Introduction to the special issue

IF 0.5 Q4 COMMUNICATION Argumentation and Advocacy Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI:10.1080/10511431.2022.2138177
J. Eckstein, Harry Weger
{"title":"Introduction to the special issue","authors":"J. Eckstein, Harry Weger","doi":"10.1080/10511431.2022.2138177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conceptualizing, theorizing, researching, and practicing argumentation transcends disciplinary boundaries and national borders. As a field, the contemporary study of argumentation emerged through a network of shared objects, questions, journals, conferences, and concerns that coalesced around the ordinary practice of arguing. Although scholarship is global, the embeddedness of all social practices, including research, indicate that the location of these activities matters. When we think of the places of our examples, case studies, and our data sets, where the argument happens has an influence upon how we think of argumentation. Culturally situated practices shape arguers’ behavior, scholars’ study of argumentation, how argumentation is taught, and even what it means for something to count as an argument in the first place. The exchange of ideas between scholars has resulted in expanded theories, nuanced descriptions, and new normative frameworks. The intercultural dialogue gives us more tools to solve complex social, political, environmental, economic, and interpersonal problems. This exchange did not just happen in texts but led to the for-mulation of an entire circuit of major conferences, summer schools, workshops, and exchanges. These include but are not limited to the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, the European Society for Argumentation, European Conference for Argumentation, the Alta Conference on Argumentation, and the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation. These networks and institutions provide important sites for developing and supporting individual scholarship as well as entire schools of thought. They nurtured young scholars, ensured that schools of thought were systematically developed, and facilitated the pollination of ideas across different institutions. In this special issue, we present essays that focus spe-cifically on the traditions, customs, and cultural institutions of the Americas. Opening up new circuitry between places, spaces, and histories presents opportunities for knowledge production and new networked connections. We live in precarious times as we navigate a climate disaster","PeriodicalId":29934,"journal":{"name":"Argumentation and Advocacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Argumentation and Advocacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10511431.2022.2138177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conceptualizing, theorizing, researching, and practicing argumentation transcends disciplinary boundaries and national borders. As a field, the contemporary study of argumentation emerged through a network of shared objects, questions, journals, conferences, and concerns that coalesced around the ordinary practice of arguing. Although scholarship is global, the embeddedness of all social practices, including research, indicate that the location of these activities matters. When we think of the places of our examples, case studies, and our data sets, where the argument happens has an influence upon how we think of argumentation. Culturally situated practices shape arguers’ behavior, scholars’ study of argumentation, how argumentation is taught, and even what it means for something to count as an argument in the first place. The exchange of ideas between scholars has resulted in expanded theories, nuanced descriptions, and new normative frameworks. The intercultural dialogue gives us more tools to solve complex social, political, environmental, economic, and interpersonal problems. This exchange did not just happen in texts but led to the for-mulation of an entire circuit of major conferences, summer schools, workshops, and exchanges. These include but are not limited to the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, the European Society for Argumentation, European Conference for Argumentation, the Alta Conference on Argumentation, and the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation. These networks and institutions provide important sites for developing and supporting individual scholarship as well as entire schools of thought. They nurtured young scholars, ensured that schools of thought were systematically developed, and facilitated the pollination of ideas across different institutions. In this special issue, we present essays that focus spe-cifically on the traditions, customs, and cultural institutions of the Americas. Opening up new circuitry between places, spaces, and histories presents opportunities for knowledge production and new networked connections. We live in precarious times as we navigate a climate disaster
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特刊简介
概念化、理论化、研究和实践论证超越了学科边界和国界。作为一个领域,当代论证研究是通过一个由共同的对象、问题、期刊、会议和关注组成的网络出现的,这些网络围绕着普通的论证实践。虽然学术研究是全球性的,但包括研究在内的所有社会实践的嵌入性表明,这些活动的地点很重要。当我们想到我们的例子、案例研究和数据集的位置时,争论发生的地方会影响我们对辩论的看法。文化背景下的实践塑造了辩论者的行为,学者们对辩论的研究,如何教授辩论,甚至是一开始被认为是辩论的东西意味着什么。学者之间的思想交流产生了扩展的理论、细致入微的描述和新的规范框架。跨文化对话为我们解决复杂的社会、政治、环境、经济和人际问题提供了更多的工具。这种交流不仅发生在文本中,而且导致了一系列大型会议、暑期学校、讲习班和交流的形成。这些组织包括但不限于国际论证研究学会、欧洲论证学会、欧洲论证会议、阿尔塔论证会议和安大略论证研究学会。这些网络和机构为发展和支持个人学术以及整个思想流派提供了重要的场所。他们培养了年轻的学者,确保了思想流派的系统发展,并促进了不同机构之间思想的传播。在这一期特刊中,我们将介绍一些文章,重点介绍美洲的传统、习俗和文化制度。在地点、空间和历史之间开辟新的线路,为知识生产和新的网络连接提供了机会。我们生活在一个不稳定的时代,我们正在应对气候灾难
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Cicero’s maledicta : the darker side of Cicero’s arguments The impact of normative argument quality variations on claim acceptance: empirical evidence from the US and the UK Can high school competitive debating facilitate political participation? The role of political knowledge and identification with a politically active group Nonverbal communication as argumentation: the case of political television debates The unnerved and unhoused: a rhetorical analysis of save Austin now’s campaign to disband unhoused individuals from Austin, Texas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1