A Comparative Study of Support Vector Machine and Maximum Likelihood Classification to Extract Land Cover of Lahore District, Punjab, Pakistan

Fatima Mushtaq, K. Mahmood, Mohammad Chaudhry Hamid, Rahat Tufail
{"title":"A Comparative Study of Support Vector Machine and Maximum Likelihood Classification to Extract Land Cover of Lahore District, Punjab, Pakistan","authors":"Fatima Mushtaq, K. Mahmood, Mohammad Chaudhry Hamid, Rahat Tufail","doi":"10.52763/PJSIR.PHYS.SCI.64.3.2021.265.274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The advent of technological era, the scientists and researchers develop machine learning classification techniques to classify land cover accurately. Researches prove that these classification techniques perform better than previous traditional techniques. In this research main objective is to identify suitable land cover classification method to extract land cover information of Lahore district. Two supervised classification techniques i.e., Maximum Likelihood Classifier (MLC) (based on neighbourhood function) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) (based on optimal hyper-plane function) are compared by using Sentinel-2 data. For this optimization, four land cover classes have been selected. Field based training samples have been collected and prepared through a survey of the study area at four spatial levels. Accuracy for each of the classifier has been assessed using error matrix and kappa statistics. Results show that SVM performs better than MLC. Overall accuracies of SVM and MLC are 95.20% and 88.80% whereas their kappa co-efficient are 0.93 and 0.84 respectively.","PeriodicalId":19924,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research Series A: Physical Sciences","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research Series A: Physical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52763/PJSIR.PHYS.SCI.64.3.2021.265.274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The advent of technological era, the scientists and researchers develop machine learning classification techniques to classify land cover accurately. Researches prove that these classification techniques perform better than previous traditional techniques. In this research main objective is to identify suitable land cover classification method to extract land cover information of Lahore district. Two supervised classification techniques i.e., Maximum Likelihood Classifier (MLC) (based on neighbourhood function) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) (based on optimal hyper-plane function) are compared by using Sentinel-2 data. For this optimization, four land cover classes have been selected. Field based training samples have been collected and prepared through a survey of the study area at four spatial levels. Accuracy for each of the classifier has been assessed using error matrix and kappa statistics. Results show that SVM performs better than MLC. Overall accuracies of SVM and MLC are 95.20% and 88.80% whereas their kappa co-efficient are 0.93 and 0.84 respectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
支持向量机与最大似然分类在巴基斯坦旁遮普省拉合尔地区土地覆盖提取中的比较研究
随着科技时代的到来,科学家和研究人员开发了机器学习分类技术来对土地覆盖进行准确的分类。研究证明,这些分类技术比以往的传统分类技术具有更好的性能。本研究的主要目的是确定合适的土地覆盖分类方法来提取拉合尔地区的土地覆盖信息。利用Sentinel-2数据,比较了基于邻域函数的最大似然分类器(MLC)和基于最优超平面函数的支持向量机(SVM)两种监督分类技术。为了进行优化,我们选择了四个土地覆盖类别。通过对研究区四个空间层次的调查,收集和准备了基于实地的训练样本。使用误差矩阵和kappa统计对每个分类器的精度进行了评估。结果表明,SVM的性能优于MLC。SVM和MLC的总体准确率分别为95.20%和88.80%,kappa系数分别为0.93和0.84。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Durability Studies on High Strength Concrete Health Monitoring and Breathing Support System Water Quality Modeling Using Soil and Water Assessment Tool: A Case Study of Rawal Watershed Design and Analysis of Wave Energy Converter Technologies Analysis of Vulnerabilities in System by Penetration Testing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1