Talmy’s typology in serializing languages: Variations on a VP

IF 0.9 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Glossa-A Journal of General Linguistics Pub Date : 2022-05-08 DOI:10.16995/glossa.7686
Jens Hopperdietzel
{"title":"Talmy’s typology in serializing languages: Variations on a VP","authors":"Jens Hopperdietzel","doi":"10.16995/glossa.7686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on the lexicalization patterns of manner and result meaning in the main predicate, two resultative constructions can be distinguished, namely resultative secondary predication that lexicalizes the manner component, and means construction that lexicalize the result component. Notably, both constructions are unevenly distributed across languages (Talmy 2000, 1991). However, this typology is primarily based on non-serializing languages, such as English and Romance, in which the secondary manner or result predicate is necessarily non-verbal. This constrasts with resultatives in serializing languages, in which both the manner and result component are realized by verbal predicates, making it difficult to determine the underlying morphosyntactic status of the respective predicates. By investigating the morphosyntactic and semantic properties of resultative serial verb constructions (RSVCs) in two serializing languages, Mandarin and Samoan, I demonstrate that RSVCs are neither a unified or special phenomenon (contra Slobin 2004, Larson 1991), but show the same split observed in non-serializing languages. Further, these observations have broader implications on a unified configurational analysis of manner and result meaning within a syntactic account of event and argument structure building (cf. Folli & Harley 2020).","PeriodicalId":46319,"journal":{"name":"Glossa-A Journal of General Linguistics","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Glossa-A Journal of General Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.7686","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Based on the lexicalization patterns of manner and result meaning in the main predicate, two resultative constructions can be distinguished, namely resultative secondary predication that lexicalizes the manner component, and means construction that lexicalize the result component. Notably, both constructions are unevenly distributed across languages (Talmy 2000, 1991). However, this typology is primarily based on non-serializing languages, such as English and Romance, in which the secondary manner or result predicate is necessarily non-verbal. This constrasts with resultatives in serializing languages, in which both the manner and result component are realized by verbal predicates, making it difficult to determine the underlying morphosyntactic status of the respective predicates. By investigating the morphosyntactic and semantic properties of resultative serial verb constructions (RSVCs) in two serializing languages, Mandarin and Samoan, I demonstrate that RSVCs are neither a unified or special phenomenon (contra Slobin 2004, Larson 1991), but show the same split observed in non-serializing languages. Further, these observations have broader implications on a unified configurational analysis of manner and result meaning within a syntactic account of event and argument structure building (cf. Folli & Harley 2020).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Talmy在序列化语言中的类型学:VP的变体
根据主谓语中方式和结果意义的词汇化模式,可以区分出两种结果结构,即将方式成分词汇化的结果副谓语和将结果成分词汇化的结果结构。值得注意的是,这两种结构在不同语言中的分布是不均匀的(Talmy 2000, 1991)。然而,这种类型学主要基于非序列化语言,如英语和罗曼语,其中次要方式或结果谓词必然是非语言的。这与序列化语言中的结果式形成对比,在序列化语言中,方式和结果组件都是通过口头谓词实现的,因此很难确定各自谓词的基本形态句法状态。通过对汉语和萨摩亚语两种序列化语言的动连词结构(RSVCs)的形态句法和语义特征的研究,作者证明了动连词结构既不是一个统一的现象,也不是一个特殊的现象(contra Slobin 2004; Larson 1991),而是在非序列化语言中表现出同样的分裂现象。此外,这些观察结果对事件和论证结构构建的句法描述中的方式和结果意义的统一配置分析具有更广泛的影响(参见Folli & Harley 2020)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
62 weeks
期刊最新文献
Title Pending 10160 Title Pending 8932 Title Pending 8653 Title Pending 10229 Title Pending 9904
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1