Editorial--How Important Are Inhaler Technique Errors?

B. Bender
{"title":"Editorial--How Important Are Inhaler Technique Errors?","authors":"B. Bender","doi":"10.15326/jcopdf.6.3.2019.0142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Treatment of respiratory diseases, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma, depends primarily on inhaled medications. Because of the complexity of inhaled medication delivery, patients’ mastery of inhalers presents a major challenge to these treatments. Further, the skill requirements vary across medication devices, including metered-dose inhalers (MDIs), breath-activated MDIs, soft-mist inhalers, dry-powder inhalers (DPIs), and nebulizers, adding further potential confusion for both prescribers and patients. A large body of literature has documented the frequency of patient inhaler errors and the correlation of these with worsening outcomes1 accounting for nearly $900 million in direct and indirect costs.2 The manuscript by Cho-Reyes et al in this issue of the Journal of the COPD Foundation adds to this literature, combining a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ten previously published reports including 1360 patients revealed that 86.7% of patients made at least 1 inhalation technique error, and that 76.8% of patients made multiple errors. These results confirm a previous report of 54 studies showing that 86.8% of patients using an MDI and 60.9% of patients using a DPI made at least 1 error.3","PeriodicalId":10249,"journal":{"name":"Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases","volume":"31 1","pages":"203-205"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.6.3.2019.0142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Treatment of respiratory diseases, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma, depends primarily on inhaled medications. Because of the complexity of inhaled medication delivery, patients’ mastery of inhalers presents a major challenge to these treatments. Further, the skill requirements vary across medication devices, including metered-dose inhalers (MDIs), breath-activated MDIs, soft-mist inhalers, dry-powder inhalers (DPIs), and nebulizers, adding further potential confusion for both prescribers and patients. A large body of literature has documented the frequency of patient inhaler errors and the correlation of these with worsening outcomes1 accounting for nearly $900 million in direct and indirect costs.2 The manuscript by Cho-Reyes et al in this issue of the Journal of the COPD Foundation adds to this literature, combining a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ten previously published reports including 1360 patients revealed that 86.7% of patients made at least 1 inhalation technique error, and that 76.8% of patients made multiple errors. These results confirm a previous report of 54 studies showing that 86.8% of patients using an MDI and 60.9% of patients using a DPI made at least 1 error.3
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社论——吸入器技术错误有多重要?
呼吸系统疾病,包括慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)和哮喘的治疗主要依赖于吸入药物。由于吸入药物输送的复杂性,患者对吸入器的掌握对这些治疗提出了重大挑战。此外,不同的药物设备,包括计量吸入器(MDIs)、呼吸激活MDIs、软雾吸入器、干粉吸入器(dpi)和雾化器,对处方者和患者的技能要求也不同,这进一步增加了潜在的混淆。大量文献记录了患者吸入器错误的频率以及这些错误与恶化结果的相关性,造成了近9亿美元的直接和间接损失Cho-Reyes等人在本期《慢性阻塞性肺病基金会杂志》上发表的手稿,结合系统回顾和荟萃分析,为这一文献增添了新的内容。先前发表的10份报告,包括1360例患者,显示86.7%的患者至少犯了一次吸入技术错误,76.8%的患者犯了多次错误。这些结果证实了先前54项研究的报告,即86.8%的MDI患者和60.9%的DPI患者至少犯1个错误
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Blood Eosinophil Count Stability and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in a High Endemic Area of Parasitic Infection: A Prospective Study. Sexual Orientation Health Disparities in Chronic Respiratory Disorders. COPD: Iron Deficiency and Clinical Characteristics in Patients With and Without Chronic Respiratory Failure. Impact of Bronchiectasis on COPD Severity and Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency as a Risk Factor in Individuals with a Heavy Smoking History. Impact of COVID-19 on Hospital Admissions, Health Status, and Behavioral Changes of Patients with COPD.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1