The Rational-Empiric Model of the Functional Intellect and the Structural Brain

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY Philosophia-International Journal of Philosophy Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.11648/j.ijp.20221001.14
M. Mushfequr Rahman
{"title":"The Rational-Empiric Model of the Functional Intellect and the Structural Brain","authors":"M. Mushfequr Rahman","doi":"10.11648/j.ijp.20221001.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The traditional conflict in epistemology has been between rationalism and empiricism. Philosophers have often tried to align themselves in one of these schools even though a close reading of some of their writings may suggest they may often have used both varyingly, one more than the other. This paper demonstrates that both rationalism and empiricism work together and are thus called the rational-empiric model. The paper extends the scope of the rational-empiric model to also evolving cognitive developments and other aspects of reasoning such as computational thought and makes an effort towards summarizing the nature of human reason by explaining the functional intellect and the structural brain since the time of Aristotle to date drawing from theology, philosophy, logic, computer science, and psychology. The paper presents the rationalempiric model in a broader in-depth context with supporting ideas and evidence. Various literature on theology, logic, philosophy, and psychology has been used to elaborate on the concepts. The paper concludes that the purpose of the rational empiric model is to discover knowledge by finding and understanding ontologies as they exist and function or as they ought to exist and function.","PeriodicalId":40692,"journal":{"name":"Philosophia-International Journal of Philosophy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophia-International Journal of Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20221001.14","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The traditional conflict in epistemology has been between rationalism and empiricism. Philosophers have often tried to align themselves in one of these schools even though a close reading of some of their writings may suggest they may often have used both varyingly, one more than the other. This paper demonstrates that both rationalism and empiricism work together and are thus called the rational-empiric model. The paper extends the scope of the rational-empiric model to also evolving cognitive developments and other aspects of reasoning such as computational thought and makes an effort towards summarizing the nature of human reason by explaining the functional intellect and the structural brain since the time of Aristotle to date drawing from theology, philosophy, logic, computer science, and psychology. The paper presents the rationalempiric model in a broader in-depth context with supporting ideas and evidence. Various literature on theology, logic, philosophy, and psychology has been used to elaborate on the concepts. The paper concludes that the purpose of the rational empiric model is to discover knowledge by finding and understanding ontologies as they exist and function or as they ought to exist and function.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
功能性智力的理性-经验模型与结构脑
传统的认识论冲突一直是理性主义与经验主义之间的冲突。哲学家们经常试图将自己与这些学派中的一个联系起来,尽管仔细阅读他们的一些作品可能会发现他们可能经常不同地使用这两种学派,其中一种多于另一种。本文论证了理性主义和经验主义是一起工作的,因此被称为理性-经验模式。本文将理性-经验模型的范围扩展到不断发展的认知发展和推理的其他方面,如计算思维,并从神学、哲学、逻辑学、计算机科学和心理学的角度出发,通过解释自亚里士多德时代以来的功能性智力和大脑结构,努力总结人类理性的本质。本文在更广泛的深入背景下提出了理性经验模型,并提供了支持思想和证据。神学、逻辑学、哲学和心理学的各种文献都被用来阐述这些概念。本文的结论是,理性经验模型的目的是通过发现和理解本体的存在和功能或应该存在和功能来发现知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
Discounting Utility Without Complaints: Avoiding the Demandingness of Classical Utilitarianism The Assemble of Olympism and Nationalism: Social Philosophical Analysis of Beijing 2022 Winter Olympic Games as Case Study Distinguishing Models of Kierkegaard’s Indirect Communication: Toward a Clearer View of a Multivalent Discourse Technique Ubuntu as an Ethical Framework in Business Ethics for African Socio-Economic Development Spinoza: Desire and Supreme Good, from Philosophizing to Wise
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1