Adverse Childhood Experiences and Family Resilience Among Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

Mallory Schneider, J. VanOrmer, K. Zlomke
{"title":"Adverse Childhood Experiences and Family Resilience Among Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.","authors":"Mallory Schneider, J. VanOrmer, K. Zlomke","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000000703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\nThe purpose of the present study was to (1) examine the differences in adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) among children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and comorbid ASD/ADHD and healthy neurodevelopmental controls; (2) explore the levels of family resilience across diagnostic categories; (3) identify the differences in family resilience by the number of ACEs; and (4) explore the interaction between ACEs and the diagnostic category on family resilience.\n\n\nMETHOD\nParticipants were 2083 children between the ages of 6 and 17 years (M = 12.23, SD = 3.36) from the 2016 National Survey of Children's Health. The majority of the sample were male (68.7%) and white (78.6%).\n\n\nRESULTS\nOverall, youth diagnosed with solely ADHD had the highest number of ACEs (Madj = 1.94). In addition, individuals who endorsed exposure to 1 ACE reported higher levels of family resilience in comparison to those who reported 0 ACEs or 2 or more ACEs. Family resilience did not differ between youth who experienced 2 or more ACEs and youth who experienced 0 ACEs. Youth diagnosed with comorbid ASD/ADHD had the lowest levels of family resilience. Interestingly, family resilience did not differ between ADHD and neurotypical youth.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nYouth diagnosed with ADHD seem to be at the highest risk for ACEs. Those with comorbid ASD/ADHD report the lowest levels of family resilience when controlling for exposure to ACEs. Families of youth with ASD had lower levels of family resilience than those of neurotypical youth when controlling for exposure to ACEs, whereas families of youth with solely ADHD displayed similar levels of family resilience in comparison to neurotypical youth and their families. Results have implications for prevention and intervention with ASD and/or ADHD youth and their families.","PeriodicalId":15655,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000703","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

OBJECTIVES The purpose of the present study was to (1) examine the differences in adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) among children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and comorbid ASD/ADHD and healthy neurodevelopmental controls; (2) explore the levels of family resilience across diagnostic categories; (3) identify the differences in family resilience by the number of ACEs; and (4) explore the interaction between ACEs and the diagnostic category on family resilience. METHOD Participants were 2083 children between the ages of 6 and 17 years (M = 12.23, SD = 3.36) from the 2016 National Survey of Children's Health. The majority of the sample were male (68.7%) and white (78.6%). RESULTS Overall, youth diagnosed with solely ADHD had the highest number of ACEs (Madj = 1.94). In addition, individuals who endorsed exposure to 1 ACE reported higher levels of family resilience in comparison to those who reported 0 ACEs or 2 or more ACEs. Family resilience did not differ between youth who experienced 2 or more ACEs and youth who experienced 0 ACEs. Youth diagnosed with comorbid ASD/ADHD had the lowest levels of family resilience. Interestingly, family resilience did not differ between ADHD and neurotypical youth. CONCLUSION Youth diagnosed with ADHD seem to be at the highest risk for ACEs. Those with comorbid ASD/ADHD report the lowest levels of family resilience when controlling for exposure to ACEs. Families of youth with ASD had lower levels of family resilience than those of neurotypical youth when controlling for exposure to ACEs, whereas families of youth with solely ADHD displayed similar levels of family resilience in comparison to neurotypical youth and their families. Results have implications for prevention and intervention with ASD and/or ADHD youth and their families.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自闭症谱系障碍和注意缺陷/多动障碍儿童的不良童年经历与家庭弹性。
目的本研究的目的是:(1)检查自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)、注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)和共病ASD/ADHD儿童与健康神经发育对照者在不良童年经历(ace)方面的差异;(2)探索不同诊断类别的家庭弹性水平;(3)通过不良经历的数量来识别家庭心理韧性的差异;(4)探讨ace与家庭心理韧性诊断类别的交互作用。方法选取2016年全国儿童健康调查中的2083名6 ~ 17岁儿童(M = 12.23, SD = 3.36)作为研究对象。大多数样本为男性(68.7%)和白人(78.6%)。结果总体而言,单纯诊断为ADHD的青少年的ace发生率最高(Madj = 1.94)。此外,与那些报告0或2或更多ACE的人相比,承认接触过1次ACE的人报告了更高的家庭弹性水平。家庭弹性在经历过2次或更多ace的青少年和没有经历过ace的青少年之间没有差异。被诊断为ASD/ADHD合并症的青少年的家庭适应力水平最低。有趣的是,家庭恢复力在多动症和神经正常的青少年之间没有差异。结论诊断为ADHD的青少年发生ace的风险最高。在控制ace暴露的情况下,患有ASD/ADHD合并症的家庭恢复能力水平最低。在控制ace暴露的情况下,患有ASD的青少年家庭的家庭弹性水平低于神经正常的青少年,而单纯患有ADHD的青少年家庭的家庭弹性水平与神经正常的青少年及其家庭相似。研究结果对ASD和/或ADHD青少年及其家庭的预防和干预具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Are There Bidirectional Influences Between Screen Time Exposure and Social Behavioral Traits in Young Children? Connectome Analysis in an Individual with SETD1B-Related Neurodevelopmental Disorder and Epilepsy Decision-Making in Childhood Predicts Prodromal Eating Pathology in Adolescence Children and Youth with Complex Cerebral Palsy: Care and Management. The Grandfamily Guidebook: Wisdom and Support for Grandparents Raising Grandchildren.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1