The Perpetual Object of Regulation: Privacy As Pacification

IF 0.7 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Socialist Studies Pub Date : 2013-12-12 DOI:10.18740/S4201V
A. Henry
{"title":"The Perpetual Object of Regulation: Privacy As Pacification","authors":"A. Henry","doi":"10.18740/S4201V","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article theorizes the relationship of privacy to capital and projects of security and, in doing so, situates privacy in context to pacification. In particular, the article provides an interrogation of the contradictory structuring of privacy as both an object threatened by security and the role of privacy as a means to resist or limit projects of security. Through an analysis of Thomas Hobbes’ writings, this contradictory dual-deployment of privacy is unseated to reveal that far from challenging security, privacy has historically been presupposed and structured by security projects. Moreover, by acclimatizing us to our existence as atomized individuals, alienated from our collective social power, privacy in fact pacifies us. This process is explored through an examination of the Passenger Flight List agreement (PNR) between the United States and EU member states. The article concludes with a brief discussion of the implications of our reliance on privacy has for challenging the logics of security and pacification, especially with the emergent technology of Drones.","PeriodicalId":29667,"journal":{"name":"Socialist Studies","volume":"96 9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socialist Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18740/S4201V","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This article theorizes the relationship of privacy to capital and projects of security and, in doing so, situates privacy in context to pacification. In particular, the article provides an interrogation of the contradictory structuring of privacy as both an object threatened by security and the role of privacy as a means to resist or limit projects of security. Through an analysis of Thomas Hobbes’ writings, this contradictory dual-deployment of privacy is unseated to reveal that far from challenging security, privacy has historically been presupposed and structured by security projects. Moreover, by acclimatizing us to our existence as atomized individuals, alienated from our collective social power, privacy in fact pacifies us. This process is explored through an examination of the Passenger Flight List agreement (PNR) between the United States and EU member states. The article concludes with a brief discussion of the implications of our reliance on privacy has for challenging the logics of security and pacification, especially with the emergent technology of Drones.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
监管的永恒目标:作为安抚的隐私
本文将隐私与资本和安全项目的关系理论化,并在此过程中,将隐私置于绥靖的背景下。特别是,本文对隐私作为安全威胁的对象和隐私作为抵制或限制安全项目的手段的作用的矛盾结构进行了质疑。通过对托马斯·霍布斯著作的分析,这种对隐私的矛盾的双重部署被推翻,揭示出隐私远没有挑战安全,在历史上,隐私一直是由安全项目预设和构建的。此外,通过使我们适应我们作为原子化的个体的存在,远离我们的集体社会权力,隐私实际上安抚了我们。这一过程是通过对美国和欧盟成员国之间的旅客航班名单协议(PNR)的审查来探讨的。文章最后简要讨论了我们对隐私的依赖对挑战安全和和平逻辑的影响,特别是随着无人机的新兴技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Auntie Dialogues Reflections on the Struggle Against the Free Trade Agreement (FTA), Three Decades On Canada's National Questions, Free Trade and the Left Reflections on the Struggle Against the Canada-US Free Trade Agreement (TFA), 30 Years Later C.B. Macpherson on Marxism and the Eighties
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1