Pilot of a community-based interprofessional “student-infused” pulmonary rehabilitation program in Saint John, New Brunswick

J. Doucet, T. Fournier, C. Bishop, Derek J. Gaudet, Daniel A Nagel
{"title":"Pilot of a community-based interprofessional “student-infused” pulmonary rehabilitation program in Saint John, New Brunswick","authors":"J. Doucet, T. Fournier, C. Bishop, Derek J. Gaudet, Daniel A Nagel","doi":"10.29390/cjrt-2020-053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background With the increasing prevalence of chronic pulmonary conditions in New Brunswick and Canada it is necessary to consider innovative interventions to improve access to rehabilitation and supportive care for affected clients. In Fall 2018 we piloted a pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) program for persons with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to demonstrate a novel approach of bridging interprofessional education of students in health care fields with provision of care in a community setting. Methods An 8-week PR program was implemented and evaluated using a quasi-experimental design with pre- and post-testing to measure the effects of the program’s exercise and educational interventions on persons with COPD. Participants were assessed using the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and a custom questionnaire that rated the participants’ activities of daily living and the PR program. Results Seven participants completed our PR program. Following the intervention, participants’ self-reported health demonstrated a statistically significant improvement. Even though changes on the 6MWT and SGRQ were not shown to be statistically significant, there was evidence of clinically meaningful improvements in those measures. On average, participants walked 25 m further postintervention and showed clinically meaningful improvements on the SGRQ. Conclusions This pilot project demonstrated that a community-based PR program with active involvement of students from multiple health care programs can have positive outcomes for clients with COPD. It also illustrated how educational programs can provide an innovative means for increasing access to rehabilitation and supportive care for clients in the community.","PeriodicalId":9533,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy: CJRT = Revue Canadienne de la Thérapie Respiratoire : RCTR","volume":"52 1","pages":"26 - 31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy: CJRT = Revue Canadienne de la Thérapie Respiratoire : RCTR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29390/cjrt-2020-053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background With the increasing prevalence of chronic pulmonary conditions in New Brunswick and Canada it is necessary to consider innovative interventions to improve access to rehabilitation and supportive care for affected clients. In Fall 2018 we piloted a pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) program for persons with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to demonstrate a novel approach of bridging interprofessional education of students in health care fields with provision of care in a community setting. Methods An 8-week PR program was implemented and evaluated using a quasi-experimental design with pre- and post-testing to measure the effects of the program’s exercise and educational interventions on persons with COPD. Participants were assessed using the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and a custom questionnaire that rated the participants’ activities of daily living and the PR program. Results Seven participants completed our PR program. Following the intervention, participants’ self-reported health demonstrated a statistically significant improvement. Even though changes on the 6MWT and SGRQ were not shown to be statistically significant, there was evidence of clinically meaningful improvements in those measures. On average, participants walked 25 m further postintervention and showed clinically meaningful improvements on the SGRQ. Conclusions This pilot project demonstrated that a community-based PR program with active involvement of students from multiple health care programs can have positive outcomes for clients with COPD. It also illustrated how educational programs can provide an innovative means for increasing access to rehabilitation and supportive care for clients in the community.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在新不伦瑞克省圣约翰试点一个以社区为基础的跨专业“学生参与”肺部康复方案
背景:随着慢性肺部疾病在新不伦瑞克省和加拿大的日益流行,有必要考虑创新的干预措施,以改善患者获得康复和支持性护理的机会。2018年秋季,我们试点了一项针对中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的肺康复(PR)计划,以展示一种将医疗保健领域学生的跨专业教育与社区环境中提供护理联系起来的新方法。方法实施一项为期8周的PR计划,并采用准实验设计进行评估,包括前后测试,以衡量该计划的运动和教育干预对COPD患者的影响。参与者通过6分钟步行测试(6MWT)、圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)和一份评估参与者日常生活活动和公关计划的定制问卷进行评估。结果7名参与者完成了我们的公关计划。干预后,参与者自我报告的健康状况在统计上有显著改善。尽管6MWT和SGRQ的变化没有统计学意义,但有证据表明这些指标有临床意义的改善。参与者在干预后平均多走了25米,并在SGRQ上显示出有临床意义的改善。该试点项目表明,由来自多个医疗保健项目的学生积极参与的社区公关项目可以为COPD患者带来积极的结果。它还说明了教育项目如何能够提供一种创新的手段,以增加社区客户获得康复和支持性护理的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A cross-sectional survey on the effects of ambient temperature and humidity on health outcomes in individuals with chronic respiratory disease Impact of telephone follow-up on COPD outcomes in pulmonary rehabilitation patients: A randomized clinical trial A survey on the attitudinal differences between acute and community settings Strategies to achieve adherence to prone positioning in awake COVID-19 patients with high-flow nasal oxygen. A case series Winning Posters from the Canadian Society of Respiratory Therapists 2022 Annual Conference
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1