Relying on ST Segment Depression alone to Predict Ischemic Heart Disease- How Far We can Go ?

M. Alam, M. M. Rahman, T. Parvin, Khurshed Ahmed, S. Habib, Md Fakhrul Islam Khaled, Md. Azharul Islam, Md Ahasanul Kabir Shahin, Kamruzzaman Siddiki, Md Al Amin
{"title":"Relying on ST Segment Depression alone to Predict Ischemic Heart Disease- How Far We can Go ?","authors":"M. Alam, M. M. Rahman, T. Parvin, Khurshed Ahmed, S. Habib, Md Fakhrul Islam Khaled, Md. Azharul Islam, Md Ahasanul Kabir Shahin, Kamruzzaman Siddiki, Md Al Amin","doi":"10.3329/uhj.v17i1.50874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Ischemic heart disease (IHD) or coronary artery disease (CAD) has become predominant cause of death across the world and frequently stable angina, which is the most common presentation of this disease, gives hard time to reach a proper diagnosis due to duality of non-invasive testing. While Exercise Treadmill Test (ETT) is an inexpensive non-invasive modality which may have many output depending on method of interpretation, ST segment depression is much utilized but traditionally less perfect than available treadmill scores. We have compared its accuracy to Duke Treadmill Score (DTS), Simple Treadmill Score (STS) and Cleveland Clinic Score (CCS) among Bangladesh people to generate a local insight. \nObjective: To estimate and compare accuracy of ST segment response, DTS, Simple Treadmill Score and Cleveland Clinic Score to predict CAD. \nMethod: In a cross-sectional study total 130 patients who had visited at a medical university with stable chest pain were selected according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria over one year. After taking proper history and physical examination their ETT report and Coronary Angiogram (CAG) finding, which were done according to indication defined by their consultants. ETT interpretation as ST segment response and treadmill scores were compared with gold standard test for CAD that is CAG. Accuracy of STdepression and treadmill scores were calculated by the formula “Accuracy = TP+TN / Total Sample”. \nResult: Among the total sample (n=130) male and female were 93 & 37, respectively. Nearly half of male sample fell into 5th decade and around same portion of female sample was in 4th decade. About 58%, 28% & 14% patients came with typical, atypical & non-cardiac chest pain. As calculated with above mentioned formula accuracy of ST segment response alone to diagnose IHD came about 68.4% (p value 0.004). Similarly DTS, STS and CCS had 83.3%, 83.9% and 77.2% accuracy, respectively (p value 0.000). \nConclusion: During ETT relying on ST segment depression alone to diagnose CAD is significantly less accurate than treadmill scores namely, Duke Treadmill Score, Simple treadmill Score or Cleveland Clinic Score. Applying any of these treadmill scores during exercise test interpretation can identify ischemic heart disease patients with more accuracy. \nUniversity Heart Journal Vol. 17, No. 1, Jan 2021; 10-15","PeriodicalId":23424,"journal":{"name":"University Heart Journal","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/uhj.v17i1.50874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Ischemic heart disease (IHD) or coronary artery disease (CAD) has become predominant cause of death across the world and frequently stable angina, which is the most common presentation of this disease, gives hard time to reach a proper diagnosis due to duality of non-invasive testing. While Exercise Treadmill Test (ETT) is an inexpensive non-invasive modality which may have many output depending on method of interpretation, ST segment depression is much utilized but traditionally less perfect than available treadmill scores. We have compared its accuracy to Duke Treadmill Score (DTS), Simple Treadmill Score (STS) and Cleveland Clinic Score (CCS) among Bangladesh people to generate a local insight. Objective: To estimate and compare accuracy of ST segment response, DTS, Simple Treadmill Score and Cleveland Clinic Score to predict CAD. Method: In a cross-sectional study total 130 patients who had visited at a medical university with stable chest pain were selected according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria over one year. After taking proper history and physical examination their ETT report and Coronary Angiogram (CAG) finding, which were done according to indication defined by their consultants. ETT interpretation as ST segment response and treadmill scores were compared with gold standard test for CAD that is CAG. Accuracy of STdepression and treadmill scores were calculated by the formula “Accuracy = TP+TN / Total Sample”. Result: Among the total sample (n=130) male and female were 93 & 37, respectively. Nearly half of male sample fell into 5th decade and around same portion of female sample was in 4th decade. About 58%, 28% & 14% patients came with typical, atypical & non-cardiac chest pain. As calculated with above mentioned formula accuracy of ST segment response alone to diagnose IHD came about 68.4% (p value 0.004). Similarly DTS, STS and CCS had 83.3%, 83.9% and 77.2% accuracy, respectively (p value 0.000). Conclusion: During ETT relying on ST segment depression alone to diagnose CAD is significantly less accurate than treadmill scores namely, Duke Treadmill Score, Simple treadmill Score or Cleveland Clinic Score. Applying any of these treadmill scores during exercise test interpretation can identify ischemic heart disease patients with more accuracy. University Heart Journal Vol. 17, No. 1, Jan 2021; 10-15
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单靠ST段凹陷预测缺血性心脏病——我们能走多远?
简介:缺血性心脏病(IHD)或冠状动脉疾病(CAD)已成为世界各地死亡的主要原因,而稳定型心绞痛是这种疾病最常见的表现,由于非侵入性检查的双重性,使其难以得到正确的诊断。虽然运动跑步机测试(ETT)是一种廉价的非侵入性方法,根据解释方法可能有许多输出,但ST段抑郁被广泛利用,但传统上不如可用的跑步机评分完美。我们将其准确性与杜克跑步机评分(DTS)、简单跑步机评分(STS)和克利夫兰诊所评分(CCS)在孟加拉国人中的准确性进行了比较,以获得当地的见解。目的:评价和比较ST段反应、DTS、简单跑步机评分和克利夫兰临床评分预测冠心病的准确性。方法:在横断面研究中,根据预先确定的纳入和排除标准,选择130例在一年内就诊的医科大学稳定胸痛患者。在进行了适当的病史和体格检查后,他们的ETT报告和冠状动脉血管造影(CAG)发现是根据他们的顾问定义的适应症完成的。将ETT解释为ST段反应和跑步机评分与CAD的金标准测试(CAG)进行比较。STdepression和跑步机评分的准确性按公式“准确率= TP+TN /总样本”计算。结果:总样本(n=130)中,男性93例,女性37例。近一半的男性样本处于第5个十年,大约相同比例的女性样本处于第4个十年。约58%,28%和14%的患者出现典型,非典型和非心源性胸痛。根据上述公式计算,单纯ST段反应诊断IHD的准确率约为68.4% (p值0.004)。DTS、STS和CCS的准确率分别为83.3%、83.9%和77.2% (p值0.000)。结论:在ETT中,仅依靠ST段凹陷来诊断CAD的准确性明显低于跑步机评分,即Duke treadmill Score、Simple treadmill Score或Cleveland Clinic Score。在运动测试解释中应用这些跑步机评分可以更准确地识别缺血性心脏病患者。《大学心脏杂志》第17卷第1期,2021年1月;10 - 15
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association of Cardiac Troponin I Levels with the Severity of Coronary Artery Disease in Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Awareness on MINOCA Minimally Invasive Ascending Aortic Replacement with Concomitant Aortic Valve Replacement, A Case Report The outcome of Autogenous Venous Graft Vs Prosthetic Graft in Peripheral Arterial Disease- Study in Bangladesh Correlation between the GRACE Risk Score and the SYNTAX Score in Patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1