Ethno-linguistic problems and prospects in educational sphere of the Russian Republics (the case of Bashkortostan)

E. Arutyunova
{"title":"Ethno-linguistic problems and prospects in educational sphere of the Russian Republics (the case of Bashkortostan)","authors":"E. Arutyunova","doi":"10.7868/S0132162518040037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents an analysis of ethno-linguistic issues in education in the specific legal context of the Russian republics of Bashkortostan and Tatarstan. The importance of language to the identity of Russian citizens was analyzed using empirical data from a nationwide poll conducted by the Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences as well as expert and in-depth interviews and observations. The results demonstrate high importance of language as an ethnic marker. The main changes of language policy in Russia and in the Russian republics in particular in the post-Soviet era are also discussed. The research indicates that the adoption of language laws in the republics to provide state protection for official languages has shifted the focus of ethno-linguistic issues in the 2000s away from problems stemming from the lack of recognition of language as a constitutional right toward the problems associated with ethnic languages in education. In the case of the Republic of Bashkortostan the author analyzes the key controversies in the field of school education. These concern the functioning of the official languages of the Republic and the first languages, the quality of the educational materials, effectiveness of the teaching of the Bashkir language as an official to all school students of the republic. Differences and similarities in the situations in Bashkortostan and Tatarstan were also identified. Two key discourses in the study and discussion of the problems of ethno-linguistic situations were analyzed. These are the defense discourse and discourse of the free language choice based on the peoples’ pragmatic motives.","PeriodicalId":85741,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of sociological studies","volume":"33 1","pages":"25-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of sociological studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7868/S0132162518040037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article presents an analysis of ethno-linguistic issues in education in the specific legal context of the Russian republics of Bashkortostan and Tatarstan. The importance of language to the identity of Russian citizens was analyzed using empirical data from a nationwide poll conducted by the Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences as well as expert and in-depth interviews and observations. The results demonstrate high importance of language as an ethnic marker. The main changes of language policy in Russia and in the Russian republics in particular in the post-Soviet era are also discussed. The research indicates that the adoption of language laws in the republics to provide state protection for official languages has shifted the focus of ethno-linguistic issues in the 2000s away from problems stemming from the lack of recognition of language as a constitutional right toward the problems associated with ethnic languages in education. In the case of the Republic of Bashkortostan the author analyzes the key controversies in the field of school education. These concern the functioning of the official languages of the Republic and the first languages, the quality of the educational materials, effectiveness of the teaching of the Bashkir language as an official to all school students of the republic. Differences and similarities in the situations in Bashkortostan and Tatarstan were also identified. Two key discourses in the study and discussion of the problems of ethno-linguistic situations were analyzed. These are the defense discourse and discourse of the free language choice based on the peoples’ pragmatic motives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俄罗斯各共和国教育领域的民族语言问题与前景(以巴什科尔托斯坦为例)
本文在俄罗斯巴什科尔托斯坦共和国和鞑靼斯坦共和国的特定法律背景下,对教育中的民族语言问题进行了分析。语言对俄罗斯公民身份认同的重要性是通过俄罗斯科学院社会学研究所进行的全国民意调查的经验数据以及专家和深度访谈和观察来分析的。结果表明语言作为种族标记的重要性。本文还讨论了后苏联时代俄罗斯和各俄罗斯共和国语言政策的主要变化。研究表明,各共和国通过语言法为官方语言提供国家保护,将2000年代民族语言问题的焦点从缺乏对语言作为一项宪法权利的承认转向了与教育中民族语言相关的问题。以巴什科尔托斯坦共和国为例,作者分析了学校教育领域的主要争议。这些问题涉及共和国官方语言和第一语言的功能、教材的质量、向共和国所有学校学生教授巴什基尔语作为官方语言的有效性。还确定了巴什科尔托斯坦和鞑靼斯坦局势的异同。分析了研究和讨论民族语言情境问题的两个关键话语。这是基于人们语用动机的防御性话语和自由语言选择话语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Оккультизм в сознании горожан Казахстана Опыт перехода российских компаний на удалённую работу в ситуации пандемии The Elderly and Physical Activity: A Qualitative Method The Strong Program in Cultural Sociology: Balancing between Culturalism and Scientism Sociology and Military Studies: Broadening the Perspective, Using the Classics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1