Evidence-based policing and police receptivity to research: evidence from Taiwan

IF 1.4 3区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Policing-An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management Pub Date : 2022-07-12 DOI:10.1108/pijpsm-04-2022-0050
Kenghui Lin, A. Sidebottom, R. Wortley
{"title":"Evidence-based policing and police receptivity to research: evidence from Taiwan","authors":"Kenghui Lin, A. Sidebottom, R. Wortley","doi":"10.1108/pijpsm-04-2022-0050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper aims to investigate how evidence-based policing (EBP) is understood by police officers and citizens in Taiwan and the influence of police education on police recruit's receptivity to research evidence in policing.Design/methodology/approachThe study uses a cross-sectional design that includes Taiwanese police officers (n = 671) and a control group of Taiwanese criminology undergraduate students (n = 85). A research instrument covering five themes is developed, and after a pilot test the final scale remains 14 items.FindingsThe analysis suggests that police officers in Taiwan generally hold a positive view towards the role of research and researchers in policing, more so than is often observed in similar studies conducted in Western countries. Receptivity to research was found to be significantly higher among the non-police sample compared to the police sample. Moreover, time spent in police education was significantly associated with lower levels of receptivity to research.Originality/valueThe paper makes two original contributions to the literature on police officer receptivity to research. It is the first paper to (1) empirically examine police officers' openness to, and use of research in an Asian setting and (2) to compare police officers' receptivity to research with those of a relevant non-police group.","PeriodicalId":47881,"journal":{"name":"Policing-An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policing-An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/pijpsm-04-2022-0050","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to investigate how evidence-based policing (EBP) is understood by police officers and citizens in Taiwan and the influence of police education on police recruit's receptivity to research evidence in policing.Design/methodology/approachThe study uses a cross-sectional design that includes Taiwanese police officers (n = 671) and a control group of Taiwanese criminology undergraduate students (n = 85). A research instrument covering five themes is developed, and after a pilot test the final scale remains 14 items.FindingsThe analysis suggests that police officers in Taiwan generally hold a positive view towards the role of research and researchers in policing, more so than is often observed in similar studies conducted in Western countries. Receptivity to research was found to be significantly higher among the non-police sample compared to the police sample. Moreover, time spent in police education was significantly associated with lower levels of receptivity to research.Originality/valueThe paper makes two original contributions to the literature on police officer receptivity to research. It is the first paper to (1) empirically examine police officers' openness to, and use of research in an Asian setting and (2) to compare police officers' receptivity to research with those of a relevant non-police group.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
循证警务与警察接受研究:来自台湾的证据
目的本研究旨在探讨台湾警察与民众对循证警务的认知,以及警察教育对新警员警务研究证据接受度的影响。设计/方法/方法本研究采用横断面设计,包括台湾警察(n = 671)和台湾犯罪学本科生(n = 85)作为对照组。一个涵盖五个主题的研究工具被开发出来,经过试点测试后,最终的量表仍然是14个项目。研究结果分析表明,台湾的警察普遍对研究人员在警务中的作用持积极态度,这比在西方国家进行的类似研究中经常观察到的要多。研究发现,与警察样本相比,非警察样本的研究接受度明显更高。此外,花在警察教育上的时间与较低的研究接受程度显著相关。本文对警员接受性研究的文献有两个原创性的贡献。这是第一篇论文:(1)在亚洲背景下实证检验警察对研究的开放程度和使用情况;(2)将警察对研究的接受程度与相关的非警察群体进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
15.00%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: ■Community policing ■Managerial styles and leadership ■Performance measurement and accountability ■Pursuit guidelines ■Crime trends and analysis ■Crisis negotiation ■Civil disorder ■Organized crime ■Victimology ■Crime prevention ■Career development ■High risk police activities ■Routine policing ■Traffic enforcement ■Civil litigation.
期刊最新文献
How can we help law enforcement agencies learn? A look at CALEA police accreditation Crime on the mass transit system in Hong Kong: a hotspots and harmspots trajectory approach Does Weisburd's law of crime concentration apply to traffic crashes? Implications for policing and traffic law enforcement How the police conceptualise and view the relevance of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) for policing: a qualitative investigation Compliments or complaints: an evaluation of a community oriented policing practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1