The Evolution of Hand Proprioceptive and Motor Impairments in the Sub-Acute Phase After Stroke.

IF 3.7 Neurorehabilitation and neural repair Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-13 DOI:10.1177/15459683231207355
Monika Zbytniewska-Mégret, Christian Salzmann, Christoph M Kanzler, Thomas Hassa, Roger Gassert, Olivier Lambercy, Joachim Liepert
{"title":"The Evolution of Hand Proprioceptive and Motor Impairments in the Sub-Acute Phase After Stroke.","authors":"Monika Zbytniewska-Mégret, Christian Salzmann, Christoph M Kanzler, Thomas Hassa, Roger Gassert, Olivier Lambercy, Joachim Liepert","doi":"10.1177/15459683231207355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hand proprioception is essential for fine movements and therefore many activities of daily living. Although frequently impaired after stroke, it is unclear how hand proprioception evolves in the sub-acute phase and whether it follows a similar pattern of changes as motor impairments.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This work investigates whether there is a corresponding pattern of changes over time in hand proprioception and motor function as comprehensively quantified by a combination of robotic, clinical, and neurophysiological assessments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Finger proprioception (position sense) and motor function (force, velocity, range of motion) were evaluated using robotic assessments at baseline (<3 months after stroke) and up to 4 weeks later (discharge). Clinical assessments (among others, Box & Block Test [BBT]) as well as Somatosensory/Motor Evoked Potentials (SSEP/MEP) were additionally performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Complete datasets from 45 participants post-stroke were obtained. For 42% of all study participants proprioception and motor function had a dissociated pattern of changes (only 1 function considerably improved). This dissociation was either due to the absence of a measurable impairment in 1 modality at baseline, or due to a severe lesion of central somatosensory or motor tracts (absent SSEP/MEP). Better baseline BBT correlated with proprioceptive gains, while proprioceptive impairment at baseline did not correlate with change in BBT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Proprioception and motor function frequently followed a dissociated pattern of changes in sub-acute stroke. This highlights the importance of monitoring both functions, which could help to further personalize therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94158,"journal":{"name":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","volume":" ","pages":"823-836"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10685702/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683231207355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hand proprioception is essential for fine movements and therefore many activities of daily living. Although frequently impaired after stroke, it is unclear how hand proprioception evolves in the sub-acute phase and whether it follows a similar pattern of changes as motor impairments.

Objective: This work investigates whether there is a corresponding pattern of changes over time in hand proprioception and motor function as comprehensively quantified by a combination of robotic, clinical, and neurophysiological assessments.

Methods: Finger proprioception (position sense) and motor function (force, velocity, range of motion) were evaluated using robotic assessments at baseline (<3 months after stroke) and up to 4 weeks later (discharge). Clinical assessments (among others, Box & Block Test [BBT]) as well as Somatosensory/Motor Evoked Potentials (SSEP/MEP) were additionally performed.

Results: Complete datasets from 45 participants post-stroke were obtained. For 42% of all study participants proprioception and motor function had a dissociated pattern of changes (only 1 function considerably improved). This dissociation was either due to the absence of a measurable impairment in 1 modality at baseline, or due to a severe lesion of central somatosensory or motor tracts (absent SSEP/MEP). Better baseline BBT correlated with proprioceptive gains, while proprioceptive impairment at baseline did not correlate with change in BBT.

Conclusions: Proprioception and motor function frequently followed a dissociated pattern of changes in sub-acute stroke. This highlights the importance of monitoring both functions, which could help to further personalize therapies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脑卒中亚急性期手部本体感觉和运动功能障碍的演变。
背景:手部本体感觉是精细运动和许多日常生活活动所必需的。虽然在中风后经常受损,但目前尚不清楚手本体感觉在亚急性期是如何演变的,以及它是否遵循与运动损伤相似的变化模式。目的:本研究通过机器人、临床和神经生理评估的综合量化,探讨了手本体感觉和运动功能是否存在相应的随时间变化模式。方法:在基线时使用机器人评估评估手指本体感觉(位置感)和运动功能(力、速度、运动范围)(结果:获得45名参与者中风后的完整数据集)。42%的研究参与者本体感觉和运动功能有分离的改变模式(只有一个功能有明显改善)。这种分离要么是由于基线时1个模态没有可测量的损伤,要么是由于中枢性体感觉束或运动束的严重损伤(缺乏SSEP/MEP)。基线时更好的BBT与本体感觉的增加相关,而基线时本体感觉的损伤与BBT的变化无关。结论:在亚急性脑卒中中,本体感觉和运动功能经常发生分离性改变。这突出了监测这两种功能的重要性,这可能有助于进一步个性化治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Neurorehabilitation in the 21st Century: New Science, New Strategies, New Expectations. Preregistration and Transparency in Neurorehabilitation Research. Motor, Cognitive, Psychological, and Neural Predictors of Concern About Falling in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis. Pelvic Floor Dysfunction and Rehabilitation in Neurological Disorders: Bridging Pathophysiology With Multidisciplinary Approaches-A Focused Mini-Review. Effect of Brain-Computer Interface-Controlled Ankle Robot Training on Post-Stroke Motor Rehabilitation and Resting QEEG Neuroplasticity: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1