Breastfeeding Behaviors and Maternal Interaction Quality in a Low-Income, Ethnic Minority Population.

M. Whipps, Elizabeth B. Miller, D. Bogen, A. Mendelsohn, Pamela A. Morris, D. Shaw, R. Gross
{"title":"Breastfeeding Behaviors and Maternal Interaction Quality in a Low-Income, Ethnic Minority Population.","authors":"M. Whipps, Elizabeth B. Miller, D. Bogen, A. Mendelsohn, Pamela A. Morris, D. Shaw, R. Gross","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000000743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo examine the associations between breastfeeding intensity and underexplored features of maternal-child interaction quality over and above the influence of breastfeeding initiation.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThe current study leveraged an on-going, multisite randomized controlled trial of a tiered parenting program for 462 Medicaid-eligible mothers and their infants in the United States. We examined whether breastfeeding intensity and exclusivity was associated with observed maternal sensitivity, intrusiveness, and detachment, as well as self-reported maternal verbal responsiveness, 6 months infant age. Analyses controlled for breastfeeding initiation, demographics, and early parenting experiences.\n\n\nRESULTS\nHigher intensity breastfeeding at 6 months was significantly related to higher maternal sensitivity (β = 0.12, p = 0.004) and lower maternal intrusiveness (β = -0.10, p = 0.045). There was no significant association between breastfeeding intensity at 6 months and detachment (β = -0.02, no significant [ns]) or self-reported verbal responsiveness (β = 0.11, ns). Results were the same when intensity was measured as a dichotomous indicator for exclusive breastfeeding. Effect sizes were small-to-moderate, ranging from Cohen's d = 0.26 to 0.31. Associations did not vary by site, race/ethnicity, infant difficultness, or household poverty.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe finding that breastfeeding intensity was significantly and independently associated with maternal sensitivity and intrusiveness is novel in the literature on low-income families from the United States. These findings have implications for breastfeeding promotion strategies and indicate that future research should explore synergistic or spillover effects of interventions aimed at maternal-child interaction quality into the infant feeding domain, particularly in the primary care setting.","PeriodicalId":15655,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To examine the associations between breastfeeding intensity and underexplored features of maternal-child interaction quality over and above the influence of breastfeeding initiation. METHODS The current study leveraged an on-going, multisite randomized controlled trial of a tiered parenting program for 462 Medicaid-eligible mothers and their infants in the United States. We examined whether breastfeeding intensity and exclusivity was associated with observed maternal sensitivity, intrusiveness, and detachment, as well as self-reported maternal verbal responsiveness, 6 months infant age. Analyses controlled for breastfeeding initiation, demographics, and early parenting experiences. RESULTS Higher intensity breastfeeding at 6 months was significantly related to higher maternal sensitivity (β = 0.12, p = 0.004) and lower maternal intrusiveness (β = -0.10, p = 0.045). There was no significant association between breastfeeding intensity at 6 months and detachment (β = -0.02, no significant [ns]) or self-reported verbal responsiveness (β = 0.11, ns). Results were the same when intensity was measured as a dichotomous indicator for exclusive breastfeeding. Effect sizes were small-to-moderate, ranging from Cohen's d = 0.26 to 0.31. Associations did not vary by site, race/ethnicity, infant difficultness, or household poverty. CONCLUSION The finding that breastfeeding intensity was significantly and independently associated with maternal sensitivity and intrusiveness is novel in the literature on low-income families from the United States. These findings have implications for breastfeeding promotion strategies and indicate that future research should explore synergistic or spillover effects of interventions aimed at maternal-child interaction quality into the infant feeding domain, particularly in the primary care setting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低收入少数民族人群的母乳喂养行为与母亲互动质量
目的探讨母乳喂养强度与未被充分发掘的母婴互动质量特征之间的关系,以及母乳喂养开始的影响。方法:目前的研究利用了一项正在进行的、多地点的随机对照试验,该试验对美国462名符合医疗补助条件的母亲及其婴儿进行了分层育儿计划。我们研究了母乳喂养强度和排他性是否与观察到的母亲敏感性、侵入性和超然性以及自我报告的母亲言语反应有关。分析控制了母乳喂养开始、人口统计学和早期养育经历。结果6月龄时母乳喂养强度越高,产妇敏感性越高(β = 0.12, p = 0.004),产妇侵入性越低(β = -0.10, p = 0.045)。6个月时母乳喂养强度与脱离(β = -0.02,无显著[ns])或自我报告的言语反应(β = 0.11, ns)之间无显著关联。当强度作为纯母乳喂养的二分类指标进行测量时,结果是相同的。效应大小从小到中等,科恩的d = 0.26至0.31。关联不因地点、种族/民族、婴儿困难或家庭贫困而异。结论在美国低收入家庭中,母乳喂养强度与母亲的敏感性和侵入性存在显著且独立的相关性,这一发现在文献中是新颖的。这些发现对母乳喂养促进策略具有启示意义,并表明未来的研究应探索旨在提高母婴互动质量的干预措施在婴儿喂养领域的协同效应或溢出效应,特别是在初级保健环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Are There Bidirectional Influences Between Screen Time Exposure and Social Behavioral Traits in Young Children? Connectome Analysis in an Individual with SETD1B-Related Neurodevelopmental Disorder and Epilepsy Decision-Making in Childhood Predicts Prodromal Eating Pathology in Adolescence Children and Youth with Complex Cerebral Palsy: Care and Management. The Grandfamily Guidebook: Wisdom and Support for Grandparents Raising Grandchildren.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1