The Evolution of Hand Proprioceptive and Motor Impairments in the Sub-Acute Phase After Stroke.

Neurorehabilitation and neural repair Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-13 DOI:10.1177/15459683231207355
Monika Zbytniewska-Mégret, Christian Salzmann, Christoph M Kanzler, Thomas Hassa, Roger Gassert, Olivier Lambercy, Joachim Liepert
{"title":"The Evolution of Hand Proprioceptive and Motor Impairments in the Sub-Acute Phase After Stroke.","authors":"Monika Zbytniewska-Mégret, Christian Salzmann, Christoph M Kanzler, Thomas Hassa, Roger Gassert, Olivier Lambercy, Joachim Liepert","doi":"10.1177/15459683231207355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hand proprioception is essential for fine movements and therefore many activities of daily living. Although frequently impaired after stroke, it is unclear how hand proprioception evolves in the sub-acute phase and whether it follows a similar pattern of changes as motor impairments.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This work investigates whether there is a corresponding pattern of changes over time in hand proprioception and motor function as comprehensively quantified by a combination of robotic, clinical, and neurophysiological assessments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Finger proprioception (position sense) and motor function (force, velocity, range of motion) were evaluated using robotic assessments at baseline (<3 months after stroke) and up to 4 weeks later (discharge). Clinical assessments (among others, Box & Block Test [BBT]) as well as Somatosensory/Motor Evoked Potentials (SSEP/MEP) were additionally performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Complete datasets from 45 participants post-stroke were obtained. For 42% of all study participants proprioception and motor function had a dissociated pattern of changes (only 1 function considerably improved). This dissociation was either due to the absence of a measurable impairment in 1 modality at baseline, or due to a severe lesion of central somatosensory or motor tracts (absent SSEP/MEP). Better baseline BBT correlated with proprioceptive gains, while proprioceptive impairment at baseline did not correlate with change in BBT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Proprioception and motor function frequently followed a dissociated pattern of changes in sub-acute stroke. This highlights the importance of monitoring both functions, which could help to further personalize therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94158,"journal":{"name":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","volume":" ","pages":"823-836"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10685702/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683231207355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Hand proprioception is essential for fine movements and therefore many activities of daily living. Although frequently impaired after stroke, it is unclear how hand proprioception evolves in the sub-acute phase and whether it follows a similar pattern of changes as motor impairments.

Objective: This work investigates whether there is a corresponding pattern of changes over time in hand proprioception and motor function as comprehensively quantified by a combination of robotic, clinical, and neurophysiological assessments.

Methods: Finger proprioception (position sense) and motor function (force, velocity, range of motion) were evaluated using robotic assessments at baseline (<3 months after stroke) and up to 4 weeks later (discharge). Clinical assessments (among others, Box & Block Test [BBT]) as well as Somatosensory/Motor Evoked Potentials (SSEP/MEP) were additionally performed.

Results: Complete datasets from 45 participants post-stroke were obtained. For 42% of all study participants proprioception and motor function had a dissociated pattern of changes (only 1 function considerably improved). This dissociation was either due to the absence of a measurable impairment in 1 modality at baseline, or due to a severe lesion of central somatosensory or motor tracts (absent SSEP/MEP). Better baseline BBT correlated with proprioceptive gains, while proprioceptive impairment at baseline did not correlate with change in BBT.

Conclusions: Proprioception and motor function frequently followed a dissociated pattern of changes in sub-acute stroke. This highlights the importance of monitoring both functions, which could help to further personalize therapies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脑卒中亚急性期手部本体感觉和运动功能障碍的演变。
背景:手部本体感觉是精细运动和许多日常生活活动所必需的。虽然在中风后经常受损,但目前尚不清楚手本体感觉在亚急性期是如何演变的,以及它是否遵循与运动损伤相似的变化模式。目的:本研究通过机器人、临床和神经生理评估的综合量化,探讨了手本体感觉和运动功能是否存在相应的随时间变化模式。方法:在基线时使用机器人评估评估手指本体感觉(位置感)和运动功能(力、速度、运动范围)(结果:获得45名参与者中风后的完整数据集)。42%的研究参与者本体感觉和运动功能有分离的改变模式(只有一个功能有明显改善)。这种分离要么是由于基线时1个模态没有可测量的损伤,要么是由于中枢性体感觉束或运动束的严重损伤(缺乏SSEP/MEP)。基线时更好的BBT与本体感觉的增加相关,而基线时本体感觉的损伤与BBT的变化无关。结论:在亚急性脑卒中中,本体感觉和运动功能经常发生分离性改变。这突出了监测这两种功能的重要性,这可能有助于进一步个性化治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reinforcement Learning is Impaired in the Sub-acute Post-stroke Period. Post-Stroke Recovery in Relation to Parvalbumin-Positive Interneurons and Perineuronal Nets. Mapping Trajectories of Gait Recovery in Clinical Stroke Rehabilitation. Exploring Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Effects on Physical Outcomes in People With Parkinson's Disease: An Umbrella Evidence Mapping Review With Meta-analyses. Acute and Longitudinal Effects of Concussion on Reactive Balance in Collegiate Athletes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1