Clinical effect of repetitive functional magnetic stimulation of sacral nerve roots on urinary retention after spinal cord injury: a case-control study

Jing-Jing Zhang, Yan Chen, Lingsong Wu, Fang Gao, Yan Li, Bing-Chen An
{"title":"Clinical effect of repetitive functional magnetic stimulation of sacral nerve roots on urinary retention after spinal cord injury: a case-control study","authors":"Jing-Jing Zhang, Yan Chen, Lingsong Wu, Fang Gao, Yan Li, Bing-Chen An","doi":"10.4103/2773-2398.340142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Urinary retention is a serious complication of spinal cord injury. This study examined whether repetitive functional magnetic stimulation (rFMS) applied over the sacral nerve root affected bladder function or mood in patients with urinary retention after spinal cord injury. This single-center, case-control study included 32 patients with detrusor flaccid neurogenic bladder after spinal cord injury, who were randomly assigned to rFMS (n = 11), electroacupuncture pudinal nerve stimulation (EAPNS; n = 11), and control groups (n = 10). All groups received routine bladder function training. The S3 sacral nerve was stimulated at a frequency of 5 Hz, once per day for 4 consecutive weeks in the rFMS group. Electroacupuncture stimulation of the pudendal nerve was performed once daily for 4 weeks in the EAPNS group. The control group received bladder function retraining alone. After the 4-week treatment, there were significant improvements in all three groups (P < 0.05). Primary bladder sensation, maximum bladder volume, maximum bladder pressure, and residual urine were significantly higher in the rFMS group than in the other two groups (P < 0.05). Primary bladder sensation, maximum bladder volume, residual urine, and urinary leukocyte count were significantly different between the EAPNS and control groups (P < 0.05). The rFMS group had significantly lower scores in the self-rated anxiety scale and self-rated depression scale compared with those of the other two groups. The quality of life score significantly increased in all three groups. rFMS is conducive to the recovery of neurogenic function in patients with urinary retention. This study provides a scientific basis for the clinical application and promotion of rFMS.","PeriodicalId":93737,"journal":{"name":"Brain network and modulation","volume":"18 1","pages":"31 - 38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain network and modulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2773-2398.340142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Urinary retention is a serious complication of spinal cord injury. This study examined whether repetitive functional magnetic stimulation (rFMS) applied over the sacral nerve root affected bladder function or mood in patients with urinary retention after spinal cord injury. This single-center, case-control study included 32 patients with detrusor flaccid neurogenic bladder after spinal cord injury, who were randomly assigned to rFMS (n = 11), electroacupuncture pudinal nerve stimulation (EAPNS; n = 11), and control groups (n = 10). All groups received routine bladder function training. The S3 sacral nerve was stimulated at a frequency of 5 Hz, once per day for 4 consecutive weeks in the rFMS group. Electroacupuncture stimulation of the pudendal nerve was performed once daily for 4 weeks in the EAPNS group. The control group received bladder function retraining alone. After the 4-week treatment, there were significant improvements in all three groups (P < 0.05). Primary bladder sensation, maximum bladder volume, maximum bladder pressure, and residual urine were significantly higher in the rFMS group than in the other two groups (P < 0.05). Primary bladder sensation, maximum bladder volume, residual urine, and urinary leukocyte count were significantly different between the EAPNS and control groups (P < 0.05). The rFMS group had significantly lower scores in the self-rated anxiety scale and self-rated depression scale compared with those of the other two groups. The quality of life score significantly increased in all three groups. rFMS is conducive to the recovery of neurogenic function in patients with urinary retention. This study provides a scientific basis for the clinical application and promotion of rFMS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重复功能性磁刺激骶神经根治疗脊髓损伤后尿潴留的临床效果:病例对照研究
尿潴留是脊髓损伤的严重并发症。本研究探讨了骶神经根重复功能磁刺激(rFMS)是否影响脊髓损伤后尿潴留患者的膀胱功能或情绪。这项单中心病例对照研究纳入32例脊髓损伤后逼尿肌弛缓性神经源性膀胱患者,随机分为rFMS组(n = 11)、电针阴部神经刺激组(EAPNS;N = 11),对照组(N = 10)。各组均接受常规膀胱功能训练。rFMS组骶S3神经以5 Hz频率刺激,每天1次,连续4周。EAPNS组每日1次电刺激阴部神经,连续4周。对照组患者单独接受膀胱功能再训练。治疗4周后,三组患者均有显著改善(P < 0.05)。rFMS组原发性膀胱感觉、最大膀胱体积、最大膀胱压、残余尿明显高于其他两组(P < 0.05)。原发性膀胱感觉、最大膀胱容量、剩余尿量、尿白细胞计数在EAPNS组与对照组之间差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。rFMS组在焦虑自评量表和抑郁自评量表上的得分显著低于其他两组。三组患者的生活质量评分均显著提高。rFMS有利于尿潴留患者神经源性功能的恢复。本研究为rFMS的临床应用和推广提供了科学依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Resting-state electroencephalography delta and theta bands as compensatory oscillations in chronic neuropathic pain: a secondary data analysis. Deep brain stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder: current situation Neurophysiological isolation of individual rhythmic brain activity arising from auditory-speech load Is caffeine a potential therapeutic intervention for Alzheimer's disease? ARSITEKTUR NABATI : RESPON RUANG PASKA PANDEMI COVID-19 DI INDONESIA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1