Business as UNusual: The Implications of Fossil Divestment and Green Bonds for Financial Flows, Economic Growth and Energy Market

S. Glomsrød, T. Wei
{"title":"Business as UNusual: The Implications of Fossil Divestment and Green Bonds for Financial Flows, Economic Growth and Energy Market","authors":"S. Glomsrød, T. Wei","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2733423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Green bonds and fossil divestment has emerged as a bottom-up approach to climate action within the business community. Recent pledges by large banks and institutional investors have reached levels that have the potential to contribute markedly to a low carbon transition. This paper traces the impact of green finance in a multiregional global general equilibrium model with non-fossil and non-coal segments of financial flows in addition to the usual unconstrained market for funding. Our high green finance scenario reflects a reasonable upscaling of current level of pledges towards 2030. The study shows that green finance shifts the investments towards industries generating more value added and increasing GDP, future savings and investments. The green finance leads to a lower return on investments and a transfer of income from investors to wage income. Russia and China see the largest cost increase in coal investments due to constraints on finance for fossil industries. The green finance reduces coal consumption by 2.5 per cent below BAU in 2030 and raises the share of non-fossil electricity from 42 to 46 per cent at the global level. Over the whole period towards 2030, the green finance avoids global CO2 emissions corresponding to the total emissions of European Union and Japan in a recent year.","PeriodicalId":12584,"journal":{"name":"Global Commodity Issues eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"95","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Commodity Issues eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2733423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 95

Abstract

Green bonds and fossil divestment has emerged as a bottom-up approach to climate action within the business community. Recent pledges by large banks and institutional investors have reached levels that have the potential to contribute markedly to a low carbon transition. This paper traces the impact of green finance in a multiregional global general equilibrium model with non-fossil and non-coal segments of financial flows in addition to the usual unconstrained market for funding. Our high green finance scenario reflects a reasonable upscaling of current level of pledges towards 2030. The study shows that green finance shifts the investments towards industries generating more value added and increasing GDP, future savings and investments. The green finance leads to a lower return on investments and a transfer of income from investors to wage income. Russia and China see the largest cost increase in coal investments due to constraints on finance for fossil industries. The green finance reduces coal consumption by 2.5 per cent below BAU in 2030 and raises the share of non-fossil electricity from 42 to 46 per cent at the global level. Over the whole period towards 2030, the green finance avoids global CO2 emissions corresponding to the total emissions of European Union and Japan in a recent year.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不寻常的商业:化石资产撤资和绿色债券对资金流动、经济增长和能源市场的影响
在商界,绿色债券和化石燃料撤资已经成为一种自下而上的气候行动方式。最近,大型银行和机构投资者的承诺已经达到了有可能为低碳转型做出显著贡献的水平。本文在一个多区域全球一般均衡模型中追踪了绿色金融的影响,除了通常的无约束融资市场之外,还包括非化石和非煤炭部分的资金流动。我们的高绿色金融情景反映了到2030年目前承诺水平的合理提升。研究表明,绿色金融将投资转向附加值更高、能提高GDP、未来储蓄和投资的行业。绿色金融导致较低的投资回报率和从投资者的收入转移到工资收入。由于化石行业的融资限制,俄罗斯和中国的煤炭投资成本增幅最大。到2030年,绿色金融将使煤炭消费在低于BAU的水平上减少2.5%,并将全球非化石燃料电力的比例从42%提高到46%。在2030年之前的整个时期,绿色金融避免的全球二氧化碳排放量相当于欧盟和日本最近一年的总排放量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Manufacturer Encroachment in a Product Market and Common Ownership between Supply Chain Parties WTO आणि ग्रामीण विकासात कृषी (Agriculture in the WTO and Rural Development) Mechanics of Global Value Chains: India's Perspective A Block-Chain of Things (BcoT) Based System for Detecting Counterfeit Products in Supply Chain Management Are commodity futures a hedge against inflation? A Markov-switching approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1