Ethical Considerations for Parent-Adolescent Dyadic Research

Q2 Social Sciences Ethics & human research Pub Date : 2022-05-11 DOI:10.1002/eahr.500127
Kemesha Gabbidon, Tiffany Chenneville, Wendy Rote
{"title":"Ethical Considerations for Parent-Adolescent Dyadic Research","authors":"Kemesha Gabbidon,&nbsp;Tiffany Chenneville,&nbsp;Wendy Rote","doi":"10.1002/eahr.500127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Over the last few years, the use of dyadic research methods has expanded considerably. One area that has benefited from this type of research is the study of the family unit, particularly parent-adolescent dyads. Dyadic research allows investigators to assess relationship dynamics, processes, and congruences within a family unit, as well as the distinct experiences of each member of the dyad. However, like all emerging and expanding areas of human subjects research, parent-adolescent dyadic research faces several ethical challenges. Given the advantages of parent-adolescent dyadic research for examining family relational processes, this article addresses ethical challenges experienced by dyadic researchers that often temper interests in applying these approaches. Drawing on the scholarly literature and the authors’ experiences conducting parent-adolescent dyadic research, we discuss heightened and unique ethical challenges that arise in this area of inquiry and provide recommendations on how to best navigate those issues.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36829,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & human research","volume":"44 3","pages":"24-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics & human research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eahr.500127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Over the last few years, the use of dyadic research methods has expanded considerably. One area that has benefited from this type of research is the study of the family unit, particularly parent-adolescent dyads. Dyadic research allows investigators to assess relationship dynamics, processes, and congruences within a family unit, as well as the distinct experiences of each member of the dyad. However, like all emerging and expanding areas of human subjects research, parent-adolescent dyadic research faces several ethical challenges. Given the advantages of parent-adolescent dyadic research for examining family relational processes, this article addresses ethical challenges experienced by dyadic researchers that often temper interests in applying these approaches. Drawing on the scholarly literature and the authors’ experiences conducting parent-adolescent dyadic research, we discuss heightened and unique ethical challenges that arise in this area of inquiry and provide recommendations on how to best navigate those issues.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亲子二元研究的伦理考量
在过去几年中,二元研究方法的使用已大大扩大。从这种类型的研究中受益的一个领域是对家庭单位的研究,特别是对父母-青少年的研究。二元研究允许调查人员评估关系的动态,过程,以及家庭单位内的一致性,以及二元中每个成员的独特经历。然而,像所有新兴和扩大的人类受试者研究领域一样,父母-青少年二元研究面临着几个伦理挑战。鉴于父母-青少年二元研究在检查家庭关系过程中的优势,本文解决了二元研究人员在应用这些方法时经常缓和兴趣的伦理挑战。根据学术文献和作者进行父母-青少年二元研究的经验,我们讨论了在这一调查领域出现的高度和独特的伦理挑战,并就如何最好地处理这些问题提供了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ethics & human research
Ethics & human research Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Issue Information (Epistemic) Injustice and Resistance in Canadian Research Ethics Governance Ethical Considerations for Conducting Community-Engaged Research with Women Experiencing Homelessness and Incarcerated Women Investigating Moral Distress in Clinical Research Professionals—A Deep Dive into Troubled Waters Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1