kg/h by continuous infusion during the operation, to provide controlled hypotension. In both the groups, the mean arterial blood pressure was reduced until the targeted mean arterial blood pressure (55–65 mmHg) was achieved. Results Both drugs produced the desired hypotension, in the magnesium group there were better operative conditions, reduction in the duration of surgery (85.3±13.1 vs. 92.9±10.3 min) and reduced anesthetic requirements [average end-tidal sevoflurane concentration (vol %) and fentanyl consumption (μg); P<0.0001]. However, there was longer extubation time (10.0±2.9 vs. 5.5±2.3 min) and recovery time (16.7±4.4 vs. 9.8±2.3 min) in comparison with the NTG group. Heart rate values were significantly higher in the NTG group compared with the magnesium group (P<0.0004). Conclusion Both NTG and MGS can be used safely to provide controlled hypotension during FESS. However, MGS was better as it provided optimum surgical condition and less tachycardia. In addition, it led to decreased anesthetic requirements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术控制低血压:硫酸镁与硝酸甘油的比较研究
背景:功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术(FESS)术中出血导致手术视野不清晰,是一个主要的问题。在全身麻醉期间,使用多种药物控制低血压,减少失血,并有助于在FESS期间清晰手术视野。本研究的目的是比较全身麻醉下硝酸甘油(NTG)和硫酸镁(MGS)提供的控制性低血压期间FESS的手术条件。患者和方法50例需要全麻FESS的成年患者,随机分为两组,分别给予3-5µg/kg/min的NTG (NTG组,n=25)和30 mg/kg的MGS (MGS组,n=25),术中缓慢静脉滴注,10 mg/kg/h,持续滴注,以控制低血压。在两组中,平均动脉血压都有所降低,直到达到目标平均动脉血压(55-65 mmHg)。结果两种药物均达到预期降压效果,镁组手术条件较好,手术时间缩短(85.3±13.1 vs 92.9±10.3 min),麻醉需用量[平均潮末七氟醚浓度(vol %)和芬太尼用量(μg)]减少;P < 0.0001)。但拔管时间(10.0±2.9 vs. 5.5±2.3 min)和恢复时间(16.7±4.4 vs. 9.8±2.3 min)较NTG组明显延长。NTG组心率值显著高于镁组(P<0.0004)。结论NTG和MGS均可安全用于FESS术中控制性降压。然而,MGS的效果更好,因为它提供了最佳的手术条件和较少的心动过速。此外,它还减少了麻醉需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Management of early postoperative hypoxemia: a comparative performance of Hudson face mask with nasal prongs Aprepitant for attenuation of postoperative nausea and vomiting with a decrease in postoperative analgesic needs after laparoscopic surgery Awake orotracheal intubation using fiberoptic bronchoscope versus Airtraq laryngoscope in morbidly obese patients Tramadol versus hyoscine-N-butylbromide as intrapartum analgesics during the first stage of labor Effect of dexmedetomidine infusion on desflurane requirement and perioperative hemodynamic changes during laparoscopic gastric sleeve operations: a study based on entropy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1