Let's Meet Halfway: Sharing New Responsibilities in a Digital Age

IF 1 Q3 COMMUNICATION Journal of Information Policy Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI:10.5325/jinfopoli.9.1.0336
A. Heldt
{"title":"Let's Meet Halfway: Sharing New Responsibilities in a Digital Age","authors":"A. Heldt","doi":"10.5325/jinfopoli.9.1.0336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Which legal instrument can effectively address current challenges in social media governance and how do companies take their share, shifting away from opaque enforcement of terms of services and increasingly copying governmental structures? In a first step, this article describes and analyzes the way that states address hate speech and misinformation in their respective regulatory projects. Secondly, it examines how social media platforms sanction unwanted content and integrate (or plan on integrating) procedural rules such as appeal and due process principles in their moderation policies. Large social media platforms tend to adopt new structures that resemble administrative law—an uncommon development for non-state actors.","PeriodicalId":55617,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Policy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/jinfopoli.9.1.0336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Which legal instrument can effectively address current challenges in social media governance and how do companies take their share, shifting away from opaque enforcement of terms of services and increasingly copying governmental structures? In a first step, this article describes and analyzes the way that states address hate speech and misinformation in their respective regulatory projects. Secondly, it examines how social media platforms sanction unwanted content and integrate (or plan on integrating) procedural rules such as appeal and due process principles in their moderation policies. Large social media platforms tend to adopt new structures that resemble administrative law—an uncommon development for non-state actors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
让我们各让一半:在数字时代分担新的责任
哪些法律文书可以有效地解决当前社交媒体治理方面的挑战?公司如何从不透明的服务条款执行和越来越多地复制政府结构中分得一杯羹?首先,本文描述并分析了各州在各自的监管项目中处理仇恨言论和错误信息的方式。其次,它研究了社交媒体平台如何制裁不受欢迎的内容,并在其审核政策中整合(或计划整合)上诉和正当程序原则等程序规则。大型社交媒体平台倾向于采用类似行政法的新结构——这对非国家行为体来说是一种罕见的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Universal Access and Its Asymmetries: The Untold Story of the Last 200 Years Using a Digital Entertainment Tax to Strengthen Local Information Infrastructure in The United States: A Conceptual Exploration Access to the Internet and Declining Democracy in Venezuela Pandemic, Hoaxes and Information Security of Kazakhstan Research Handbook on Information Policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1