PRINCIPLES OF PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS OF MINOR PARTICIPANTS IN ADMINISTRATIVE-TORT RELATIONS

M. Veselov, O. Dubina
{"title":"PRINCIPLES OF PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS OF MINOR PARTICIPANTS IN ADMINISTRATIVE-TORT RELATIONS","authors":"M. Veselov, O. Dubina","doi":"10.17721/2227-796x.2021.2.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the article is to theoretically determine and clarify the state of legal support of the principles (principles) of protection of the rights of minors in administrative-tort relations. The research methodology was formed by a set of general scientific and special methods of cognition. In particular, the dialectical method of cognition was used by the authors in identifying the basic principles of legal protection of the rights of children (minors) in the implementation of administrative-tort relations in the context of continuous development and improvement of international and national law. Through a combination of methods of comparative analysis and synthesis, it was proved that the characteristics of juvenile participation in administrative tort proceedings together determine the principles of administrative proceedings and internationally established standards of child-friendly justice. The comparative law method was used in comparing the principles of protection of children’s rights of international and national (administrative) law. The results of the study are outlined in the list of basic principles of proceedings in cases of administrative offenses, as well as guidelines for the administration of child-friendly justice. The content of such international principles as: ensuring the best interests of the child; access of the juvenile to the court and obtaining the necessary information in a form and manner accessible to the child; participation of a minor in administrative-tort proceedings (principle of active participation, including the presumption of the child’s ability to be a full participant in these legal relations and mandatory participation of a minor in the administrative case against him); free expression of the child’s views and consideration of his opinion (the principle of being heard); the use of detention and forced detention of children only as an exceptional measure and for the shortest possible time. The expediency of introducing the principle of presumption of vulnerability of administrative and procedural rights of the child into administrative-tort relations is substantiated. The following conclusions are formulated in the article. It is established that the principles of protection of the rights of minors in administrative-tort relations are theoretically substantiated and enshrined in international and national administrative acts basic principles, guiding ideas that reflect the general nature and specifics of proceedings on administrative offenses involving minors. It was found that the basis for the protection of the rights of minors in administrative-tort relations is a set of interrelated principles of administrative-tort proceedings and international legal standards (rules) for the administration of child-friendly justice. It is emphasized that in both the first and the second case the list of these principles cannot be considered exhaustive, and the implementation of many of them has many common aspects and requires further improvement of Ukrainian legislation.","PeriodicalId":7222,"journal":{"name":"Administrative law and process","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administrative law and process","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2227-796x.2021.2.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to theoretically determine and clarify the state of legal support of the principles (principles) of protection of the rights of minors in administrative-tort relations. The research methodology was formed by a set of general scientific and special methods of cognition. In particular, the dialectical method of cognition was used by the authors in identifying the basic principles of legal protection of the rights of children (minors) in the implementation of administrative-tort relations in the context of continuous development and improvement of international and national law. Through a combination of methods of comparative analysis and synthesis, it was proved that the characteristics of juvenile participation in administrative tort proceedings together determine the principles of administrative proceedings and internationally established standards of child-friendly justice. The comparative law method was used in comparing the principles of protection of children’s rights of international and national (administrative) law. The results of the study are outlined in the list of basic principles of proceedings in cases of administrative offenses, as well as guidelines for the administration of child-friendly justice. The content of such international principles as: ensuring the best interests of the child; access of the juvenile to the court and obtaining the necessary information in a form and manner accessible to the child; participation of a minor in administrative-tort proceedings (principle of active participation, including the presumption of the child’s ability to be a full participant in these legal relations and mandatory participation of a minor in the administrative case against him); free expression of the child’s views and consideration of his opinion (the principle of being heard); the use of detention and forced detention of children only as an exceptional measure and for the shortest possible time. The expediency of introducing the principle of presumption of vulnerability of administrative and procedural rights of the child into administrative-tort relations is substantiated. The following conclusions are formulated in the article. It is established that the principles of protection of the rights of minors in administrative-tort relations are theoretically substantiated and enshrined in international and national administrative acts basic principles, guiding ideas that reflect the general nature and specifics of proceedings on administrative offenses involving minors. It was found that the basis for the protection of the rights of minors in administrative-tort relations is a set of interrelated principles of administrative-tort proceedings and international legal standards (rules) for the administration of child-friendly justice. It is emphasized that in both the first and the second case the list of these principles cannot be considered exhaustive, and the implementation of many of them has many common aspects and requires further improvement of Ukrainian legislation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
行政侵权关系中未成年参与人的权利保护原则
本文旨在从理论上确定和厘清行政侵权关系中未成年人权利保护原则(原则)的法律支撑状况。研究方法论是由一套一般科学的和特殊的认知方法构成的。特别是在国际法和国内法不断发展完善的背景下,运用辨证认识的方法,确定了行政侵权关系实施中儿童(未成年人)权利法律保护的基本原则。通过比较分析与综合相结合的方法,论证了未成年人参与行政侵权诉讼的特点共同决定了行政诉讼原则和国际公认的儿童友好司法标准。采用比较法的方法对国际法和国内法(行政法)的儿童权利保护原则进行了比较。这项研究的结果概述在行政犯罪案件诉讼程序的基本原则清单以及对儿童友好的司法行政准则中。以下国际原则的内容:确保儿童的最大利益;允许未成年人进入法庭,并以该未成年人易于接受的形式和方式取得必要的资料;未成年人参与行政侵权诉讼(积极参与原则,包括推定未成年人有能力完全参与这些法律关系和未成年人强制参与针对他的行政案件);儿童自由表达意见和考虑其意见(听取意见的原则);仅将拘留和强迫拘留儿童作为例外措施,并在尽可能短的时间内使用。论证了在行政侵权关系中引入儿童行政权利和程序权利易损性推定原则的权宜之计。本文得出以下结论。本文认为,在行政侵权关系中对未成年人权利的保护原则在理论上是有依据的,并体现在国际和国家行政行为基本原则、指导思想中,反映了未成年人行政违法诉讼的普遍性和特殊性。研究发现,在行政侵权关系中保护未成年人权利的基础是一套相互关联的行政侵权诉讼原则和有利于儿童的司法行政的国际法律标准(规则)。需要强调的是,在第一种和第二种情况下,这些原则的清单不能被认为是详尽无遗的,其中许多原则的执行有许多共同的方面,需要进一步改进乌克兰的立法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SOME ISSUES OF INSTANCE JURISDICTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR THE FUNCTIONING OF ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS UNDER MARITAL LAW THE LEGAL ESSENCE OF THE ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE: A BRIEF COMPARATIVE HISTORICAL AND LEGAL ANALYSIS PECULIARITIES OF DETERMINING THE LEGAL STATUS OF THE NATIONAL SECURITY AND DEFENSE COUNCIL OF UKRAINE AS A SUBJECT OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION THE LAW ON FOOD SECURITY OF UKRAINE AS A LEGAL BASIS OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION IN THE FIELD OF ENSURING FOOD SECURITY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1