Patarenes, Protestants and Islam in Bosnia: Deconstructing the Bogomil Theory

IF 0.4 2区 哲学 N/A RELIGION Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations Pub Date : 2022-07-03 DOI:10.1080/09596410.2022.2121494
Ines Aščerić-Todd
{"title":"Patarenes, Protestants and Islam in Bosnia: Deconstructing the Bogomil Theory","authors":"Ines Aščerić-Todd","doi":"10.1080/09596410.2022.2121494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Attempts to explain the existence of a large indigenous Muslim population in Bosnia have resulted in two main academic trends, both subject to politicized and biased representations of the area’s history. The first, originating mostly in Serbian nationalist historiography, claims that Bosnian Christians were forcibly converted and has been used since the nineteenth century to galvanize support for Serbian expansionist ambitions in the shape of its ‘Greater Serbia’ project. The second and long the most popular view holds that the majority of Bosnian Christians who converted to Islam belonged to a heretical ‘Bogomil’ institution of the Bosnian Church. Although this theory has been questioned over time, one of its central premises – that there are similarities between the theology and practice of Bogomilism and those of Islam – has never undergone any scrutiny. This article examines both this crucial premise of the Bogomil Theory, and the theory’s provenance, and argues that, just as we should dismiss the Serbian (and Croatian) nationalist theories on the subject, we should also recognize the Bogomil Theory as a mythicized account of history, motived by both the personal prejudice and imperialist-colonialist agendas of its nineteenth-century authors.","PeriodicalId":45172,"journal":{"name":"Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2022.2121494","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Attempts to explain the existence of a large indigenous Muslim population in Bosnia have resulted in two main academic trends, both subject to politicized and biased representations of the area’s history. The first, originating mostly in Serbian nationalist historiography, claims that Bosnian Christians were forcibly converted and has been used since the nineteenth century to galvanize support for Serbian expansionist ambitions in the shape of its ‘Greater Serbia’ project. The second and long the most popular view holds that the majority of Bosnian Christians who converted to Islam belonged to a heretical ‘Bogomil’ institution of the Bosnian Church. Although this theory has been questioned over time, one of its central premises – that there are similarities between the theology and practice of Bogomilism and those of Islam – has never undergone any scrutiny. This article examines both this crucial premise of the Bogomil Theory, and the theory’s provenance, and argues that, just as we should dismiss the Serbian (and Croatian) nationalist theories on the subject, we should also recognize the Bogomil Theory as a mythicized account of history, motived by both the personal prejudice and imperialist-colonialist agendas of its nineteenth-century authors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
波士尼亚的Patarenes、新教徒与伊斯兰教:解构波格米尔理论
试图解释波斯尼亚大量土著穆斯林人口的存在导致了两种主要的学术趋势,这两种趋势都受到该地区历史政治化和偏见的影响。第一种,主要源于塞尔维亚民族主义史学,声称波斯尼亚的基督徒是被强迫皈依的,并且自19世纪以来一直被用来激发对塞尔维亚扩张主义野心的支持,以其“大塞尔维亚”计划的形式。第二种也是长期以来最流行的观点认为,大多数皈依伊斯兰教的波斯尼亚基督徒属于波斯尼亚教会的异端“Bogomil”机构。尽管这一理论一直受到质疑,但其核心前提之一——博格米尔主义的神学和实践与伊斯兰教的相似之处——从未经过任何审查。本文考察了Bogomil理论的这一关键前提,以及该理论的起源,并认为,正如我们应该摒弃塞尔维亚(和克罗地亚)民族主义关于这一主题的理论一样,我们也应该认识到Bogomil理论是一种神话化的历史描述,其动机是19世纪作者的个人偏见和帝国主义-殖民主义议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations (ICMR) provides a forum for the academic exploration and discussion of the religious tradition of Islam, and of relations between Islam and other religions. It is edited by members of the Department of Theology and Religion, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom. The editors welcome articles on all aspects of Islam, and particularly on: •the religion and culture of Islam, historical and contemporary •Islam and its relations with other faiths and ideologies •Christian-Muslim relations. Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations is a refereed, academic journal. It publishes articles, documentation and reviews.
期刊最新文献
The Prophet Muḥammad between Lived Religion and Elite Discourse: Rethinking and Decolonizing Christian Assessments of the uswa ḥasana through Comparative Theological Aesthetics Islamic Headscarves: The Other-Religion Effect and Religious Literacy at the European Court of Human Rights The Fatimids 2: The Rule from Egypt and Shiʿite Rulers, Sunni Rivals, and Christians in Between: Muslim–Christian Relations in Fāṭimid Palestine and Egypt The Fatimids 2: The Rule from Egypt , by Shainool Jiwa[World of Islam], London, I.B. Tauris in association with the Institute of Ismaili Studies, 2023, vi + 238 pp., £9.99 (paperback), ISBN 9780755646753 Shiʿite Rulers, Sunni Rivals, and Christians in Between: Muslim–Christian Relations in Fāṭimid Palestine and Egypt , by Steven… The Concept of Soul in Judaism, Christianity and Islam The Concept of Soul in Judaism, Christianity and Islam , edited by Christoph Böttingheimer and Wenzel Maximilian Widenka [Key Concepts in Interreligious Discourses 11], Berlin, De Gruyter, 2023, vii+132 pp., €24.95 (paperback), ISBN 978 3 11 074818 5 The Genoese Predicament: Christian–Muslim Communication in the Annales Ianuenses ( c. 1099–1293)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1