Goal-directedness in embryonic development

Malcolm S. Steinberg
{"title":"Goal-directedness in embryonic development","authors":"Malcolm S. Steinberg","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1520-6602(1998)1:2<49::AID-INBI3>3.0.CO;2-Z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Self-organizing behavior is one of the most remarkable properties of regulative animal embryos. The reorganization of disarranged embryonic primordia to form an approximation of the “correct” structure by any number of abnormal pathways constitutes a form of goal-directed behavior. One might suppose that such anatomical “goals” are specified by genetic programs evolved through mutation and natural selection to produce useful structures. However, one might also ask the following questions: how can genes direct morphogenesis without specifying the pathways to be followed? How can genetic systems have evolved to specify the organization of the never-before-assembled structures reproducibly generated by abnormal tissue combinations? Experiments have shown that the layered structures generated in such experiments belong to the category of “inherently precise” machines, in which a specific pattern is generated with great precision by the constant repetition of a simple local behavior throughout the pattern-forming system. The organization characteristic of the chordate body plan—the “goal” of early development—also arises by very different developmental pathways in the various members of the phylum. Yet divergent evolution can hardly have altered the <i>mechanisms</i> governing gastrulation and neurulation while holding the <i>end results</i> essentially constant. Evidence suggests that the striking differences in these pathways may be understood less as fundamental alterations of morphogenetic mechanisms than as the physical consequences arising from heterochrony—differences in the times at which a shared set of underlying cellular changes are initiated.</p>","PeriodicalId":100679,"journal":{"name":"Integrative Biology: Issues, News, and Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6602(1998)1:2<49::AID-INBI3>3.0.CO;2-Z","citationCount":"44","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative Biology: Issues, News, and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291520-6602%281998%291%3A2%3C49%3A%3AAID-INBI3%3E3.0.CO%3B2-Z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44

Abstract

Self-organizing behavior is one of the most remarkable properties of regulative animal embryos. The reorganization of disarranged embryonic primordia to form an approximation of the “correct” structure by any number of abnormal pathways constitutes a form of goal-directed behavior. One might suppose that such anatomical “goals” are specified by genetic programs evolved through mutation and natural selection to produce useful structures. However, one might also ask the following questions: how can genes direct morphogenesis without specifying the pathways to be followed? How can genetic systems have evolved to specify the organization of the never-before-assembled structures reproducibly generated by abnormal tissue combinations? Experiments have shown that the layered structures generated in such experiments belong to the category of “inherently precise” machines, in which a specific pattern is generated with great precision by the constant repetition of a simple local behavior throughout the pattern-forming system. The organization characteristic of the chordate body plan—the “goal” of early development—also arises by very different developmental pathways in the various members of the phylum. Yet divergent evolution can hardly have altered the mechanisms governing gastrulation and neurulation while holding the end results essentially constant. Evidence suggests that the striking differences in these pathways may be understood less as fundamental alterations of morphogenetic mechanisms than as the physical consequences arising from heterochrony—differences in the times at which a shared set of underlying cellular changes are initiated.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胚胎发育中的目标定向
自组织行为是调节性动物胚胎最显著的特性之一。通过任意数量的异常通路,重组混乱的胚胎原基以形成近似的“正确”结构,构成了一种目标导向行为。有人可能会认为,这种解剖学上的“目标”是由基因程序指定的,这些程序通过突变和自然选择进化而产生有用的结构。然而,有人可能会问以下问题:基因如何在不指定要遵循的途径的情况下指导形态发生?遗传系统是如何进化到指定由异常组织组合可重复产生的从未组装过的结构的组织的?实验表明,在这种实验中产生的分层结构属于“固有精确”机器的范畴,在这种机器中,通过在整个模式形成系统中不断重复简单的局部行为,以极高的精度产生特定的模式。脊索动物身体结构的组织特征——早期发育的“目标”——在该门的不同成员中也通过非常不同的发育途径产生。然而,在保持最终结果基本不变的情况下,分化进化几乎不可能改变控制原肠胚形成和神经发育的机制。有证据表明,这些通路的显著差异可能不是被理解为形态发生机制的根本改变,而是被理解为由异时性引起的物理后果——一组共同的潜在细胞变化开始的时间差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nature in a bottle? Integrating behavior with neurobiology: Odor-mediated moth flight and olfactory discrimination by glomerular arrays We are sponges: Phylogenetic systematics is getting a tad silly Message in a bottle? Utility and limitations of recent ecological bottle experiments A new model for olfactory imprinting in salmon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1