Health seeking behaviour and traditional management practices for symptoms of Onchocerciasis by residents of the Hawal River Valley, Nigeria

I. Okoye
{"title":"Health seeking behaviour and traditional management practices for symptoms of Onchocerciasis by residents of the Hawal River Valley, Nigeria","authors":"I. Okoye","doi":"10.4314/ARI.V4I3.48694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The health-care seeking behaviour of onchocerciasis infected residents of the Hawal River Valley; North Eastern Nigeria was investigated among 423 infected subjects using structured questionnaires, Focus Group Discussions and In-depth studies. The objectives of the investigations were to determine the preferred forms of treatment and management practices for different symptoms of onchocerciasis. Result obtained showed that overall; self-medication (27.2%) was the most preferred form of treatment, followed by traditional healing or herbal treatment (25.1%) while visits to hospitals/clinics (12.8%) were the least preferred. %). The differences between the number of people seeking the various types of treatment was found statistically significant (p>0.05).  Generally, the form of treatment sought depended on the particular symptoms.  For example, while 65.0% of those having musculoskeletal pains; 40.2% of those having pruritis and 34.8% of the visually impaired sought treatment from the drug hawkers/drug stores; none of those with LS, nodules, hydrocoele/elephantiasis and blindness patronised them. The symptoms for which treatment was sought most were musculoskeletal pains (46.7%) and pruritis (38.0%) and those for which least treatment were sought were leopard skin (1.3%) and blindness (1.3%). The result of the Focus Group Discussion (FGD) showed that screening of doors and windows was the most popular method (45.3%) of vector (Simulium) control. Personal hygiene (43.0%) and steam-bath (31.3%) were the most popular ways of prevention and management of pruritis (craw-craw) respectively while no traditional medication was found potent for the treatment or reversal of severe visual lesion and blindness.","PeriodicalId":7872,"journal":{"name":"Animal Research International","volume":"98 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ARI.V4I3.48694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The health-care seeking behaviour of onchocerciasis infected residents of the Hawal River Valley; North Eastern Nigeria was investigated among 423 infected subjects using structured questionnaires, Focus Group Discussions and In-depth studies. The objectives of the investigations were to determine the preferred forms of treatment and management practices for different symptoms of onchocerciasis. Result obtained showed that overall; self-medication (27.2%) was the most preferred form of treatment, followed by traditional healing or herbal treatment (25.1%) while visits to hospitals/clinics (12.8%) were the least preferred. %). The differences between the number of people seeking the various types of treatment was found statistically significant (p>0.05).  Generally, the form of treatment sought depended on the particular symptoms.  For example, while 65.0% of those having musculoskeletal pains; 40.2% of those having pruritis and 34.8% of the visually impaired sought treatment from the drug hawkers/drug stores; none of those with LS, nodules, hydrocoele/elephantiasis and blindness patronised them. The symptoms for which treatment was sought most were musculoskeletal pains (46.7%) and pruritis (38.0%) and those for which least treatment were sought were leopard skin (1.3%) and blindness (1.3%). The result of the Focus Group Discussion (FGD) showed that screening of doors and windows was the most popular method (45.3%) of vector (Simulium) control. Personal hygiene (43.0%) and steam-bath (31.3%) were the most popular ways of prevention and management of pruritis (craw-craw) respectively while no traditional medication was found potent for the treatment or reversal of severe visual lesion and blindness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚哈瓦尔河谷居民的求医行为和盘尾丝虫病症状的传统管理做法
哈瓦尔河谷感染盘尾丝虫病的居民求医行为采用结构化问卷、焦点小组讨论和深入研究对尼日利亚东北部的423名感染者进行了调查。调查的目的是确定盘尾丝虫病不同症状的首选治疗形式和管理方法。结果表明:总体上;自我药疗(27.2%)是最受欢迎的治疗方式,其次是传统治疗或草药治疗(25.1%),而去医院/诊所(12.8%)是最不受欢迎的治疗方式。%)。寻求不同类型治疗的人数差异有统计学意义(p>0.05)。一般来说,所寻求的治疗形式取决于具体的症状。例如,65.0%的肌肉骨骼疼痛患者;40.2%的瘙痒症患者及34.8%的视障人士曾到小贩/药房求诊;而那些患有LS、结节、腔内积水/象皮病和失明的人则没有光顾他们。寻求治疗最多的症状是肌肉骨骼痛(46.7%)和瘙痒(38.0%),寻求治疗最少的症状是豹皮(1.3%)和失明(1.3%)。焦点小组讨论(FGD)结果显示,屏蔽门窗是最流行的媒介(模拟)控制方法(45.3%)。个人卫生(43.0%)和蒸汽浴(31.3%)分别是预防和管理瘙痒(瘙痒)最流行的方法,而没有发现传统药物对严重视力损害和失明的治疗或逆转有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gene therapy, physiological applications, problems and prospects - a review Determination of the concentration of some mineral elements and pollen spectra of Apis mellifera L. honeys from different locations in Nigeria Comparative study of the bacterial load and species diversity in the African catfish ( Clarias gariepinus ) cultured in contrasting aquaculture tanks in Uyo, Nigeria INSECTICIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY STATUS OF AEDES AEGYPTI IN UMUDIKE, IKWUANO LGA ABIA STATE, NIGERIA Preliminary study on the prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites of pigs managed and slaughtered in Umuahia north local government area of Abia State, Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1