Comparative Efficiency of Various Disinfectants Used in the Cattle Farm

N. Starciuc, N. Osadci, I. Petcu, Nicolae Malancea, Xenia Bordos, Victor Ungureanu
{"title":"Comparative Efficiency of Various Disinfectants Used in the Cattle Farm","authors":"N. Starciuc, N. Osadci, I. Petcu, Nicolae Malancea, Xenia Bordos, Victor Ungureanu","doi":"10.2478/alife-2018-0076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The investigations were aimed to establish the comparative efficiency of four disinfectants (Aquadez, Ecocide S, Virocide and Na OH) used for the disinfection of cattle farm of State Agrarian University of Moldova. According to the classical methodology, the disinfectants have been used in concentrations which were recommended by the producers. Following this, lavages were collected from different supports and equipment of the cattle farm before sparing of the disinfectants and one hour after the contact of the disinfectants with the substrates. In this context samples were taken from places as the feeding space for animals and the rest area, cows’ milking rooms and the milk collection rooms. Afterwards, the samples have been inseminated in laboratory conditions for establishing the afterwards disinfecting effect on the farm. As a result, the microbiological investigation demonstrated that concentrations which were recommended by the producers and double concentrations of disinfectants don’t have satisfactory 100% of the anti-microbial and antifungal effect. For all disinfected places with the mentioned disinfectants colonies of microorganisms grew on nutrient media, especially bacterial forms as Streptococcus, Staphylococcus and microscopic fungal. Following comparisons, Ecocide S 3% and Na OH 3% had a higher efficiency than Aquadez 3%. The after application effect of Aquadez 3% established the presence of Salmonella, E. coli colonies grown on nutrient media as well as, Streptococcus and microscopic fungal.","PeriodicalId":6413,"journal":{"name":"“Agriculture for Life, Life for Agriculture” Conference Proceedings","volume":"28 1","pages":"485 - 489"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"“Agriculture for Life, Life for Agriculture” Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/alife-2018-0076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The investigations were aimed to establish the comparative efficiency of four disinfectants (Aquadez, Ecocide S, Virocide and Na OH) used for the disinfection of cattle farm of State Agrarian University of Moldova. According to the classical methodology, the disinfectants have been used in concentrations which were recommended by the producers. Following this, lavages were collected from different supports and equipment of the cattle farm before sparing of the disinfectants and one hour after the contact of the disinfectants with the substrates. In this context samples were taken from places as the feeding space for animals and the rest area, cows’ milking rooms and the milk collection rooms. Afterwards, the samples have been inseminated in laboratory conditions for establishing the afterwards disinfecting effect on the farm. As a result, the microbiological investigation demonstrated that concentrations which were recommended by the producers and double concentrations of disinfectants don’t have satisfactory 100% of the anti-microbial and antifungal effect. For all disinfected places with the mentioned disinfectants colonies of microorganisms grew on nutrient media, especially bacterial forms as Streptococcus, Staphylococcus and microscopic fungal. Following comparisons, Ecocide S 3% and Na OH 3% had a higher efficiency than Aquadez 3%. The after application effect of Aquadez 3% established the presence of Salmonella, E. coli colonies grown on nutrient media as well as, Streptococcus and microscopic fungal.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牛场各种消毒剂使用效率的比较
摘要本研究旨在探讨四种消毒剂(Aquadez、Ecocide S、Virocide和Na OH)在摩尔多瓦国立农业大学牛场的消毒效果。根据传统的方法,消毒剂的使用浓度是生产者建议的。随后,在保留消毒剂之前和消毒剂与基质接触后1小时,从牛场的不同支架和设备上收集洗液。在这种情况下,样本取自动物喂养空间和休息区,奶牛挤奶室和收集牛奶的房间。然后,在实验室条件下对样品进行人工授精,以确定农场的事后消毒效果。结果,微生物学调查表明,生产厂家推荐浓度和双浓度消毒剂不能达到100%的抑菌抑菌效果。在所有用上述消毒剂消毒的地方,微生物菌落在营养培养基上生长,特别是细菌形式,如链球菌、葡萄球菌和微观真菌。经过比较,Ecocide S 3%和naoh 3%的效率高于Aquadez 3%。3% Aquadez施用后的效果确定了在营养培养基上生长的沙门氏菌、大肠杆菌菌落以及链球菌和微生物真菌的存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Experimental Rearing of the Golden Gray Mullet Liza Aurata (Risso, 1810) in a Recirculating System at the Black Sea Еpidemiological Data on Lead Tissue Concentration in Game Birds Induced by Lead Pellets Assessment of Micro and Macro Nutrients Contents in the Turkish Faba Bean Germplasm Effect of Trifluralin, Zero-Valent Iron and Magnetite Nanoparticles on Growth of Micromycetes Sunflower Varieties and Hybrids Registered for Cultivation in Romania in the Last Century
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1