A Comparison of the Effect of Ondansetron and Propofol on Intrathecal Opioid-Induced itch in Elective Cesarean Section

A. Mahouri, S. Sane, E. Hassani, H. Rezaie, L. Aghasi
{"title":"A Comparison of the Effect of Ondansetron and Propofol on Intrathecal Opioid-Induced itch in Elective Cesarean Section","authors":"A. Mahouri, S. Sane, E. Hassani, H. Rezaie, L. Aghasi","doi":"10.18869/ACADPUB.JBUMS.20.2.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"J Babol Univ Med Sci; 20(2); Feb 2018; PP: 7-12 Received: Jun 12 2017, Revised: Sep 23 2017, Accepted: Dec 2 2017. ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Itch is one of the most common and uncomfortable side effects of neuraxial anesthesia. Its incidence is higher especially in cesarean section. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of ondansetron and propofol at doses lower than the hypnotic dose on the treatment of itch induced by intrathecal fentanyl in cesarean section. METHODS: In this prospective study, 90 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I and class II with an average age of 30 years and first time cesarean section underwent intra-spinal anesthesia with 25 μg fentanyl and 10 mg bupivacaine 0.5%. Women were randomly divided into two groups of 45. One group received 4 mg ondansetron and another group received 10 mg propofol at first and then 10 μg/kg / min through infusion. The incidence and severity of itch were recorded on the basis of the visual scoring system during operation and during recovery. FINDINGS:The highest incidence of itch was 30 to 60 minutes after injection. The incidence of itch during surgery was 2.22% and 7.26%, and during recovery was 7.6% and 8.8%, in the ondansetron and propofol groups, respectively (p=0.5, p=0.4). The mean itch severity scores during surgery were 1.85±0.69 and 1.66±0.81, and during the recovery were 1.33±0.57 and 1.25±0.5, in the ondansetron and propofol groups, respectively (p=0.65) (p=0.84). CONCLUSION: Based on the results of this study, ondansetron and propofol at doses lower than the hypnotic dose were well tolerated. Considering the effect of both drugs on the treatment of itch caused by intrathecal fentanyl, both of them can be used clinically.","PeriodicalId":15108,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Babol University of Medical Sciences","volume":"101 1","pages":"7-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Babol University of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18869/ACADPUB.JBUMS.20.2.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

J Babol Univ Med Sci; 20(2); Feb 2018; PP: 7-12 Received: Jun 12 2017, Revised: Sep 23 2017, Accepted: Dec 2 2017. ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Itch is one of the most common and uncomfortable side effects of neuraxial anesthesia. Its incidence is higher especially in cesarean section. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of ondansetron and propofol at doses lower than the hypnotic dose on the treatment of itch induced by intrathecal fentanyl in cesarean section. METHODS: In this prospective study, 90 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I and class II with an average age of 30 years and first time cesarean section underwent intra-spinal anesthesia with 25 μg fentanyl and 10 mg bupivacaine 0.5%. Women were randomly divided into two groups of 45. One group received 4 mg ondansetron and another group received 10 mg propofol at first and then 10 μg/kg / min through infusion. The incidence and severity of itch were recorded on the basis of the visual scoring system during operation and during recovery. FINDINGS:The highest incidence of itch was 30 to 60 minutes after injection. The incidence of itch during surgery was 2.22% and 7.26%, and during recovery was 7.6% and 8.8%, in the ondansetron and propofol groups, respectively (p=0.5, p=0.4). The mean itch severity scores during surgery were 1.85±0.69 and 1.66±0.81, and during the recovery were 1.33±0.57 and 1.25±0.5, in the ondansetron and propofol groups, respectively (p=0.65) (p=0.84). CONCLUSION: Based on the results of this study, ondansetron and propofol at doses lower than the hypnotic dose were well tolerated. Considering the effect of both drugs on the treatment of itch caused by intrathecal fentanyl, both of them can be used clinically.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
昂丹司琼与异丙酚对选择性剖宫产术鞘内阿片瘙痒的影响比较
巴宝勒大学医学杂志;20 (2);2018年2月;收稿日期:2017年6月12日,修稿日期:2017年9月23日,收稿日期:2017年12月2日。背景与目的:瘙痒是神经轴麻最常见和最不舒服的副作用之一。其发病率较高,尤其是剖宫产。本研究的目的是比较低于催眠剂量的昂丹司琼和异丙酚对剖宫产术中芬太尼鞘内致痒的治疗效果。方法:在本前瞻性研究中,90例平均年龄30岁的美国麻醉学会(ASA) I类和II类首次剖宫产患者行芬太尼25 μg + 0.5%布比卡因10 mg脊髓内麻醉。女性被随机分为两组,每组45人。一组患者先给予昂丹西琼4 mg,另一组患者先给予异丙酚10 mg,后经静脉滴注10 μg/kg / min。根据视觉评分系统记录手术期间和恢复期间瘙痒的发生率和严重程度。发现:注射后30 ~ 60分钟瘙痒发生率最高。昂丹司琼组和异丙酚组术中瘙痒发生率分别为2.22%和7.26%,恢复期间瘙痒发生率分别为7.6%和8.8% (p=0.5, p=0.4)。昂丹司琼组和异丙酚组手术时瘙痒严重程度平均评分分别为1.85±0.69和1.66±0.81,恢复时瘙痒严重程度平均评分分别为1.33±0.57和1.25±0.5 (p=0.65) (p=0.84)。结论:根据本研究结果,低于催眠剂量的昂丹司琼和异丙酚耐受性良好。考虑到两种药物治疗鞘内芬太尼引起的瘙痒的效果,两种药物均可在临床上使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
نقش پیشگویی کننده لکوسیتوز، آنمی و ترومبوسیتوز قبل از جراحی با شدت تومورهای اپیتلیالی تخمدان ژن های عامل بیماری ادرار شربت افرا ، پاتو مکانیسم مولکولی بیماری و جهش های جمعیت ایران Nurses’ Experience of Pain Management in Patients Referred to the Emergency Department A Case Report of Mucopolysaccharidosis Type VI Maternal Exposure to Air Pollution and Fetal Abnormalities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1