From waiting to preparing: A qualitative feasibility study of cancer patients’ perspectives on prehabilitation

A. Beck, H. V. Thaysen, C. Soegaard, J. Blaakær, L. Seibæk
{"title":"From waiting to preparing: A qualitative feasibility study of cancer patients’ perspectives on prehabilitation","authors":"A. Beck, H. V. Thaysen, C. Soegaard, J. Blaakær, L. Seibæk","doi":"10.5750/EJPCH.V7I3.1738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The aim of the study was to investigate cancer patients’ perspectives on a pre-defined, home-based, multimodal prehabilitation programme with particular attention to feasibility and acceptability. Patients and methods: Fifteen patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal or ovarian origin undergoing complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS), with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), participated in semi-structured interviews. Malterud’s principles of systematic text condensation were used to analyse the data. Results: Patients had a positive attitude towards home-based prehabilitation, primarily because of the opportunity to influence recovery, but also because it could distract their attention from negative thoughts and because they could gain support. However, they would not follow the programme unconditionally and significant barriers to adherence were identified. These included lack of belief, everyday life, preferences and restrictions . Conclusion: Patients’ perspectives on home-based prehabilitation contribute new knowledge concerning barriers to adherence to a programme. The findings underscore the complexity of developing a home-based, multimodal prehabilitation programme that not only enhances functional capacity, but is also experienced relevant to the patients and aligns with the demands of their everyday lives.","PeriodicalId":72966,"journal":{"name":"European journal for person centered healthcare","volume":"73 1","pages":"443-453"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal for person centered healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5750/EJPCH.V7I3.1738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to investigate cancer patients’ perspectives on a pre-defined, home-based, multimodal prehabilitation programme with particular attention to feasibility and acceptability. Patients and methods: Fifteen patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal or ovarian origin undergoing complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS), with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), participated in semi-structured interviews. Malterud’s principles of systematic text condensation were used to analyse the data. Results: Patients had a positive attitude towards home-based prehabilitation, primarily because of the opportunity to influence recovery, but also because it could distract their attention from negative thoughts and because they could gain support. However, they would not follow the programme unconditionally and significant barriers to adherence were identified. These included lack of belief, everyday life, preferences and restrictions . Conclusion: Patients’ perspectives on home-based prehabilitation contribute new knowledge concerning barriers to adherence to a programme. The findings underscore the complexity of developing a home-based, multimodal prehabilitation programme that not only enhances functional capacity, but is also experienced relevant to the patients and aligns with the demands of their everyday lives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从等待到准备:癌症患者康复观点的质性可行性研究
背景:本研究的目的是调查癌症患者对预先定义的、以家庭为基础的、多模式的康复方案的看法,特别关注可行性和可接受性。患者与方法:采用半结构化访谈法,对15例行完全细胞减缩手术(CRS)伴或不伴腹腔热化疗(HIPEC)的结直肠或卵巢源性腹膜癌患者进行访谈。采用马尔特鲁德的系统文本浓缩原理对数据进行分析。结果:患者对家庭康复持积极态度,主要是因为有机会影响康复,但也因为它可以分散他们的注意力,从消极的想法,因为他们可以获得支持。但是,他们不会无条件地遵守方案,并且确定了遵守方案的重大障碍。这些因素包括缺乏信仰、日常生活、偏好和限制。结论:患者对以家庭为基础的康复的观点提供了关于坚持计划障碍的新知识。研究结果强调了开发以家庭为基础的多模式康复计划的复杂性,该计划不仅可以提高功能能力,而且还与患者相关,并与他们的日常生活需求保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The ethical and epistemic roles of narrative in person-centred healthcare Person-Centred Healthcare versus Patient Centricity - what is the difference and how are pharmaceutical companies aiming to secure internal representation of the patient voice? Moving past phronesis: clinical reasoning in person-centered care Persons over models: shared decision-making for person-centered medicine lifestyle and degeneracy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1