Combating the Challenges of Intellectual Freedom: The Perspective of Librarians in Academic Libraries in Kwara State, Nigeria

A. Tella, Adeshewa Benita Adeboye, S. A. Abdulkareem, O. Olaniyi, Peter Odeh
{"title":"Combating the Challenges of Intellectual Freedom: The Perspective of Librarians in Academic Libraries in Kwara State, Nigeria","authors":"A. Tella, Adeshewa Benita Adeboye, S. A. Abdulkareem, O. Olaniyi, Peter Odeh","doi":"10.5339/jist.2021.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Background: Censorship of library materials denies people's right to access, use, retrieve, and store materials of their desire. Intellectual freedom is critical to eliminating the constraint of censorship. Issues such as illiteracy, societal standards, and selection policy hadbeen identified as challenges to intellectual freedom. The existing body of literature revealed that library materials are subjected to censorship and this denies readers’ rights to access desirable information at any point in time. Aim: This research examined the perception of librarians on combating the challenges of intellectual freedom. Methodology: The target population for this study included professional librarians working in eight (8) selected academic libraries in Kwara State, Nigeria. A stratified random sampling technique was used to select 60 respondents from the 8 academic libraries involved in the study. A questionnaire of 6 research questions was developed for the collection of data. Findings: The results indicated: the majority of the respondents agree that there are equal opportunities for library users to access library materials, obscene and controversial materials are subjected to censorship, library selection policy restricts library users’ access to desired materials. Lifting restriction of access to library materials was identified as the way to combat the challenges of intellectual freedom. Recommendations: The authors recommends that government should ensure that the Freedom of Information Bill (FOI) is passed to enable library patrons’ have access to all information materials and that library stakeholders should create awareness, publicity, or enlightenment on intellectual freedom to inform the users of their rights to hold, use, and access information materials of their choice.","PeriodicalId":16179,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Studies & Technology (JIS&T)","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Studies & Technology (JIS&T)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5339/jist.2021.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Censorship of library materials denies people's right to access, use, retrieve, and store materials of their desire. Intellectual freedom is critical to eliminating the constraint of censorship. Issues such as illiteracy, societal standards, and selection policy hadbeen identified as challenges to intellectual freedom. The existing body of literature revealed that library materials are subjected to censorship and this denies readers’ rights to access desirable information at any point in time. Aim: This research examined the perception of librarians on combating the challenges of intellectual freedom. Methodology: The target population for this study included professional librarians working in eight (8) selected academic libraries in Kwara State, Nigeria. A stratified random sampling technique was used to select 60 respondents from the 8 academic libraries involved in the study. A questionnaire of 6 research questions was developed for the collection of data. Findings: The results indicated: the majority of the respondents agree that there are equal opportunities for library users to access library materials, obscene and controversial materials are subjected to censorship, library selection policy restricts library users’ access to desired materials. Lifting restriction of access to library materials was identified as the way to combat the challenges of intellectual freedom. Recommendations: The authors recommends that government should ensure that the Freedom of Information Bill (FOI) is passed to enable library patrons’ have access to all information materials and that library stakeholders should create awareness, publicity, or enlightenment on intellectual freedom to inform the users of their rights to hold, use, and access information materials of their choice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应对知识自由的挑战:尼日利亚夸拉州学术图书馆图书馆员的视角
背景:对图书馆资料的审查剥夺了人们获取、使用、检索和储存他们想要的资料的权利。知识自由对于消除审查制度的限制至关重要。文盲、社会标准和选拔政策等问题被认为是对知识自由的挑战。现有的文献表明,图书馆资料受到审查,这剥夺了读者在任何时间点获取所需信息的权利。目的:本研究考察了图书馆员对对抗知识自由挑战的看法。方法:本研究的目标人群包括在尼日利亚夸拉州八(8)个选定的学术图书馆工作的专业图书馆员。采用分层随机抽样的方法,从参与研究的8所高校图书馆中抽取60名受访者。为了收集数据,制定了一份包含6个研究问题的问卷。调查结果显示:大部分受访者认同图书馆使用者取得图书馆资料的机会均等、淫秽及争议性资料受到审查、图书馆选择政策限制图书馆使用者取得所需资料。取消获取图书馆资料的限制被认为是对抗知识自由挑战的方法。建议:作者建议政府应确保通过《信息自由法案》(Freedom of Information Bill, FOI),使图书馆用户能够获得所有信息资料,图书馆利益相关者应提高对知识自由的认识、宣传或启蒙,告知用户他们拥有、使用和获取自己选择的信息资料的权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Promoting information literacy in public universities: role of librarians مدى فعالية استخدام روبوتات المحادثة التوليدية Chatbot في تعزيز مشاركة المعرفة لدى أفراد المجتمع السعودي فوائد استثمار السجلات الصحية الإلكترونية في تقديم الرعاية الصحية في وزارة الصحة بسلطنة عمان: المستشفى السلطاني نموذجاً تطبيقات وتحديات الذكاء الاصطناعي في السياحة والضيافة الدينية: مراجعة منهجية الذكاء الاصطناعي وإنشاء الميتاداتا
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1