Is There an Association between Paw Preference and Emotionality in Pet Dogs?

IF 0.7 4区 农林科学 Q4 ENTOMOLOGY Journal of Entomological Science Pub Date : 2022-04-29 DOI:10.3390/ani12091153
Tim Simon, Elisa Frasnelli, Kun Guo, Anjuli Barber, Anna Wilkinson, Daniel S Mills
{"title":"Is There an Association between Paw Preference and Emotionality in Pet Dogs?","authors":"Tim Simon, Elisa Frasnelli, Kun Guo, Anjuli Barber, Anna Wilkinson, Daniel S Mills","doi":"10.3390/ani12091153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research with humans and other animals has suggested that preferential limb use is linked to emotionality. A better understanding of this still under-explored area has the potential to establish limb preference as a marker of emotional vulnerability and risk for affective disorders. This study explored the potential relationship between paw preference and emotionality in pet dogs. We examined which paw the dogs preferentially used to hold a Kong™ and to perform two different locomotion tests. Dogs' emotionality was assessed using a validated psychometric test (the Positive and Negative Activation Scale-PANAS). Significant positive correlations were found for dogs' paw use between the different locomotion tasks, suggesting that dogs may show a more general paw preference that is stable across different types of locomotion. In comparison, the correlations between the Kong™ Test and locomotion tests were only partially significant, likely due to potential limitations of the Kong™ Test and/or test-specific biomechanical requirements. No significant correlations were identified between paw preference tests and PANAS scores. These results are in contrast to previous reports of an association between dog paw preference and emotionality; animal limb preference might be task-specific and have variable task-consistency, which raises methodological questions about the use of paw preference as a marker for emotional functioning.</p>","PeriodicalId":15765,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Entomological Science","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9103732/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Entomological Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12091153","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research with humans and other animals has suggested that preferential limb use is linked to emotionality. A better understanding of this still under-explored area has the potential to establish limb preference as a marker of emotional vulnerability and risk for affective disorders. This study explored the potential relationship between paw preference and emotionality in pet dogs. We examined which paw the dogs preferentially used to hold a Kong™ and to perform two different locomotion tests. Dogs' emotionality was assessed using a validated psychometric test (the Positive and Negative Activation Scale-PANAS). Significant positive correlations were found for dogs' paw use between the different locomotion tasks, suggesting that dogs may show a more general paw preference that is stable across different types of locomotion. In comparison, the correlations between the Kong™ Test and locomotion tests were only partially significant, likely due to potential limitations of the Kong™ Test and/or test-specific biomechanical requirements. No significant correlations were identified between paw preference tests and PANAS scores. These results are in contrast to previous reports of an association between dog paw preference and emotionality; animal limb preference might be task-specific and have variable task-consistency, which raises methodological questions about the use of paw preference as a marker for emotional functioning.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宠物狗的爪子偏好与情绪之间有关联吗?
对人类和其他动物的研究表明,肢体的优先使用与情绪化有关。如果能更好地了解这一尚未得到充分探索的领域,就有可能将肢体偏好确立为情绪脆弱性和情感障碍风险的标志。本研究探讨了宠物狗爪子偏好与情绪之间的潜在关系。我们研究了宠物狗更喜欢用哪只爪子握住金刚™和进行两种不同的运动测试。狗的情绪性是通过有效的心理测试(积极和消极激活量表-PANAS)来评估的。研究发现,在不同的运动任务中,狗对爪子的使用存在显著的正相关性,这表明狗在不同类型的运动中可能会表现出更普遍的爪子偏好,而且这种偏好是稳定的。相比之下,金刚™测试和运动测试之间的相关性只有部分显著,这可能是由于金刚™测试的潜在局限性和/或特定测试的生物力学要求造成的。爪子偏好测试与 PANAS 分数之间没有发现明显的相关性。这些结果与之前关于狗爪偏好与情绪之间的关联性的报道形成了鲜明对比;动物肢体偏好可能是任务特异性的,并且具有不同的任务一致性,这就对使用爪偏好作为情绪功能的标记提出了方法学问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Entomological Science (ISSN 0749-8004) is a peer-reviewed, scholarly journal that is published quarterly (January, April, July, and October) under the auspices of the Georgia Entomological Society in concert with Allen Press (Lawrence, Kansas). Manuscripts deemed acceptable for publication in the Journal report original research with insects and related arthropods or literature reviews offering foundations to innovative directions in entomological research
期刊最新文献
Impact of Pecan Leafroll Mite (Acari: Eriophyidae) on Pecan Foliage1 Susceptibility of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) Adult Populations to Imidacloprid in Georgia, USA1 Host Plant Feeding and Ovipositional Preferences of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) under Laboratory Conditions1 Field Evaluation of Biological and Conventional Insecticides for Managing Multiple Insect Pests in Cotton1 DNA Barcoding of Locusta migratoria manilensis (Orthoptera: Acrididae) Reveals Insights into the Species and Subspecies Differentiation1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1