From a “Double Task” to a “Double Contention” Perspective

Q2 Social Sciences Contention Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.3167/cont.2022.100103
Júnia Marúsia Trigueiro de Lima
{"title":"From a “Double Task” to a “Double Contention” Perspective","authors":"Júnia Marúsia Trigueiro de Lima","doi":"10.3167/cont.2022.100103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Brazil, many anthropologists are encouraged to act for the benefit of minority groups, assuming an activist role in conducting research on and with them. Yet efforts to integrate these dual roles are undermined by the continued separation of scientific knowledge production processes from other scholar activist activities. In this article, I seek to contend this separation by reflecting on my work as a volunteer in medios libres (the “free media”). With this form of activism, I sought to support the Mexican Indigenous social movement Modevite alongside my doctoral research, in a process of double contention. I reflect on the possibilities of rethinking the activism–academia dichotomy in knowledge production and on how we can produce knowledge that is more strategic for the people we engage with.","PeriodicalId":36466,"journal":{"name":"Contention","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/cont.2022.100103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Brazil, many anthropologists are encouraged to act for the benefit of minority groups, assuming an activist role in conducting research on and with them. Yet efforts to integrate these dual roles are undermined by the continued separation of scientific knowledge production processes from other scholar activist activities. In this article, I seek to contend this separation by reflecting on my work as a volunteer in medios libres (the “free media”). With this form of activism, I sought to support the Mexican Indigenous social movement Modevite alongside my doctoral research, in a process of double contention. I reflect on the possibilities of rethinking the activism–academia dichotomy in knowledge production and on how we can produce knowledge that is more strategic for the people we engage with.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从“双重任务”到“双重争夺”的视角
在巴西,许多人类学家被鼓励为少数群体的利益而行动,在对他们进行研究并与他们一起进行研究时扮演积极分子的角色。然而,整合这些双重角色的努力被科学知识生产过程与其他学者活动的持续分离所破坏。在这篇文章中,我试图通过反思我作为medios libres(“自由媒体”)志愿者的工作来反驳这种分离。通过这种形式的行动主义,我试图在我的博士研究的同时支持墨西哥土著社会运动Modevite,这是一个双重争论的过程。我思考了在知识生产中重新思考激进主义-学术界二分法的可能性,以及我们如何为与我们接触的人提供更具战略意义的知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contention
Contention Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
On Violence, Race, and Social Theory A Checkerboard of Ethnoracial Violence The Political Economy of Learning in Agrarian Contention Goals, Strategies, and Tactics Peaceful or Disciplined?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1