Analysis of risk factors for non-curative resection after endoscopic submucosal dissection in early esophageal cancer and high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia

Jiajia Yang, Yini Dang, Lei Peng, Duochen Jin, Huaiming Sang, Meihong Chen
{"title":"Analysis of risk factors for non-curative resection after endoscopic submucosal dissection in early esophageal cancer and high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia","authors":"Jiajia Yang, Yini Dang, Lei Peng, Duochen Jin, Huaiming Sang, Meihong Chen","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1432.2019.06.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo investigate the risk factors for non-curative resection after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early esophageal cancer and high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia. \n \n \nMethods \nThe clinicopathological data of 427 cases of early esophageal cancer and high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia who underwent ESD was performed from January 2013 to December 2016 in the Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University were retrospectively analyzed. According to the results of postoperative pathology and immunohistochemistry, 339 patients were defined as curative resection group and 88 patients were defined as non-curative resection group. Chi-square test, univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used for statistical analysis. \n \n \nResults \nA total of 427 patients were enrolled in this study, with an average age of (63.2±7.7) years, including 96 cases of early esophageal cancer and 331 cases of high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia. The enbloc resection rate of ESD was 94.8%(405/427), 88 of them were non-curative resected, and the non-curative resection rate was 20.6%. Univariate analysis showed that early esophageal cancer (odds ratio (OR)=3.682, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.216 to 6.118, P<0.01), submucosal infiltration (OR=10.220, 95%CI4.861 to 21.481, P<0.01), ESD indications (OR=6.005, 95%CI3.545 to 10.172, P<0.01) and lifting sign after injecting at the base of lesions (OR=2.508, 95%CI1.005 to 6.255, P=0.042) were statistically significant between non-curative resection group and curative resection group. Multivariate unconditional logistic regression analysis revealed that submucosal infiltration (OR=4.329, 95%CI1.758 to 10.661, P=0.001), not absolute indications of ESD (OR=6.484, 95%CI2.205 to 19.068, P=0.001) and negative lifting sign (OR=3.182, 95%CI1.171 to 8.651, P=0.023) were independent risk factors for non-curative resection. \n \n \nConclusions \nPatients with early esophageal cancer, submucosal infiltration, not absolute indications for ESD and negative lifting signs are prone to non-curative resection. Moreover, submucosal infiltration, not absolute indications for ESD, and negative lifting signs are the independent risk factors for non-curative resection. \n \n \nKey words: \nEndoscopic submucosal dissection; Early esophageal cancer; Precancerous lesions; Non-curative resection","PeriodicalId":10009,"journal":{"name":"中华消化杂志","volume":"1 1","pages":"379-383"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华消化杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1432.2019.06.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To investigate the risk factors for non-curative resection after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early esophageal cancer and high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia. Methods The clinicopathological data of 427 cases of early esophageal cancer and high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia who underwent ESD was performed from January 2013 to December 2016 in the Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University were retrospectively analyzed. According to the results of postoperative pathology and immunohistochemistry, 339 patients were defined as curative resection group and 88 patients were defined as non-curative resection group. Chi-square test, univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used for statistical analysis. Results A total of 427 patients were enrolled in this study, with an average age of (63.2±7.7) years, including 96 cases of early esophageal cancer and 331 cases of high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia. The enbloc resection rate of ESD was 94.8%(405/427), 88 of them were non-curative resected, and the non-curative resection rate was 20.6%. Univariate analysis showed that early esophageal cancer (odds ratio (OR)=3.682, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.216 to 6.118, P<0.01), submucosal infiltration (OR=10.220, 95%CI4.861 to 21.481, P<0.01), ESD indications (OR=6.005, 95%CI3.545 to 10.172, P<0.01) and lifting sign after injecting at the base of lesions (OR=2.508, 95%CI1.005 to 6.255, P=0.042) were statistically significant between non-curative resection group and curative resection group. Multivariate unconditional logistic regression analysis revealed that submucosal infiltration (OR=4.329, 95%CI1.758 to 10.661, P=0.001), not absolute indications of ESD (OR=6.484, 95%CI2.205 to 19.068, P=0.001) and negative lifting sign (OR=3.182, 95%CI1.171 to 8.651, P=0.023) were independent risk factors for non-curative resection. Conclusions Patients with early esophageal cancer, submucosal infiltration, not absolute indications for ESD and negative lifting signs are prone to non-curative resection. Moreover, submucosal infiltration, not absolute indications for ESD, and negative lifting signs are the independent risk factors for non-curative resection. Key words: Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Early esophageal cancer; Precancerous lesions; Non-curative resection
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期食管癌及高级别上皮内瘤变内镜下粘膜下夹层非治性切除的危险因素分析
目的探讨内镜下粘膜下剥离术(ESD)治疗早期食管癌及高级别上皮内瘤变的危险因素。方法回顾性分析2013年1月至2016年12月南京医科大学第一附属医院消化内科行ESD手术的427例早期食管癌伴高级别上皮内瘤变患者的临床病理资料。根据术后病理及免疫组化结果,339例患者定义为治愈切除组,88例患者定义为非治愈切除组。采用卡方检验、单因素分析和多因素logistic回归分析进行统计分析。结果共纳入427例患者,平均年龄(63.2±7.7)岁,其中早期食管癌96例,高级别上皮内瘤变331例。ESD的整体切除率为94.8%(405/427),其中88例为不可治愈性切除,不可治愈性切除率为20.6%。单因素分析显示,早期食管癌(优势比(OR)=3.682, 95%可信区间(CI) 2.216 ~ 6.118, P<0.01)、粘膜下浸润(OR=10.220, 95% ci4.861 ~ 21.481, P<0.01)、ESD指征(OR=6.005, 95% ci3.545 ~ 10.172, P<0.01)、病灶底部注射后提升征候(OR=2.508, 95% ci1.005 ~ 6.255, P=0.042)在非治愈性切除组与治愈性切除组之间差异均有统计学意义。多因素无条件logistic回归分析显示,粘膜下浸润(OR=4.329, 95%CI1.758 ~ 10.661, P=0.001)、非绝对指征ESD (OR=6.484, 95%CI2.205 ~ 19.068, P=0.001)和阴性举征(OR=3.182, 95%CI1.171 ~ 8.651, P=0.023)是非根治性切除的独立危险因素。结论早期食管癌、黏膜下浸润、非绝对指征ESD及阴性举征患者易行非治性切除。此外,粘膜下浸润,非ESD的绝对指征,以及负举征是非根治性切除的独立危险因素。关键词:内镜下粘膜下剥离;早期食管癌;癌前病变;Non-curative切除
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8016
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Clinical characteristics of gastrointestinal symptoms and liver function injury in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 Clinical characteristics of 70 patients with coronavirus disease 2019 accompanied with diarrhea Pay attention to the etiological analysis and management of 2019 coronavirus disease associated liver injury Considerations and suggestions on clinical research for coronavirus disease 2019 Digestive system manifestations and analysis of disease severity in 54 patients with coronavirus disease 2019
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1