Quantitative assessment of the sagittal and coronal balance of the axial skeleton using 3D motion capture

Q3 Medicine Genij Ortopedii Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.18019/1028-4427-2023-29-3-307-315
T. Dolganova, A. Aksenov, I. Garipov, O. M. Sergeenko, K. A. Diachkov, I.D. Cherepanov, D. Dolganov
{"title":"Quantitative assessment of the sagittal and coronal balance of the axial skeleton using 3D motion capture","authors":"T. Dolganova, A. Aksenov, I. Garipov, O. M. Sergeenko, K. A. Diachkov, I.D. Cherepanov, D. Dolganov","doi":"10.18019/1028-4427-2023-29-3-307-315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Sagittal and coronal balance of the body cannot be evaluated with the modern programs for musculoskeletal assessment using 3D motion capture and additional software operations are required for the measurements. The objective was to review information capacity and comparability of the quantitative assessments of the dynamic axial balance of the body using radiography and 3D gait analysis. Material and methods Comparative analysis of the information capacity of sagittal and coronal balance using radiographs and 3D gait analysis was performed in adolescents without orthopedic pathology (n = 12); untreated patients with idiopathic scoliosis (n = 53); patients with degenerative disorders of the spine (n = 15). Results Axial balance identified with 3D gait analysis showed dynamic measurements and depended on the posture during recording. There were no significant differences in the balance measurements in the samples in comparison with radiological findings with the medians being almost identical. Correlations between the balances were statistically significant in patients with degenerative disorders of the spine without clinical manifestations and in patients with idiopathic scoliosis without pain, and were not significant in patients with clinical and antalgic manifestations of vertebral pathology. Discussion Absence of statistically significant differences and close central trends in the samples indicated the comparability of the measurements in general population due to sagittal and coronal balance measured in the same patients, at different time points, in different postures and by different methods. However, significant differences in variation and a statistically significant effect of antalgic manifestations on the strength of correlation suggested that the dynamic balance measured with 3D gait analysis were more sensitive and informative to pathogenetic symptoms. Conclusions Algorithms for measurements of the axial balance using 3D gait analysis were comparable with radiographic findings and were much more informative and sensitive to antalgic manifestations of spinal pathology.","PeriodicalId":37426,"journal":{"name":"Genij Ortopedii","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genij Ortopedii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18019/1028-4427-2023-29-3-307-315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Sagittal and coronal balance of the body cannot be evaluated with the modern programs for musculoskeletal assessment using 3D motion capture and additional software operations are required for the measurements. The objective was to review information capacity and comparability of the quantitative assessments of the dynamic axial balance of the body using radiography and 3D gait analysis. Material and methods Comparative analysis of the information capacity of sagittal and coronal balance using radiographs and 3D gait analysis was performed in adolescents without orthopedic pathology (n = 12); untreated patients with idiopathic scoliosis (n = 53); patients with degenerative disorders of the spine (n = 15). Results Axial balance identified with 3D gait analysis showed dynamic measurements and depended on the posture during recording. There were no significant differences in the balance measurements in the samples in comparison with radiological findings with the medians being almost identical. Correlations between the balances were statistically significant in patients with degenerative disorders of the spine without clinical manifestations and in patients with idiopathic scoliosis without pain, and were not significant in patients with clinical and antalgic manifestations of vertebral pathology. Discussion Absence of statistically significant differences and close central trends in the samples indicated the comparability of the measurements in general population due to sagittal and coronal balance measured in the same patients, at different time points, in different postures and by different methods. However, significant differences in variation and a statistically significant effect of antalgic manifestations on the strength of correlation suggested that the dynamic balance measured with 3D gait analysis were more sensitive and informative to pathogenetic symptoms. Conclusions Algorithms for measurements of the axial balance using 3D gait analysis were comparable with radiographic findings and were much more informative and sensitive to antalgic manifestations of spinal pathology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用三维运动捕捉定量评估轴向骨骼矢状面和冠状面平衡
身体的矢状面和冠状面平衡不能用使用3D运动捕捉的现代肌肉骨骼评估程序来评估,并且需要额外的软件操作来进行测量。目的是回顾信息容量和可比性的定量评估使用x线摄影和三维步态分析的身体动态轴向平衡。材料与方法对未患骨科疾病的青少年(n = 12)进行矢状面和冠状面平衡的x线信息容量与三维步态分析的比较分析;未经治疗的特发性脊柱侧凸患者(n = 53);脊柱退行性疾病患者(n = 15)。结果通过三维步态分析确定的轴向平衡是动态测量的,并且在记录过程中依赖于姿势。与放射学结果相比,样品中的平衡测量值没有显着差异,中位数几乎相同。在无临床表现的脊柱退行性疾病患者和无疼痛的特发性脊柱侧凸患者中,平衡值的相关性有统计学意义,而在有椎体病理临床和镇痛表现的患者中,平衡值的相关性无统计学意义。样本中没有统计学上的显著差异和接近的中心趋势表明,在一般人群中,由于在同一患者中,在不同时间点,不同姿势和不同方法测量的矢状面和冠状面平衡,测量结果具有可比性。然而,差异的显著性和镇痛表现对相关强度的统计学显著影响表明,用3D步态分析测量的动态平衡对发病症状更敏感,信息更丰富。结论:使用3D步态分析测量轴向平衡的算法与x线检查结果相当,并且对脊柱病理的疼痛表现更敏感,信息更丰富。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Genij Ortopedii
Genij Ortopedii Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal’s main goal is to contribute to the development of the contemporary medical science via presentation of fundamental and applied original scientific studies to the scientific and practical medical community that would widen and deepen the understanding of the most important problems in the field of traumatology, orthopaedics, and related specialties. Our journal provides a direct open access to its content which is based on the principle that the open access option promotes global exchange of knowledge and experience. Journal’s strategy: -Development of the journal as a scientific platform for researchers, doctors, post-graduates and residents -Attraction of highly-cited authors to publish their studies -Selection of manuscripts of scientific interest for readers that will impact on journal citation index in RINC -Increase in the portion of publications submitted by foreign authors and studies conducted in association with foreign scientists; growth of citations in the journals that are included into global systems of indexing and reputable databases -Improvement of the Journal’s web site in two languages for a greater accessibility by authors and readers -Introduction of the Journal into global indexing systems
期刊最新文献
Evolution of the first metatarsophalangeal joint replacement Orthopaedic complications of hemiparetic forms of cerebral palsy: problems of the lower extremities (literature review) Evolution of tactical approaches to eliminating limb length discrepancy Current state of the treatment problem in the patients with elbow joint contractures due to ossification Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae in children and adolescents (literature review, illustrated with clinical observations)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1