Effects of Cognitive-Behavioral Group Therapy on Increased Life Expectancy of Male Patients with Gastric Cancer

E. M. Akerdi, P. Askari, R. Hassanzadeh, H. Ahadi, F. Naderi
{"title":"Effects of Cognitive-Behavioral Group Therapy on Increased Life Expectancy of Male Patients with Gastric Cancer","authors":"E. M. Akerdi, P. Askari, R. Hassanzadeh, H. Ahadi, F. Naderi","doi":"10.18869/ACADPUB.JBUMS.20.12.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"J Babol Univ Med Sci; 18(6); Jun 2016; PP: 42-46 Received: Jun 1 2016, Revised: Jan 6 2016, Accepted: Nov 9 2015. ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Cancers are a broad group of diseases, each having their own etiology, treatment, and prognosis. The majority of cancer patients experience a period of mental stress during their disease. Given the effective role of life expectancy in dealing with chronic diseases, such as stomach cancer, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of cognitive-behavioral group therapy on increased life expectancy of male patients with gastric cancer. METHODS: This quasi-experiment was conducted on 92 male patients with gastric cancer referring to Tuba Medical Center, Sari, Iran in 2014. Patients were randomly divided into two groups of test (n=46) and control (n=46). The two groups completed the Adult Hope Scale (AHS) by Snyder in pretest stage. At the next stage, samples of the test group were exposed to 10 sessions of cognitive-behavioral group therapy (each session: 90 min), while the control group did not receive any special treatment. Both study groups completed the questionnaire again at the posttest stage, followed by the comparison of results. FINDINGS: In terms of life expectancy, mean scores of the test and control groups at the pretest stage were 37.21±4.7 and 36.26±4.73, respectively. Meanwhile, mean scores of the mentioned groups at the posttest stage were 40.02±3.87 and 36.23±4.8, respectively. A significant increase was observed in the mean scores of test and control groups at the posttest stage compared to before the intervention. Moreover, a significant difference was found between the study groups regarding life expectancy and its components (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: According to the results, cognitive-behavioral group therapy could increase life expectancy in patients with gastric cancer.","PeriodicalId":15108,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Babol University of Medical Sciences","volume":"36 1","pages":"28-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Babol University of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18869/ACADPUB.JBUMS.20.12.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

J Babol Univ Med Sci; 18(6); Jun 2016; PP: 42-46 Received: Jun 1 2016, Revised: Jan 6 2016, Accepted: Nov 9 2015. ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Cancers are a broad group of diseases, each having their own etiology, treatment, and prognosis. The majority of cancer patients experience a period of mental stress during their disease. Given the effective role of life expectancy in dealing with chronic diseases, such as stomach cancer, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of cognitive-behavioral group therapy on increased life expectancy of male patients with gastric cancer. METHODS: This quasi-experiment was conducted on 92 male patients with gastric cancer referring to Tuba Medical Center, Sari, Iran in 2014. Patients were randomly divided into two groups of test (n=46) and control (n=46). The two groups completed the Adult Hope Scale (AHS) by Snyder in pretest stage. At the next stage, samples of the test group were exposed to 10 sessions of cognitive-behavioral group therapy (each session: 90 min), while the control group did not receive any special treatment. Both study groups completed the questionnaire again at the posttest stage, followed by the comparison of results. FINDINGS: In terms of life expectancy, mean scores of the test and control groups at the pretest stage were 37.21±4.7 and 36.26±4.73, respectively. Meanwhile, mean scores of the mentioned groups at the posttest stage were 40.02±3.87 and 36.23±4.8, respectively. A significant increase was observed in the mean scores of test and control groups at the posttest stage compared to before the intervention. Moreover, a significant difference was found between the study groups regarding life expectancy and its components (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: According to the results, cognitive-behavioral group therapy could increase life expectancy in patients with gastric cancer.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认知行为团体治疗对提高男性胃癌患者预期寿命的影响
巴宝勒大学医学杂志;18 (6);6月2016;收稿日期:2016年6月1日,修稿日期:2016年1月6日,收稿日期:2015年11月9日。背景与目的:癌症是一个广泛的疾病群体,每一个都有自己的病因、治疗和预后。大多数癌症患者在患病期间都会经历一段时间的精神压力期。鉴于预期寿命在治疗慢性疾病(如胃癌)中的有效作用,本研究旨在评估认知行为团体治疗对提高男性胃癌患者预期寿命的影响。方法:选取2014年在伊朗萨里Tuba医疗中心就诊的92例男性胃癌患者进行准实验。患者随机分为两组,试验组(n=46)和对照组(n=46)。两组在测试前完成Snyder的成人希望量表(AHS)。在下一阶段,实验组的样本接受了10次认知行为团体治疗(每次90分钟),而对照组没有接受任何特殊治疗。两个研究组在测试后阶段再次完成问卷,然后进行结果比较。结果:在预期寿命方面,试验组和对照组在前测期的平均得分分别为37.21±4.7分和36.26±4.73分。与此同时,各组后测期平均得分分别为40.02±3.87分和36.23±4.8分。与干预前相比,测试组和对照组在测试后阶段的平均得分显著增加。此外,研究组之间在预期寿命及其组成部分方面存在显著差异(p<0.01)。结论:认知行为团体治疗可提高胃癌患者的预期寿命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
نقش پیشگویی کننده لکوسیتوز، آنمی و ترومبوسیتوز قبل از جراحی با شدت تومورهای اپیتلیالی تخمدان ژن های عامل بیماری ادرار شربت افرا ، پاتو مکانیسم مولکولی بیماری و جهش های جمعیت ایران Nurses’ Experience of Pain Management in Patients Referred to the Emergency Department A Case Report of Mucopolysaccharidosis Type VI Maternal Exposure to Air Pollution and Fetal Abnormalities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1