The role of length of asylum procedure and legal status in the labour market integration of refugees in Germany

Yuliya Kosyakova, Hanna Brenzel
{"title":"The role of length of asylum procedure and legal status in the labour market integration of refugees in Germany","authors":"Yuliya Kosyakova, Hanna Brenzel","doi":"10.5771/0038-6073-2020-1-2-123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the role of the length of the asylum procedure and legal status in the integration process among recently arrived refugees in Germany. In particular, we focus on the transition to the first German language course and the transition to first employment. For our empirical investigation, we rely on the newest data from the IAB-BAMF-SOEP-Refugee Sample and apply survival analyses techniques. The results show that both procedure length and legal status shape integration processes. First, lengthy asylum procedures impede investments in acquisition of the language of the host society and delay labour market entry. Second, having a decision on the asylum application (irrespective of the outcome) increases the transition rate to the first job and promotes entry into the first language course. Presumably, legal certainty and a corresponding residence permit (even with a shorter-term perspective) are more decisive for the take-up of employment or investment in host country language acquisition. Beyond the outcome and the length of the asylum procedure, the origin country matters: refugees arriving from countries whose citizens have rather high prospects of remaining are quicker to take up a language course, whereas refugees with poor staying prospects manage to enter the labour market promptly to eventually improve their prospects of staying in Germany. We conclude that policymakers should prioritize efficient asylum procedures to create timely legal certainty and to encourage refugees’ integration process.","PeriodicalId":45144,"journal":{"name":"Soziale Welt-Zeitschrift Fur Sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung Und Praxis","volume":"35 1","pages":"123-159"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soziale Welt-Zeitschrift Fur Sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung Und Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/0038-6073-2020-1-2-123","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

This study examines the role of the length of the asylum procedure and legal status in the integration process among recently arrived refugees in Germany. In particular, we focus on the transition to the first German language course and the transition to first employment. For our empirical investigation, we rely on the newest data from the IAB-BAMF-SOEP-Refugee Sample and apply survival analyses techniques. The results show that both procedure length and legal status shape integration processes. First, lengthy asylum procedures impede investments in acquisition of the language of the host society and delay labour market entry. Second, having a decision on the asylum application (irrespective of the outcome) increases the transition rate to the first job and promotes entry into the first language course. Presumably, legal certainty and a corresponding residence permit (even with a shorter-term perspective) are more decisive for the take-up of employment or investment in host country language acquisition. Beyond the outcome and the length of the asylum procedure, the origin country matters: refugees arriving from countries whose citizens have rather high prospects of remaining are quicker to take up a language course, whereas refugees with poor staying prospects manage to enter the labour market promptly to eventually improve their prospects of staying in Germany. We conclude that policymakers should prioritize efficient asylum procedures to create timely legal certainty and to encourage refugees’ integration process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
庇护程序的长度和法律地位在德国难民融入劳动力市场中的作用
本研究考察了庇护程序的长度和法律地位在最近抵达德国的难民融入过程中的作用。我们特别关注的是向第一门德语课程的过渡以及向第一份工作的过渡。在我们的实证调查中,我们依靠来自IAB-BAMF-SOEP-Refugee样本的最新数据,并应用生存分析技术。结果表明,程序长度和法律地位共同决定了整合过程。首先,冗长的庇护程序阻碍了对获得东道国语言的投资,并推迟了进入劳动力市场的时间。其次,对庇护申请做出决定(无论结果如何)可以提高向第一份工作的过渡率,并促进进入第一门语言课程。据推测,法律确定性和相应的居留许可(即使是短期的)对于就业或投资东道国语言学习更具有决定性。除了结果和庇护程序的长度之外,原籍国也很重要:来自公民有很高希望留在德国的国家的难民会更快地学习语言课程,而那些居留前景不佳的难民则会设法迅速进入劳动力市场,最终改善他们留在德国的前景。我们的结论是,政策制定者应该优先考虑有效的庇护程序,以创造及时的法律确定性,并鼓励难民融入社会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Soziale Welt is one of the important journals within German sociology and is even read in foreign countries. It includes empirical and theoretical contributions from all areas of the subject and tries to portray the development of sociology and to give a new impetus. In addition to the quarterly published issues, there are special issues with a unified theme. The journal "Soziale Welt" is aimed at sociologists, social scientists, and at generally interested readers
期刊最新文献
Social Origin and Students’ Trajectory Patterns at German Universities. A Sequence-Analytical Approach (K)ein Platz für die Kunst und Kultur ethnischer Minderheiten? Zur Unterstützung der öffentlichen Förderung der Kunst und Kultur ethnischer Minderheiten in der deutschen Bevölkerung Zwischen Kontingenz und Curricula. Bewertungsprozesse in der universitären Lehre Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Homeoffice und suchthaftes Arbeiten in Deutschland. Sind Homeofficeintensität und betriebliche Regulierung von Bedeutung?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1