Linguo-Conceptual Studies of Literary Text: Evolution of Theoretical and Methodological Approaches

I. Kononova, T. A. Pruczkikh
{"title":"Linguo-Conceptual Studies of Literary Text: Evolution of Theoretical and Methodological Approaches","authors":"I. Kononova, T. A. Pruczkikh","doi":"10.32603/2412-8562-2023-9-3-150-164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The  article  presents  the  results  of  an  analytical  review  of  scientific  papers reflecting  the  stages  of  formation  and  development  of  cognitive  poetics  as  an interdisciplinary  research  area  in  Russian  linguistics.  The  purpose  of  the  article  is  to systematize and critically analyze approaches, concepts and methodological principles of the study of concepts that constitute the cognitive basis of literary texts, authors’ idiostyles and, by extension, of poetic sociolects and literary genres.Methodology  and  sources. The  paper  reviews  theoretical  concepts  and  approaches (developed by R. Tsur, P. Stockwell, I.A. Tarasova, N.S. Bolotnova, L.O. Butakova, etc.), which served as the foundations of cognitive poetics. A comparative analysis of works focusing on the structure of literary concepts, their textual representation aspect and categorization criteria is carried out. The studies which concentrate on the application of corpus methods in order to analyze literary texts, including the works by B. Fischer-Starcke, D. Siepmann, A. Stefanowitsch, M. Mahlberg, etc., also formed the methodological basis for the analytical review.Results and discussion. As a result of the review study, the evolution of theoretical and methodological  approaches  to  literary  concepts  and  literary  texts’  ideospheres  is demonstrated. The main concepts that influenced the formation of cognitive poetics are identified; the relevant problems of cognitive studies of poetic and prose texts are analyzed. It’s  shown  that  it  is  necessary  to  further  consider  the  problem  of  identifying  dominant concepts of authors’ idiostyles describing cognitive mechanisms that underlie the semantic variability of individual concepts. The importance of using corpus methodology in the study of literary discourse in its synchronic and diachronic perspective is discussed.Conclusion. It is shown that, despite the fact that the author's creative consciousness has been  studied  intensively  and  for  a  long  time  in  Russian  cognitive  poetics,  there  are  still problems  that  need  further  consideration.  The  following  aspects  must  be  analyzed:  the criteria for choosing the method of modeling a literary concept, taking into consideration its type; the elaboration of uniform terminology in existing approaches; the development of the algorithms for describing the structure of literary concepts and identifying conceptual dominants  of  authors’  ideospheres.  A  conclusion  was  made  regarding  the  potential  of applying  corpus  research  methods  in  the  field  of  cognitive  poetics.  A  range  of  the  tasks related to the cognitive research of literary texts that could be solved by using statistical methods of corpus linguistics was determined.","PeriodicalId":75784,"journal":{"name":"Dental Discourse","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Discourse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2023-9-3-150-164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The  article  presents  the  results  of  an  analytical  review  of  scientific  papers reflecting  the  stages  of  formation  and  development  of  cognitive  poetics  as  an interdisciplinary  research  area  in  Russian  linguistics.  The  purpose  of  the  article  is  to systematize and critically analyze approaches, concepts and methodological principles of the study of concepts that constitute the cognitive basis of literary texts, authors’ idiostyles and, by extension, of poetic sociolects and literary genres.Methodology  and  sources. The  paper  reviews  theoretical  concepts  and  approaches (developed by R. Tsur, P. Stockwell, I.A. Tarasova, N.S. Bolotnova, L.O. Butakova, etc.), which served as the foundations of cognitive poetics. A comparative analysis of works focusing on the structure of literary concepts, their textual representation aspect and categorization criteria is carried out. The studies which concentrate on the application of corpus methods in order to analyze literary texts, including the works by B. Fischer-Starcke, D. Siepmann, A. Stefanowitsch, M. Mahlberg, etc., also formed the methodological basis for the analytical review.Results and discussion. As a result of the review study, the evolution of theoretical and methodological  approaches  to  literary  concepts  and  literary  texts’  ideospheres  is demonstrated. The main concepts that influenced the formation of cognitive poetics are identified; the relevant problems of cognitive studies of poetic and prose texts are analyzed. It’s  shown  that  it  is  necessary  to  further  consider  the  problem  of  identifying  dominant concepts of authors’ idiostyles describing cognitive mechanisms that underlie the semantic variability of individual concepts. The importance of using corpus methodology in the study of literary discourse in its synchronic and diachronic perspective is discussed.Conclusion. It is shown that, despite the fact that the author's creative consciousness has been  studied  intensively  and  for  a  long  time  in  Russian  cognitive  poetics,  there  are  still problems  that  need  further  consideration.  The  following  aspects  must  be  analyzed:  the criteria for choosing the method of modeling a literary concept, taking into consideration its type; the elaboration of uniform terminology in existing approaches; the development of the algorithms for describing the structure of literary concepts and identifying conceptual dominants  of  authors’  ideospheres.  A  conclusion  was  made  regarding  the  potential  of applying  corpus  research  methods  in  the  field  of  cognitive  poetics.  A  range  of  the  tasks related to the cognitive research of literary texts that could be solved by using statistical methods of corpus linguistics was determined.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文学文本的语言概念研究:理论和方法方法的演变
介绍。本文对俄罗斯语言学中认知诗学作为一个跨学科研究领域的形成和发展阶段的科学论文进行了分析综述。本文的目的是系统化和批判性地分析概念研究的方法、概念和方法论原则,这些概念构成了文学文本、作者风格以及诗歌社会和文学体裁的认知基础。方法和来源。本文回顾了r.t surr、p.s tokwell、I.A. Tarasova、N.S. Bolotnova、L.O. Butakova等人提出的作为认知诗学基础的理论概念和方法。从文学概念的结构、文本表现方面和分类标准等方面对作品进行比较分析。集中于运用语料库方法分析文学文本的研究,包括B. Fischer-Starcke、D. Siepmann、A. stefanwitsch、M. Mahlberg等人的作品,也构成了分析评论的方法论基础。结果和讨论。作为回顾研究的结果,文学概念和文学文本意识形态的理论和方法方法的演变被展示出来。确定了影响认知诗学形成的主要概念;分析了诗文文本认知研究的相关问题。研究表明,有必要进一步考虑识别作者独特风格的主导概念的问题,这些独特风格描述了个体概念语义变异性背后的认知机制。从共时和历时的角度探讨了语料库方法论在文学话语研究中的重要性。研究表明,尽管俄罗斯认知诗学对作者的创作意识进行了长期深入的研究,但仍存在一些需要进一步思考的问题。必须从以下几个方面进行分析:选择塑造文学概念的方法的标准,考虑文学概念的类型;在现有办法中拟订统一的术语;描述文学概念结构和识别作者意识形态的概念支配的算法的发展。最后,对语料库研究方法在认知诗学领域的应用前景进行了展望。确定了一系列与文学文本认知研究相关的任务,这些任务可以用语料库语言学的统计方法来解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Human Sciences: Another Experience of Substantiating Socio-Humanitarian Knowledge Logical and Historical Aspects of the Genesis of Russian Sociology (on the Example of N.Ya. Danilevsky and N.K. Mikhailovsky) Social Relations of IT Professionals with Other Professional Groups: Network Modeling and Results of Empirical Analysis The Talk about the History of the Treuhandanstalt. Interview with Markus Böick. Part 1 Søren Kierkegaard’s “Man in Search of God” as a Cultural and Anthropological Type
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1