Retail Inventory, Consumer Stockpiling, and Environmental Stress: Empirical Evidence From a Natural Experiment

X. Pan, B. Mantin, M. Dresner
{"title":"Retail Inventory, Consumer Stockpiling, and Environmental Stress: Empirical Evidence From a Natural Experiment","authors":"X. Pan, B. Mantin, M. Dresner","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3308690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During economic downturns, consumers change their buying patterns, resulting in suboptimal retail fulfillment performance in the absence of adjustments to these changes by retailers. This paper shows how household stockpiling patterns evolved during the “Great Recession” of 2008-2009, and demonstrates the impact of this change on inventory management at a retail chain that pursues a high-low pricing strategy. In the face of increasing environmental stress due to financial and economic events, consumers are likely to spend more time at home and shop more frugally. At the same time, in a high-low (promotional) environment, consumers may be incentivized to increase the amount they stockpile to take advantage of promotional prices. Accordingly, we use the two-segment household inventory theory to categorize consumers in a retail channel into non-stockpiling and stockpiling segments. Drawing on a combination of household-level and retailer-level analysis and using the 2008–2009 financial crisis as a natural experiment, we find that as environmental stress increases, consumers, in general, decrease their consumption rates. However, they also increase the time between shopping trips, thus hold inventories for a longer period of time. Finally, the relative size of the stockpiling segment to the non-stockpilers is reduced, perhaps due to budget constraints on a larger percent of the population. These changes in consumer stockpiling behavior add complexity to retail inventory planning. In particular, lower consumer demand does not imply lower inventory risk during times of economic downturns. In order to efficiently meet consumer needs, retailers need to carefully adjust inventory and safety stock levels (both of which, as we find, may actually need to increase or decrease during promotional periods), due to the compound variability in consumption rate, inventory holding duration, and size of the stockpiling segment.","PeriodicalId":10477,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Social Science eJournal","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Social Science eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3308690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

During economic downturns, consumers change their buying patterns, resulting in suboptimal retail fulfillment performance in the absence of adjustments to these changes by retailers. This paper shows how household stockpiling patterns evolved during the “Great Recession” of 2008-2009, and demonstrates the impact of this change on inventory management at a retail chain that pursues a high-low pricing strategy. In the face of increasing environmental stress due to financial and economic events, consumers are likely to spend more time at home and shop more frugally. At the same time, in a high-low (promotional) environment, consumers may be incentivized to increase the amount they stockpile to take advantage of promotional prices. Accordingly, we use the two-segment household inventory theory to categorize consumers in a retail channel into non-stockpiling and stockpiling segments. Drawing on a combination of household-level and retailer-level analysis and using the 2008–2009 financial crisis as a natural experiment, we find that as environmental stress increases, consumers, in general, decrease their consumption rates. However, they also increase the time between shopping trips, thus hold inventories for a longer period of time. Finally, the relative size of the stockpiling segment to the non-stockpilers is reduced, perhaps due to budget constraints on a larger percent of the population. These changes in consumer stockpiling behavior add complexity to retail inventory planning. In particular, lower consumer demand does not imply lower inventory risk during times of economic downturns. In order to efficiently meet consumer needs, retailers need to carefully adjust inventory and safety stock levels (both of which, as we find, may actually need to increase or decrease during promotional periods), due to the compound variability in consumption rate, inventory holding duration, and size of the stockpiling segment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
零售库存、消费者库存和环境压力:来自自然实验的经验证据
在经济衰退期间,消费者改变了他们的购买模式,导致零售商在没有对这些变化进行调整的情况下,零售履行绩效不佳。本文展示了2008-2009年“大衰退”期间家庭库存模式的演变,并展示了这种变化对追求高-低定价策略的零售连锁店库存管理的影响。面对金融和经济事件造成的日益严重的环境压力,消费者可能会花更多的时间在家里,更节俭地购物。同时,在高-低(促销)环境中,消费者可能会被激励增加他们的库存数量,以利用促销价格。因此,我们使用两段家庭库存理论将零售渠道中的消费者分为非库存和库存两部分。结合家庭层面和零售商层面的分析,并将2008-2009年的金融危机作为自然实验,我们发现,随着环境压力的增加,消费者总体上降低了消费率。然而,它们也增加了两次购物之间的时间间隔,从而延长了库存的时间。最后,储存部门相对于非储存部门的规模减少了,这可能是由于对人口中较大比例的人的预算限制。消费者储存行为的这些变化增加了零售库存计划的复杂性。特别是,在经济低迷时期,较低的消费需求并不意味着较低的库存风险。为了有效地满足消费者的需求,零售商需要仔细调整库存和安全库存水平(正如我们所发现的,这两者实际上可能需要在促销期间增加或减少),因为消费率、库存持有时间和库存部分的规模存在复合变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Cost of Overconfidence in Public Information The Compliance Consequences of Fault Assignment in Sanctions Examining the Link Between Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Work Performance of Employees in the Private Schools, Mediated by Workplace Environment An Ordinal Theory of Risk and Correlation Aversion Persuasion Under Costly Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1