Hate Speech and Incitement in Myanmar before and after the February 2021 Coup

IF 0.8 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Global Responsibility to Protect Pub Date : 2023-03-03 DOI:10.1163/1875984x-20230003
Noel M. Morada
{"title":"Hate Speech and Incitement in Myanmar before and after the February 2021 Coup","authors":"Noel M. Morada","doi":"10.1163/1875984x-20230003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis article examines the use of hate speech and incitement by perpetrators of violence and atrocities in Myanmar against vulnerable populations like the Rohingya community from the outbreak of communal conflict in Rakhine in 2012 to the post-February 2021 coup. It argues that there is a clear link between hate speech and incitement, on one hand, and the escalation of violent attacks against the Rohingya and other ethnic minorities in the country, which presaged the atrocities committed by security forces. It draws some implications for R2P and atrocities prevention from the Myanmar case study, which includes the flawed democratisation process initiated by the military and the manifest failure of both the usdp and nld governments to uphold their primary responsibility to protect vulnerable populations in the country. As well, the international community led by the United Nations and asean have both failed in their responsibility to respond in a timely and decisive manner to protect the Rohingya from genocide as well as the larger civilian population from the junta’s violent crackdown after the February 2021 coup.","PeriodicalId":38207,"journal":{"name":"Global Responsibility to Protect","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Responsibility to Protect","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/1875984x-20230003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article examines the use of hate speech and incitement by perpetrators of violence and atrocities in Myanmar against vulnerable populations like the Rohingya community from the outbreak of communal conflict in Rakhine in 2012 to the post-February 2021 coup. It argues that there is a clear link between hate speech and incitement, on one hand, and the escalation of violent attacks against the Rohingya and other ethnic minorities in the country, which presaged the atrocities committed by security forces. It draws some implications for R2P and atrocities prevention from the Myanmar case study, which includes the flawed democratisation process initiated by the military and the manifest failure of both the usdp and nld governments to uphold their primary responsibility to protect vulnerable populations in the country. As well, the international community led by the United Nations and asean have both failed in their responsibility to respond in a timely and decisive manner to protect the Rohingya from genocide as well as the larger civilian population from the junta’s violent crackdown after the February 2021 coup.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2021年2月政变前后缅甸的仇恨言论和煽动
本文考察了从2012年若开邦爆发种族冲突到2021年2月后的政变期间,缅甸暴力和暴行肇事者对罗兴亚社区等弱势群体使用仇恨言论和煽动。报告认为,一方面,仇恨言论和煽动与缅甸针对罗兴亚人和其他少数民族的暴力袭击升级之间存在明显联系,后者预示着安全部队犯下的暴行。它从缅甸的案例研究中得出了一些关于R2P和暴行预防的启示,其中包括军方发起的有缺陷的民主化进程,以及usdp和nld政府明显未能履行其保护该国弱势群体的主要责任。此外,以联合国和东盟为首的国际社会都未能及时和果断地作出反应,保护罗兴亚人免遭种族灭绝,保护更多的平民免遭军政府在2021年2月政变后的暴力镇压。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Responsibility to Protect
Global Responsibility to Protect Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
44.40%
发文量
42
期刊最新文献
The Responsibility to Protect: a Bibliography Residual Responsibility to Implement: the AU, the Constitutive Act, and the Responsibility to Protect Notes on Contributors China and Intervention at the UN Security Council: Reconciling Status, written by Courtney J. Fung Beyond the Responsibility to Protect in International Law: An Ethics of Irresponsibility, written by Angeliki Samara
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1