Cultural context and cross-country behavioral differences in group decision-making

S. Horak, Bindu Arya
{"title":"Cultural context and cross-country behavioral differences in group decision-making","authors":"S. Horak, Bindu Arya","doi":"10.1080/00208825.2020.1758423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study tests the influence of culture on group decision-making behavior among respondents in Korea and Germany. For our field experiment we are using an ultimatum game design, played among participants in Korea and in a benchmark experiment in Germany. We find evidence that taking the mosaic view of culture and making subjects aware of shared affective ties, based on age, educational-institution and regional origin, leads to differences in economic decisions, contrary to what neoclassical economic theory would suggest. Our results indicate that awareness of common group membership in some cultural contexts orients decision-makers toward upholding social norms that induces a greater preference for more selfless, in-group interested decisions, while anonymity makes personal identity salient and promotes more self-interested economic decisions. These effects are more pronounced in Korean participants compared with German participants.","PeriodicalId":55644,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL STUDIES OF MANAGEMENT & ORGANIZATION","volume":"1 1 1","pages":"153 - 173"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL STUDIES OF MANAGEMENT & ORGANIZATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.2020.1758423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract This study tests the influence of culture on group decision-making behavior among respondents in Korea and Germany. For our field experiment we are using an ultimatum game design, played among participants in Korea and in a benchmark experiment in Germany. We find evidence that taking the mosaic view of culture and making subjects aware of shared affective ties, based on age, educational-institution and regional origin, leads to differences in economic decisions, contrary to what neoclassical economic theory would suggest. Our results indicate that awareness of common group membership in some cultural contexts orients decision-makers toward upholding social norms that induces a greater preference for more selfless, in-group interested decisions, while anonymity makes personal identity salient and promotes more self-interested economic decisions. These effects are more pronounced in Korean participants compared with German participants.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
群体决策中的文化背景与跨国行为差异
摘要本研究考察了文化对韩国和德国受访者群体决策行为的影响。在我们的实地实验中,我们使用了最后通牒游戏设计,参与者来自韩国,基准实验来自德国。我们发现,有证据表明,采用文化的马赛克观点,让受试者意识到基于年龄、教育机构和地区出身的共同情感联系,会导致经济决策的差异,这与新古典经济理论所暗示的相反。我们的研究结果表明,在某些文化背景下,共同群体成员的意识使决策者倾向于维护社会规范,从而更倾向于无私的、群体内利益的决策,而匿名性使个人身份突出,并促进更多自利的经济决策。与德国参与者相比,这些影响在韩国参与者中更为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
“Homeward bound”: a systematic review of the repatriation literature Orientation and mental representations in the decision-making process: a comparison between junior and senior professional It’s the hierarchy, stupid: Varying perceptions of organizational culture between demographic groups The influence of synchronization of HR and PR practices in developing a strong CSR culture Bringing veganism to the wardrobe: examining consumers’ intention to buy vegan leather
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1