Uneasy bedfellows? Fusing participatory and psychosocial principles in research with youth workers and young people

IF 0.2 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Psychosocial Studies Pub Date : 2019-10-01 DOI:10.1332/204378919x15674407381128
P. Harris
{"title":"Uneasy bedfellows? Fusing participatory and psychosocial principles in research with youth workers and young people","authors":"P. Harris","doi":"10.1332/204378919x15674407381128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article charts an attempt to fuse two arguably incompatible formulations of social research; one rooted in a commitment to democratic, participatory practice and the other rooted in a psychosocial epistemological frame. After setting out the broad precepts of the two methodological\n approaches, the article explores some theoretical and practical tensions that surfaced during a doctoral criminological study examining the desistance-promoting potential of relationships between male youth workers and young men involved in violence. I show how the professional context in\n which the study was conducted (youth work) afforded the opportunity to work with participants while also retaining a psychosocial epistemological and analytic frame. The article concludes that while the two approaches are likely to remain ‘uneasy bedfellows’, more researchers\n in the youth work field might consider adopting a psychosocial standpoint as a means of keeping in sight both the psychic and the social forces imbricated in young people’s lives and within their relationships with youth professionals.","PeriodicalId":29710,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosocial Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosocial Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/204378919x15674407381128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article charts an attempt to fuse two arguably incompatible formulations of social research; one rooted in a commitment to democratic, participatory practice and the other rooted in a psychosocial epistemological frame. After setting out the broad precepts of the two methodological approaches, the article explores some theoretical and practical tensions that surfaced during a doctoral criminological study examining the desistance-promoting potential of relationships between male youth workers and young men involved in violence. I show how the professional context in which the study was conducted (youth work) afforded the opportunity to work with participants while also retaining a psychosocial epistemological and analytic frame. The article concludes that while the two approaches are likely to remain ‘uneasy bedfellows’, more researchers in the youth work field might consider adopting a psychosocial standpoint as a means of keeping in sight both the psychic and the social forces imbricated in young people’s lives and within their relationships with youth professionals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同床异梦吗?在青年工作者和年轻人的研究中融合参与性和社会心理原则
本文试图融合两种可能不相容的社会研究模式;一个植根于对民主,参与性实践的承诺,另一个植根于社会心理认识论框架。在阐述了这两种方法的广泛原则之后,文章探讨了在一项犯罪学博士研究中出现的一些理论和实践上的紧张关系,该研究考察了男性青年工作者和参与暴力的年轻男性之间的关系促进停止的潜力。我展示了研究进行的专业背景(青年工作)如何提供与参与者一起工作的机会,同时也保留了社会心理认识论和分析框架。这篇文章的结论是,虽然这两种方法可能仍然是“不稳定的同床共枕”,但更多的青年工作领域的研究人员可能会考虑采用社会心理的观点,作为一种手段,以保持对年轻人生活中的精神和社会力量的关注,以及他们与青年专业人员的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Can religion be rescued in the 21st century? On Erich Fromm’s religious humanism in an age of authoritarian populism Racial trauma as an unlaid ghost of empire The haunting melody of loss in the racist imagination Racism, hatred and melancholic curiosity Stoking hate: configuring loss in explanations of racially aggravated crime
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1