Mastering DNA chromatogram analysis in Sanger sequencing for reliable clinical analysis.

IF 3.6 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology Pub Date : 2023-11-13 DOI:10.1186/s43141-023-00587-6
Mohammed Baqur S Al-Shuhaib, Hayder O Hashim
{"title":"Mastering DNA chromatogram analysis in Sanger sequencing for reliable clinical analysis.","authors":"Mohammed Baqur S Al-Shuhaib, Hayder O Hashim","doi":"10.1186/s43141-023-00587-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sanger dideoxy sequencing is vital in clinical analysis due to its accuracy, ability to analyze genetic markers like SNPs and STRs, capability to generate reliable DNA profiles, and its role in resolving complex clinical cases. The precision and robustness of Sanger sequencing contribute significantly to the scientific basis of clinical investigations. Though the reading of chromatograms seems to be a routine step, many errors conducted in PCR may lead to consequent limitations in the readings of AGCT peaks. These errors are possibly associated with improper DNA amplification and its subsequent interpretation of DNA sequencing files, such as noisy peaks, artifacts, and confusion between double-peak technical errors, heterozygosity, and double infection potentials. Thus, it is not feasible to read nucleic acid sequences without giving serious attention to these technical problems. To ensure the accuracy of DNA sequencing outcomes, it is also imperative to detect and rectify technical challenges that may lead to misinterpretation of the DNA sequence, resulting in errors and incongruities in subsequent analyses.</p><p><strong>Short conclusion: </strong>This overview sheds light on prominent technical concerns that can emerge prior to and during the interpretation of DNA chromatograms in Sanger sequencing, along with offering strategies to address them effectively. The significance of identifying and tackling these technical limitations during the chromatogram analysis is underscored in this review. Recognizing these concerns can aid in enhancing the quality of downstream analyses for Sanger sequencing results, which holds notable improvement in accuracy, reliability, and ability to provide crucial genetic information in clinical analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":74026,"journal":{"name":"Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10643650/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43141-023-00587-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sanger dideoxy sequencing is vital in clinical analysis due to its accuracy, ability to analyze genetic markers like SNPs and STRs, capability to generate reliable DNA profiles, and its role in resolving complex clinical cases. The precision and robustness of Sanger sequencing contribute significantly to the scientific basis of clinical investigations. Though the reading of chromatograms seems to be a routine step, many errors conducted in PCR may lead to consequent limitations in the readings of AGCT peaks. These errors are possibly associated with improper DNA amplification and its subsequent interpretation of DNA sequencing files, such as noisy peaks, artifacts, and confusion between double-peak technical errors, heterozygosity, and double infection potentials. Thus, it is not feasible to read nucleic acid sequences without giving serious attention to these technical problems. To ensure the accuracy of DNA sequencing outcomes, it is also imperative to detect and rectify technical challenges that may lead to misinterpretation of the DNA sequence, resulting in errors and incongruities in subsequent analyses.

Short conclusion: This overview sheds light on prominent technical concerns that can emerge prior to and during the interpretation of DNA chromatograms in Sanger sequencing, along with offering strategies to address them effectively. The significance of identifying and tackling these technical limitations during the chromatogram analysis is underscored in this review. Recognizing these concerns can aid in enhancing the quality of downstream analyses for Sanger sequencing results, which holds notable improvement in accuracy, reliability, and ability to provide crucial genetic information in clinical analysis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
掌握桑格测序中的DNA色谱分析,进行可靠的临床分析。
背景:Sanger双脱氧测序由于其准确性、分析snp和STRs等遗传标记的能力、生成可靠DNA谱的能力以及在解决复杂临床病例中的作用,在临床分析中至关重要。Sanger测序的精确性和稳健性为临床研究的科学基础做出了重要贡献。虽然色谱图的读取似乎是一个常规步骤,但PCR中进行的许多错误可能导致AGCT峰读取的限制。这些错误可能与不适当的DNA扩增及其随后对DNA测序文件的解释有关,例如噪声峰、伪影、双峰技术错误、杂合性和双重感染潜力之间的混淆。因此,如果不重视这些技术问题,读取核酸序列是不可行的。为了确保DNA测序结果的准确性,还必须检测和纠正可能导致DNA序列误解的技术挑战,从而导致后续分析中的错误和不一致。简短的结论:本综述揭示了在桑格测序中DNA色谱图解释之前和期间可能出现的突出技术问题,并提供了有效解决这些问题的策略。本综述强调了在色谱分析过程中识别和解决这些技术限制的意义。认识到这些问题有助于提高Sanger测序结果的下游分析质量,从而显著提高准确性、可靠性和在临床分析中提供关键遗传信息的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Physiochemical analyses and molecular characterization of heavy metal-resistant bacteria from Ilesha gold mining sites in Nigeria. Whole genome sequence and comparative genomics analysis of multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus xylosus NM36 isolated from a cow with mastitis in Basrah city. Immunoinformatics-aided rational design of multiepitope-based peptide vaccine (MEBV) targeting human parainfluenza virus 3 (HPIV-3) stable proteins. Isolation of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria from the agricultural fields of Tattiannaram, Telangana. Short tandem repeat (STR) variation from 6 cities in Iraq based on 15 loci.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1