Dr. Bhumi K Maru, Dr. Anupama Kisku, Dipika P. Patel, Dr. Tejendra Arya, Dr. Jayshree M Thakkar
{"title":"Evaluate the efficacy of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl-midazolam combination on awake fiberoptic intubation in oral cancer surgery","authors":"Dr. Bhumi K Maru, Dr. Anupama Kisku, Dipika P. Patel, Dr. Tejendra Arya, Dr. Jayshree M Thakkar","doi":"10.33545/26648849.2023.v5.i1a.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Awake beroptic intubation (AFOI) is the principal techniques in the management of difcult airway in\noral cancer surgery. The aim of study was to evaluate the efcacy of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl-midazolam\ncombination on awake beroptic intubation in oral cancer surgery. An ideal sedation regimen would ensure patient's comfort and co-ordination\nattenuation of airway reexes, hemodynamic stability and sedation. 60 patients Methods: of age group 18-60 years with American Society of\nAnaesthesiologist I and II posted for oral cancer surgery under general anaesthesia were randomly divided into two groups of 30 each in this\nprospective randomised and comparative study. Group-D (30 pt): Received an infusion of 1 µg /kg in 100ml Normal saline infusion IV over 10\nmin. Group-FM (30 pt): Received an infusion of fentanyl 2 µg /kg and midazolam 0.02mg/kg IV in 10ml of normal saline. All Patients were\nassessed for vocal cord movement, coughing, physical movement, comfort score, Ramsay sedation score, patient satisfaction score, and\nintubation time and hemodynamics variables. The demographic characteristics w Results: ere comparable in two groups (P>0.05).Group-D has\nmore incidence of vocal cord opening than Group-FM. Group-D has less cough score than group-FM. Limb movement scores were more in\ngroup-FM than group-D. Group-D were more satised than group-FM (P=0.0002). RSS Score was signicantly better in Group-D than in\nGroup-FM (P=0.041). Group-D showed signicantly reduced hemodynamic response to AFOI than group-FM. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine\nis more effective than fentanyl-midazolam during AFOI, as it provides better intubation condition, hemodynamics stability and sedation","PeriodicalId":91883,"journal":{"name":"International journal of anesthesiology & research","volume":"81 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of anesthesiology & research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33545/26648849.2023.v5.i1a.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Awake beroptic intubation (AFOI) is the principal techniques in the management of difcult airway in
oral cancer surgery. The aim of study was to evaluate the efcacy of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl-midazolam
combination on awake beroptic intubation in oral cancer surgery. An ideal sedation regimen would ensure patient's comfort and co-ordination
attenuation of airway reexes, hemodynamic stability and sedation. 60 patients Methods: of age group 18-60 years with American Society of
Anaesthesiologist I and II posted for oral cancer surgery under general anaesthesia were randomly divided into two groups of 30 each in this
prospective randomised and comparative study. Group-D (30 pt): Received an infusion of 1 µg /kg in 100ml Normal saline infusion IV over 10
min. Group-FM (30 pt): Received an infusion of fentanyl 2 µg /kg and midazolam 0.02mg/kg IV in 10ml of normal saline. All Patients were
assessed for vocal cord movement, coughing, physical movement, comfort score, Ramsay sedation score, patient satisfaction score, and
intubation time and hemodynamics variables. The demographic characteristics w Results: ere comparable in two groups (P>0.05).Group-D has
more incidence of vocal cord opening than Group-FM. Group-D has less cough score than group-FM. Limb movement scores were more in
group-FM than group-D. Group-D were more satised than group-FM (P=0.0002). RSS Score was signicantly better in Group-D than in
Group-FM (P=0.041). Group-D showed signicantly reduced hemodynamic response to AFOI than group-FM. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine
is more effective than fentanyl-midazolam during AFOI, as it provides better intubation condition, hemodynamics stability and sedation