In-hospital Outcomes of Aspiration Pneumonia Hospitalizations With Acute Heart Failure: A Nationwide Analysis

A. Jain, Maharshi Raval, S. Srikanth, Karnav Modi, Athul Raj Raju, M. Garg, R. Doshi, R. Desai
{"title":"In-hospital Outcomes of Aspiration Pneumonia Hospitalizations With Acute Heart Failure: A Nationwide Analysis","authors":"A. Jain, Maharshi Raval, S. Srikanth, Karnav Modi, Athul Raj Raju, M. Garg, R. Doshi, R. Desai","doi":"10.36628/ijhf.2023.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objectives There is a paucity of data regarding the impact of acute heart failure (AHF) on the outcomes of aspiration pneumonia (AP). Methods Using National Inpatient Sample datasets (2016 to 2019), we identified admissions for AP with AHF vs. without AHF using relevant International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. We compared the demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes between the two groups. Results Out of the 121,097,410 weighted adult hospitalizations, 488,260 had AP, of which 13.25% (n=64,675) had AHF. The AHF cohort consisted predominantly of the elderly (mean age 80.4 vs. 71.1 years), females (47.8% vs. 42.2%), and whites (81.6% vs. 78.5%) than non-AHF cohort (all p<0.001). Complicated diabetes and hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity, chronic pulmonary disease, and prior myocardial infarction were more frequent in AHF than in the non-AHF cohort. AP-AHF cohort had similar adjusted odds of all-cause mortality (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78–1.03; p=0.122), acute respiratory failure (AOR, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.96–1.13; p=0.379), but higher adjusted odds of cardiogenic shock (AOR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.30–3.64; p=0.003), and use of mechanical ventilation (MV) (AOR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.17–1.56; p<0.001) compared to AP only cohort. AP-AHF cohort more frequently required longer durations of MV and hospital stays with a higher mean cost of the stay. Conclusions Our study from a nationally representative database demonstrates an increased morbidity burden, worsened complications, and higher hospital resource utilization, although a similar risk of all-cause mortality in AP patients with AHF vs. no AHF.","PeriodicalId":14058,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Heart Failure","volume":"64 1","pages":"191 - 200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36628/ijhf.2023.0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background and Objectives There is a paucity of data regarding the impact of acute heart failure (AHF) on the outcomes of aspiration pneumonia (AP). Methods Using National Inpatient Sample datasets (2016 to 2019), we identified admissions for AP with AHF vs. without AHF using relevant International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. We compared the demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes between the two groups. Results Out of the 121,097,410 weighted adult hospitalizations, 488,260 had AP, of which 13.25% (n=64,675) had AHF. The AHF cohort consisted predominantly of the elderly (mean age 80.4 vs. 71.1 years), females (47.8% vs. 42.2%), and whites (81.6% vs. 78.5%) than non-AHF cohort (all p<0.001). Complicated diabetes and hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity, chronic pulmonary disease, and prior myocardial infarction were more frequent in AHF than in the non-AHF cohort. AP-AHF cohort had similar adjusted odds of all-cause mortality (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78–1.03; p=0.122), acute respiratory failure (AOR, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.96–1.13; p=0.379), but higher adjusted odds of cardiogenic shock (AOR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.30–3.64; p=0.003), and use of mechanical ventilation (MV) (AOR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.17–1.56; p<0.001) compared to AP only cohort. AP-AHF cohort more frequently required longer durations of MV and hospital stays with a higher mean cost of the stay. Conclusions Our study from a nationally representative database demonstrates an increased morbidity burden, worsened complications, and higher hospital resource utilization, although a similar risk of all-cause mortality in AP patients with AHF vs. no AHF.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
吸入性肺炎住院合并急性心力衰竭的住院结果:一项全国性分析
背景和目的关于急性心力衰竭(AHF)对吸入性肺炎(AP)结局的影响的数据缺乏。方法使用国家住院患者样本数据集(2016年至2019年),我们使用相关的国际疾病分类第十次修订代码确定合并AHF和未合并AHF的AP入院情况。我们比较了两组的人口统计学、合并症和结果。结果在121,097,410名加权成人住院患者中,488,260人患有AP,其中13.25% (n=64,675)患有AHF。与非AHF队列相比,AHF队列主要由老年人(平均年龄80.4比71.1岁)、女性(47.8%比42.2%)和白人(81.6%比78.5%)组成(均p<0.001)。合并糖尿病和高血压、血脂异常、肥胖、慢性肺部疾病和既往心肌梗死在AHF组中比在非AHF组中更常见。AP-AHF队列的全因死亡率校正后的优势相似(校正优势比[AOR], 0.9;95%置信区间[CI], 0.78-1.03;p=0.122),急性呼吸衰竭(AOR, 1.0;95% ci, 0.96-1.13;p=0.379),但心源性休克的校正几率较高(AOR, 2.2;95% ci, 1.30-3.64;p=0.003),机械通气使用(MV) (AOR, 1.3;95% ci, 1.17-1.56;p<0.001)。AP-AHF队列通常需要更长时间的MV和住院时间,平均住院费用较高。结论:我们从全国代表性数据库中进行的研究表明,尽管合并AHF的AP患者与未合并AHF的AP患者的全因死亡率风险相似,但发病率负担增加,并发症恶化,医院资源利用率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Understanding the Epidemiologic Profile and Predictors of Readmission of Heart Failure: Unveiling Opportunities for Improved Care. In-hospital Outcomes of Aspiration Pneumonia Hospitalizations With Acute Heart Failure: A Nationwide Analysis Korean Society of Heart Failure Guidelines for the Management of Heart Failure: Management of the Underlying Etiologies and Comorbidities of Heart Failure. Korean Society of Heart Failure Guidelines for the Management of Heart Failure: Advanced and Acute Heart Failure. Association of Blood Pressure and Prognosis of Heart Failure With Systolic Dysfunction: A Myth That Should Be Solved.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1