Between global competition, marketing, deviant play, and cheating - High-end raiding in ‘World of Warcraft’

Q1 Social Sciences Comunicacion y Sociedad Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI:10.26350/001200_000007
Patrick Prax
{"title":"Between global competition, marketing, deviant play, and cheating - High-end raiding in ‘World of Warcraft’","authors":"Patrick Prax","doi":"10.26350/001200_000007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article uses the example of high-end raiding in the online game World of Warcraft to investigate the power relationships between players and producers and to examine how the notion of struggle can inform an understanding of co-creative game design. The study is based on a recently published dissertation work and complemented by an interview with two expert interviewees. The results of the study show that while game designers still have a de-facto power position in that they can ban guilds, however, producers are not seen as legitimate when exercising this power. Instead raiding guilds are reluctantly refereeing their game themselves and treat the game company at times even as an inconvenience to be played around. This participatory power is not given to raiders but it is the outcome of a struggle with the producers of the game. Raiders also explicitly criticize the exploitation of their labor in game testing.","PeriodicalId":35210,"journal":{"name":"Comunicacion y Sociedad","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comunicacion y Sociedad","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26350/001200_000007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This article uses the example of high-end raiding in the online game World of Warcraft to investigate the power relationships between players and producers and to examine how the notion of struggle can inform an understanding of co-creative game design. The study is based on a recently published dissertation work and complemented by an interview with two expert interviewees. The results of the study show that while game designers still have a de-facto power position in that they can ban guilds, however, producers are not seen as legitimate when exercising this power. Instead raiding guilds are reluctantly refereeing their game themselves and treat the game company at times even as an inconvenience to be played around. This participatory power is not given to raiders but it is the outcome of a struggle with the producers of the game. Raiders also explicitly criticize the exploitation of their labor in game testing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在全球竞争、市场营销、越轨游戏和作弊之间——《魔兽世界》的高端突袭
本文以在线游戏《魔兽世界》中的高端突袭为例,调查玩家和制作人之间的权力关系,并研究斗争的概念如何影响对共同创意游戏设计的理解。该研究基于最近发表的论文工作,并辅以对两位专家受访者的采访。研究结果表明,虽然游戏设计师仍然拥有事实上的权力,因为他们可以禁止公会,但制作人在行使这种权力时却不被视为合法。相反地,公会并不情愿自己去裁判他们的游戏,有时甚至会把游戏公司当成一种麻烦。这种参与性力量并不是给予掠夺者的,而是与游戏制作人斗争的结果。Raiders也明确批评了他们在游戏测试中的劳动剥削。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Comunicacion y Sociedad
Comunicacion y Sociedad Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The historical coverage of televised media events in print media: The Case of the Eurovision Song Contest Framing China: The Belt and Road Initiative in Argentine national media outlets Personal Agenda-Public Agenda Congruency: A Contingent Condition for Agenda-setting Effects The Genesis and Self-Reliance of Indonesian Local Game Developers as the National Creative Workers in Contemporary Indonesia Crowdfunding in the production of video games in Spain: Evolution and success on Kickstarter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1