Comparative study between medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy using modified step plate and arthroereisis for management of planovalgus feet

Mostafa A Badawy, Ahmed M Kholeif, Y. Radwan, Ahmed M EL Sersawy
{"title":"Comparative study between medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy using modified step plate and arthroereisis for management of planovalgus feet","authors":"Mostafa A Badawy, Ahmed M Kholeif, Y. Radwan, Ahmed M EL Sersawy","doi":"10.1177/22104917221136283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Flexible flatfoot is a common condition that is characterized by hindfoot valgus with longitudinal medial-arch collapse. Many strategies for treatment have been reported but according to the current literature, controversy remains. Objectives: To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of medializing calcaneal osteotomy utilizing modified step plate and subtalar arthroereisis utilizing conical subtalar implant for patients with symptomatic flexible pes planus. Methods: A prospective, randomized, double center study was conducted between May 2017 and May 2019 at the Foot and Ankle Department of Cairo University Hospital and El Sahel Teaching Hospital on 26 patients (37 feet) with flexible flat feet to compare between medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy using modified locked step plate (group A) compromising 17 feet and arthroereisis using subtalar implant (group B) compromising 20 feet. Results: By the end period of the study, 25 males and 12 females were available for our analysis of results with a mean follow-up period of 10.14 months (range 7–14 months), clinical scoring (American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score, Foot Functional Index) with radiological analysis revealed a non-significant difference between both groups, the overall complication rate was 16.2%. Conclusion: Both medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy and subtalar arthroereisis significantly improved radiographic and subjective clinical outcome measures in the surgical treatment of painful flexible planovalgus feet. The less-invasive nature and lower potential morbidity suggest that judicious use of arthroereisis implants is an appropriate alternative.","PeriodicalId":42408,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics Trauma and Rehabilitation","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedics Trauma and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22104917221136283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Flexible flatfoot is a common condition that is characterized by hindfoot valgus with longitudinal medial-arch collapse. Many strategies for treatment have been reported but according to the current literature, controversy remains. Objectives: To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of medializing calcaneal osteotomy utilizing modified step plate and subtalar arthroereisis utilizing conical subtalar implant for patients with symptomatic flexible pes planus. Methods: A prospective, randomized, double center study was conducted between May 2017 and May 2019 at the Foot and Ankle Department of Cairo University Hospital and El Sahel Teaching Hospital on 26 patients (37 feet) with flexible flat feet to compare between medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy using modified locked step plate (group A) compromising 17 feet and arthroereisis using subtalar implant (group B) compromising 20 feet. Results: By the end period of the study, 25 males and 12 females were available for our analysis of results with a mean follow-up period of 10.14 months (range 7–14 months), clinical scoring (American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score, Foot Functional Index) with radiological analysis revealed a non-significant difference between both groups, the overall complication rate was 16.2%. Conclusion: Both medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy and subtalar arthroereisis significantly improved radiographic and subjective clinical outcome measures in the surgical treatment of painful flexible planovalgus feet. The less-invasive nature and lower potential morbidity suggest that judicious use of arthroereisis implants is an appropriate alternative.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改良踏步钢板内侧移位跟骨截骨术与关节固定术治疗足跖外翻的比较研究
背景:柔性扁平足是一种常见的疾病,其特征是后足外翻并纵向中足弓塌陷。许多治疗策略已被报道,但根据目前的文献,争议仍然存在。目的:比较改良台阶钢板内侧截骨与锥形距下关节固定术治疗有症状的柔性扁平足的临床和影像学结果。方法:2017年5月至2019年5月,在开罗大学医院足踝部和El Sahel教学医院对26例(37英尺)柔性平足患者进行了一项前瞻性、随机、双中心研究,比较使用改良锁定踏板钢板(A组)进行内侧移位跟骨截骨术(17英尺)和使用距下植入物(B组)进行关节固定术(20英尺)。结果:研究结束时,男性25例,女性12例,平均随访10.14个月(范围7-14个月),临床评分(美国骨科足踝学会评分,足功能指数)和影像学分析显示两组间无显著差异,总并发症发生率为16.2%。结论:内侧移位式跟骨截骨术和距下关节融合术均能显著改善手术治疗疼痛性挠性平外翻足的影像学和主观临床效果。较小的侵入性和较低的潜在发病率表明,明智地使用关节复位植入物是一种合适的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ultrasonic measurement for the diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome: A study in the Hong Kong Chinese population The surgical outcome of postoperative radial neck nonunion: Retrospective case series with systematic review Tip-to-apex distance does not predict fixation failure regardless of reduction quality in intra-capsular neck of femur fractures treated with femoral neck system Real world patient-reported and health care professional-perceived pain severity in outpatient fracture clinic procedures Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on sports and arthroscopic surgery in local hospitals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1